Sexuality & Culture

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 217–239

“Let My Fingers Do the Talking”: Sexting and Infidelity in Cyberspace

Original Paper

Abstract

This exploratory project investigated the behaviors of sexting and infidelity on the internet. The researchers placed a survey on a web site designed for married people to find sexual partners outside their marriage. Using a sample of 5,187 respondents, the study explored how people use the internet to find partners. Using both descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analysis, the researchers found that the respondents use the internet to find real-life partners, both for dating and for sex hookups, but many are anxious about being caught. Females are more likely than males to engage in sexting behaviors, while females and males are equally as likely to cheat both online and in real life while in a serious real-life relationship. Older males, however, are more likely than younger males to cheat in real life. The results suggest that perhaps people who are using dating web sites do not conform to the “official” standards of dating culture, but that maybe the standards are changing.

Keywords

Sexting Infidelity Cybersex Internet Online dating Online Survey 

References

  1. Ackland, R. (2009). Social network services as data sources and platforms for e-researching social networks. Social Science Computer Review, 27, 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, P. B. (1996). Correlates of college women’s self-reports of heterosexual aggression. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 121–131.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous (2010). Ever sent a racy text to the wrong person?.Google Scholar
  4. Attwood, F. (2009). ‘Deepthroatfucker’ and ‘Discerning Adonis” men and cybersex. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagarozzi, D. A. (2008). Understanding and treating marital infidelity: A multidemensional model. The American Journal of Family Theory, 36, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barak, A., & King, S. A. (2000). The two faces of the internet: Introduction to the special issue on the internet and sexuality. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 517–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barraket, J., & Henry-Waring, M. S. (2008). Getting it on(line): Sociological perspectives on e-dating. Journal of Sociology, 44, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beasley, C. (2005). Gender and sexuality: Critical theories, critical thinkers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Berne, E. C. (2007). Online pornography. New York: Greenhaven Press.Google Scholar
  10. Blackstone, E. (1998). Virtual strangers: A woman’s guide to love and sex on the internet. Bellingham: Prospector Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2004). Using the online medium for discursive research about people with disabilities. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 228–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, J. E. (2004). Getting it on online: Cyberspace, gay male sexuality, and Embodied Identity. New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  13. Castaldo, J. (2009). Alone on the range. Canadian Business, 82, 32.Google Scholar
  14. Chapman, G. (2010). The 5 love languages: The secret to love that lasts. Chicago: Northfield Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Charness, N., & Boot, W. R. (2009). Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, A. (2008). Web site makes millions by connecting cheaters. NPR.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, A., Mansson, S. A., & Daneback, K. (2003). Predicting the future of internet sex: Online sexual activies in Sweden. Sexual and Relation Therapy, 18, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Couch, D., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Online dating and mating: The use of the internet to meet sexual partners. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Visser, R., & McDonald, Dee. (2007). Swings and roundabouts: Management of jealousy in heterosexual “swinging” couples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys—The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Epstein, R. (2009). The truth about online dating. Scientific American Mind, 20, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farrell, D., & Petersen, J. C. (2010). The growth of internet research methods and the reluctant sociologist. Sociological Inquiry, 80, 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frank, K. (2008). `Not gay, but not homophobic’: Male sexuality and homophobia in the ‘lifestyle’. Sexualities, 11, 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gagnon, J., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual deviance. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism modern societies. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  27. Glass, S. P., & Staeheli, J. C. (2004). Not “just friends”: Rebuilding trust and recovering your sanity after infidelity. La Jolla, CA: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Henline, B. H., Lamke, L. K., & Howard, M. D. (2007). Exploring perceptions of online infidelity. Personal Relationships, 14, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horvath, K. J., Simon Rosser, B. R., & Remafedi, G. (2008). Sexual risk taking among young internet-using men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1059–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughey, M. W. (2008). Virtual (Br)others and (Re)sisters. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37, 528–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. InterCommerce Corporation (2005). Survey net sex survey.Google Scholar
  32. Johnson, E. (2007). Dreaming of a mail: Order husband: Russian-American internet romance. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, R. H. (2005). ‘You show me yours, I’ll show you mine’: The negotiation of shifts from textual to visual modes in computer-mediated interaction among gay men. Visual Communications, 4, 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kammeyer, K. C. (2008). A hypersexual society: Sexual discourse, erotica, and pornography in America today. New York City: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  35. Laws, J., & Schwartz, P. (1977). Sexual scripts: The social construction of female sexuality. Washington, DC: United Press of America.Google Scholar
  36. Lewis, J., & West, A. (2009). ‘Friending’: London-based undergraduates’ experience of Facebook. New Media Society, 11, 1209–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Michael, R., Gagnon, J. H., Lauman, E., & Kolota, G. (1994). Sex in America: A definitive survey. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  38. Millner, V. (2008). Internet infidelity: A case of intimacy with detachment. The Family Journal, 16, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitra, Ananda. (1996). Nations and the internet. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 2, 44–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mitra, A., & Watts, E. (2002). Theorizing cyberspace: The idea of voice applied to the internet discourse. New Media & Society, 4, 479–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (2009). What is sexting? Why is it a problem? What parents and teens need to know. http://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/NewsEventServlet?LanguageCountry=en_US&PageId=4131.
  42. Neuman, M. G. (2009). The truth about cheating: Why men stray and what you can do to prevent it. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Nimrod, G. (2010). Seniors’ online communities: A quantitative content analysis. Gerontologist, 50, 382–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ono, H., & Tsai, H.-J. (2008). Race, parental socioeconomic status, and computer use time outside of school among young American children, 1997 to 2003. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 1650–1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pittman, Frank. (1990). Private lies: Infidelity and the betrayal of intimacy. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  46. Ross, M. W., Rosser, B. R. S., & Stanton, J. (2004). Beliefs about cybersex and internet-mediated sex of Latino men who have internet sex with men: relationships with sexual practices in cybersex and in real life. AIDS Care, 16, 1002–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ross, M. W., Simon Rosser, B. R., McCurdy, S., & Feldman, J. (2007). The advantages and limitations of seeking sex online: A comparison of reasons given for online and offline sexual liaisons by men who have sex with men. Journal of Sex Research, 44, 59–71.Google Scholar
  48. Sanders, T. (2008). Male sexual scripts. Sociology, 42, 400–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sarmiento, J. W., & Shumar, W. (2010). Boundaries and roles: Positioning and social location in the virtual math teams (VMT) online community. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 524–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scherrer, K. S. (2008). Coming to an asexual identity: Negotiating identity, negotiating desire. Sexualities, 11, 622–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schonfeld, E. (2008). Top social media sites of 2008 (Facebook Still Rising).Google Scholar
  52. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. (1984). Sexual scripts. Society, November/December, 53–60.Google Scholar
  53. Spring, J. A., & Spring, M. (1997). After the affair: Healing the pain and rebuilding trust when a partner has been unfaithful. New York: Harper Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  54. Stone, A. R. (1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  56. U.S. Census Bureau (2010). Statistical Abstract of the U.S. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  57. Wagner, B. (2009). Becoming a sexual being: Overcoming constraints on female sexuality. Sexualities, 12, 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using facebook. Communication Research, 36, 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Whitty, M. T. (2005). The realness of cybercheating: Men’s and women’s representations of unfaithful internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Whitty, M., & Carr, A. (2006). Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  61. Wood, E. A. (2008). Consciousness-raising 2.0: Sex blogging and the creation of a feminist sex commons. Feminism & Psychology, 18, 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wysocki, D. K. (1998). Let your fingers do the talking sex on an adult chat-line. Sexualities, 1, 425–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wysocki, D. K. (1999). Virtual sociology: Using computers in research. Iowa. Journal of Communication, 31, 59–67.Google Scholar
  64. Wysocki, D. K. (2001). Inherited bleeding disorders: Gynecologic and obsetric complications. The Female Patient, 26, 20–27.Google Scholar
  65. Wysocki, D. K., & Childers, C. (2009). Female sexuality in a survey of self magazine users. University of Nebraska at Kearney.Google Scholar
  66. Wysocki, D. K., & Thalken, J. (2007). Whips and chains? Fact or fiction? Content analysis of sadomasochism in internet personal advertisements. In M. T. Whitty, A. J. Baker, & J. A. Inman (Eds.), Online matchmaking (pp. 178–196). New York City: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology DepartmentUniversity of Nebraska at KearneyKearneyUSA
  2. 2.Sociology DepartmentWashburn UniversityTopekaUSA

Personalised recommendations