Skip to main content

What do people do with porn? Qualitative research into the comsumption, use, and experience of pornography and other sexually explicit media

Abstract

This article reviews qualitative research into the consumption of pornography and other sexually explicit media emerging from a range of subject areas. Taking a critique of quantitative methods and a focus on measuring sexual effects and attitudes as a starting point, it considers the proposition that qualitative work is more suited to an examination of the complex social, cultural, and political constructions of sexuality. Examining studies into the way men, women, and young people see, experience, and use explicit media texts, the article identifies the key findings that have emerged. Qualitative work shows that sexually explicit media texts are experienced and understood in a variety of ways and evoke strong and often contradictory reactions, not all of which are represented in public debates about pornography. These texts function in a range of different ways, depending on context; as a source of knowledge, a resource for intimate practices, a site for identity construction, and an occasion for performing gender and sexuality. The article reviews these studies and their findings, identifying what they suggest about directions for future research, both in terms of developing methodology and refining approaches to sexuality and media consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Attwood, F. (2002) Reading porn: The paradigm shift in pornography research. Sexualities 5(1): 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, P. (1999). “Is that supposed to be sexy?” Women discuss women in “top shelf” magazines. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 9 449–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, S., & Buckingham, D. (2002). Young people and sexual content on television: A review of the research. London: Broadcasting Standards Commission, October 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, S. (2000). Full exposure: Opening up to sexual creativity and erotic expression. San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • BSC. (1999). Annual Monitoring Report No. 7 London: Broadcasting Standards Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D., & Bragg, S. (2003). Young people, media, and personal relationships: London: ASA/BBFC/BBC/BSC/ITC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. & Bragg, S. (2004). Young, people, sex, and the media: The facts of life? Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciclitira, K. (1998). What does pornography mean to women? Unpublished PhD thesis Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciclitira, K. (2002). Researching pornography and sexual bodies. The Psychologist 15(4): 191–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciclitira, K. (2004). Pornography, women, and feminism: Between pleasure and politics. Sexualities 7(3): 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, G., Chase, C.J., & Stahly, G.B. (1989). Feminist and fundamentalist attitudes toward pornography control. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13: 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durham, M.G. (1999). Girls, media, and the negotiation of sexuality: A study of race, class, and gender in adolescent peer groups. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 76(2): 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, B.A. (2003). Men are much harder: Gendered viewing of nude images. Gender & Society 17(5): 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everywoman. (1988). Pornography and sexual violence: Evidence of the links. London: Everywoman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, H. (2000). Focusing on sex: Using focus groups in sex research. Sexualities 3(3): 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, B. (2002). Media sex: What are the issues?, New Jersey & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. (1998). The reader, the author, his woman, and her lover. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. (2004). Reading pornography. Sex Education 4(1): 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A., & Thomson, K. (2000). Sex and the media: A shifting landscape. In R. Jowell et al. (Eds.), British social attitudes. The 17th report, Focusing on diversity. (pp. 71–99). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage/National Centre for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, S. (1976/2000). The Hite report on female sexuality. London: Hamlyn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, S. (1981). The Hite report on male sexuality. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. et al. (1998). The male in the head: Young people, heterosexuality, and power. London: The Tufnell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. (2004). Knowing pornography. In C. Carter, & L. Steiner (Eds.), Critical readings: media and gender. (pp. 246–264). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehily, M. (1999). More sugar? Teenage magazines, gender displays, and sexual learning. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2 (1): 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loach, L. (1992). Bad girls: Women who use pornography. In L. Segal & M. MacIntosh (Eds.), Sex exposed: Sexuality and the pornography debate. (pp. 266–274). London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, D. (2002). Watching sex: How men really respond to pornography. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, S. (1983/1985). Confessions of a feminist porn watcher. In G. Dines & J. Humez (Eds.), Gender, race and class in media. (pp. 307–313). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marriott, E. (2003, November 8). Men and porn. The Guardian Weekend, pp. 45–47, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, B. (2002). Striptease culture: Sex, media and the democratisation of desire. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millwood Hargrave, A. (Ed.). (1999). Sex and sensibility. London: John Libbey Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palac, L. (1998). On the edge of the bed: How dirty pictures changed my life. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, L. (1994). False Promises—Anti-Pornography Feminism. In M. Evans (Ed.), The Woman Question. (pp. 353–365). (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senn, C.Y. (1993). Women’s multiple perspectives and experiences with pornography. Psychology of Women Quarterly 17: 319–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S.M. (1999). Men’s leisure and women’s lives: the impact of pornography on women. Leisure Studies 18: 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, C. Tunks, K., & Hutchinson, D. (Eds.). (1991). Dear Clare ... this is what women feel about Page 3. London, Sydney, Auckland, Johannesburg: Hutchinson Radius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2002, February). They’re ordinary people, not aliens from the planet Sex!: The mundane excitements of pornography for women. Journal of Mundane Behaviour, 3.1. Retrieved September 3, 2002, from http:// www.mundanebehavior.org/issues/v3n1/csmith.html

  • Sprinkle, A. (1998). Post-porn modernist: My 25 years as a multimedia whore. Cleis Press.

  • Steele, J.R. (1999). Teenage sexuality and media practice: Factoring in the influences of family, friends, and school. Journal of Sex Research 36(4): 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdale, S. (1995). Talk dirty to me: An intimate philosophy of sex. London: Pan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson-Kovacs, D. (2004) “There is no Mrs. Ordinary doing the washing up”: Women’s consumption of erotica/pornography. Paper presented at the Pleasure & Danger Revisited: Sexualities in the 21st Century conference. Cardiff.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Attwood, F. What do people do with porn? Qualitative research into the comsumption, use, and experience of pornography and other sexually explicit media. Sex Cult 9, 65–86 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-005-1008-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-005-1008-7

Keywords

  • Qualitative Work
  • Heterosexual Relationship
  • Media Text
  • Sexually Explicit Medium
  • Explicit Material