Skip to main content
Log in

Is it Really Just About Being More Like a Fag? Confronting the Gay Male Model Mantra

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the debate between feminism and queer is by now a fairly old and some might argue, trite and overwrought one, in this paper I direct my attention to a specific feminist assessment of queer that I find to be especially unhelpful and pernicious: the automatic linkage of queer with the exaltation of a gay male subjectivity. This article is informed by my own ethnographic research on lesbian/queer public sexual cultures; specifically, two Canadian lesbian/queer bathhouses, where public sex and sexual exploration are encouraged. I argue that this contention, that lesbians who espouse queer are aping (gay) male sexuality and subjectivity—due to the privileging of non-normative sexual practices found within the gay male community—does two things: (re)essentializes genders and sexualities, and, more importantly, robs non-gay male subjects (e.g., women, lesbians, butches, trans identified individuals) of their own agency. In sum, I believe that this linkage to a supposed gay male imitation, and concomitantly, viewing lesbian/queer sexual cultures, behaviors, configurations, and signifying sexual economies as mere derivatives of gay male culture, reinforces lesbian/queer invisibility and (re)centers the heterosexual matrix. For the sake of lesbian/queer subjects’ own viability, lesbian/queer sexualities must thus be pulled out of this discursive trap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, D., & Klein, R. (1996). Radically speaking: Feminism reclaimed. New York: Spinifex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, K. (2007). Embracing the catastrophe: Gay body seeks acceptance. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 259–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, A. (1996). The history of gay bathhouses. In B. Dangerous (Ed.), Policing public sex (pp. 187–220). Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1991). Imitation and gender subordination. In F. Diana (Ed.), Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories (pp. 13–31). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1994). Against proper objects. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 6(2–3), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1994). Public sex: The culture of radical sex. New York: Cleis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Califia, P. (1998). Sapphistry: The book of lesbian sexuality. New York: The Naiad Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, P., Claire, M., & Graham H. (2000). The bars, the bogs and the bushes’: The impact of locale on sexual cultures. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 2(1), 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frye, M. (1990). Lesbian ‘sex.’ In J. Allen (Ed.), Lesbian philosophies and cultures (pp. 305–316). New York: State University of New York Press.

  • Fuss, D. (1991). Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories. London: Routledge.

  • Gamson, J. (1995). Must identity movements self-destruct? A queer dilemma. Social Problems, 42(3), 390–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, E. (2000). Sex positive: Feminism, queer theory and the politics of transgression. Feminist Review, 64, 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, D. (1991). Love bites. London: Gay Men’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halley, J. (2006). Split decisions: How and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammers, C. (2008a). Bodies that speak and the promises of queer: Looking to two lesbian/queer bathhouses for a third way. The Journal of Gender Studies, 17(2).

  • Hammers, C. (2008b). The examination of bathhouse culture and the social organization of (Im)personal sex. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography; forthcoming.

  • Hill Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, C. (1994). The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. Sociological Theory, 12(2), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, S. (2003). Unpacking queer politics: A lesbian feminist perspective. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. (1991). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. (1996). Puberty, sexuality and the self: Girls and boys at adolescence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, M. (1968). The homosexual role. Social Problems, 16, 182–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J., Mark, C., & Diane, R. (2006). Intersections between feminist and queer theory. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. (2003). Feminism without borders. New York: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namaste, K. (1994). The politics of inside/out: queer theory, poststructuralism and a sociological approach to sexuality. Sociological Theory, 12, 220–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nestle, J. (1992). The persistent desire: A femme-butch reader. Boston: Alyson Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). The professor of parody. The New Republic, 22, 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (1981). The making of the modern homosexual. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

  • Reich, J. (1992). Genderfuck: The law of the Dildo. Discourse: Journal for Theoretical Studies in Media and Culture, 15(1), 112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5, 631-660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, D., Janice, M., & Mark, C. (2006). Intersections between feminism and queer theory. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.

  • Richters, J. (2007). Through a hole in the wall: Setting and intersection in sex-on-premises venues. Sexualities, 10(3), 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. S. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In S. K. Linda (Ed.), American feminist thought at century’s end: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, P. C. (2000). Bisexuality in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, C. (1992). Lesbians talk: Queer notions. London: Scarlet Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spade, D. (2005). Mutilating gender. www.makezine.org. Accessed on 9 October 2007.

  • Stein, A., & Ken P. (1994). I can’t even think straight: ‘Queer’ theory and the missing sexual revolution in sociology. Sociological Theory, 12, 178–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury, R. (2003). Bathhouse intercourse: Structural and behavorial aspects of an erotic oasis. In H. Christopher, & T. Richard (Eds.), Sexual deviance: A reader (pp. 167–191). New York: Lynn Rienner Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. (1996). Going public: A conversation with Lidell Jackson and Jocelyn Taylor. In B. Dangerous (Ed.), Policing public sex (pp. 53–72). Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, R. (1998). Feminist thought. Oxford: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, M. (1989). Beyond gender dangers and private pleasures: Theory and ethics in the sex debates. Feminist Studies, 15(2), 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. (1996). From here to queer: Radical feminism, postmodernism, and the lesbian menace (or, why can’t a woman be more like a fag?). Signs, 21(4), 830–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (1991). Fear of a queer planet. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M. S., & Williams, C. J. (1975). Gay baths and the social organization of impersonal sex. Social Problems, 23(2), 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (1996). The queer backlash. In B. Diane, & K. Renate (Eds.), Radically speaking: Feminism reclaimed (pp. 375–382). New York: Spinifex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, M. (1992). The straight mind and other essays. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corie J. Hammers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammers, C.J. Is it Really Just About Being More Like a Fag? Confronting the Gay Male Model Mantra. Sexuality & Culture 12, 151–168 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-008-9024-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-008-9024-z

Keywords

Navigation