Skip to main content
Log in

Sex symbols: The bachelorette party as a window to change in women’s sexual expression

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sexuality and Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bachelorette party, a women’s version of the traditional men’s bachelor party is rooted in the idea that marriage requires monogamy. This implies that women sacrifice sexual freedom when they get married in a way that was previously considered to be the case only for men. Furthermore, the bachelorette party is a means for expressing oneself sexually and acknowledging the sexual element of one’s identity. Until recently, this aspect of women’s identity was assumed to be either nonexistent or inapropriate in public. Sexual expression at the bachelorette party comes in many forms, such as the use of sexual props or objects and intimate interaction with men strangers or men exotic dancers. In this paper, I describe the changes in society that led to the development of the bachelorette party at this time in society. I then discuss the sexual element of this ritual by exploring the meaning of women’s behavior at this party, the structure of the ritual itself, and the objects used to create a hyperexualized atmosphere. I conclude that the bachelorette party symbolizes the ambivalence that is characteristic of modern women’s sexuality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahn, A., & Jaquez, A. (1997). One Style of Dominican Bridal Shower. Pp. 194–204 in The Family Experience. Hutter, M., ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, Z. (Director). (1989). Shag [Film]. Palace Pictures.

  • Berg, P. (Director). (1998). Very Bad Things [Film]. Ballpark Productions in association with Initial Entertainment Group and Interscope Communications.

  • Bizik, J. (2003, January/February). Girls Just Wanna Have Fun. Style Magazine, pp. 137–140.

  • Cheal, D. (1987). Relationships in Time: Ritual Social Structure and the Life Course. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 9: 83–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (2000). Bridal Showers. Carpinteria, CA: Wilshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S. (1994). Where the Girls Are: Growing Up Female with the Mass Media. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressel, P. L., & Petersen, D. (1982). Gender Roles, Sexuality, and the Male Strip Show: The Structuring of Sexual Opportunity. Sociological Focus. 15 (2): 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B. (1986). Re-making Love: The Feminization of Sex. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, G. (1998). Sex, Gender, and Social Change: The Great Revolution. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. (2002, February 21). Pre-Nup Party: Bachelor Party Traditions from around the Globe. Philadelphia City, Paper, p. 63.

  • Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, J. (2001). Here Comes the Bride: Women, Weddings, and the Marriage Mystique. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, C. (1999). White Weddings: Romancing Heterosexuality in Popular Culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, N. (Director). (1984). Bachelor Party [Film]. 20th Century Fox.

  • Jenkins, J. (2000). The Everything Wedding Shower Book. Holbrook, MA: Adams Media Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, K. & Laumann, E.O. (2001). Teenage Sex and the Sexual Revolution. Pp. 41–71 in Sex, Love, and Health in America: Private Choices and Public Policies. Laumann, E.O. and Michael, R.T., eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavet, H. I. (1999). The Bachelorette Party. Watertown, MA: Boston America Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, D. (1988). Ritual, Politics, and Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulish, N. (2002, September 3). Turning the Tables: Bachelorette Parties are Getting Risqué. Wall Street Journal, pp A1, A8.

  • LeMasters, E. E. (1957). Modern Courtship and Marriage. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, B. (2000). The Best Bachelorette Party Book: A Complete Guide for Party Planners. New York: Meadowbrook Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, D. (Director). (1957). The Bachelor Party [Film]. United Artists.

  • Marshall, G. (1996). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaughey, M. & French, C. (2001). Women’s Sex Toy Parties: Technology, Orgasm and Commodification. Sexuality & Culture. 5 (3): 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, A. (1999). Twentieth Century Sexuality: A History. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montemurro, B. (2001a). Something Old, Something New: The Bridal Shower and The Bachelorette Party as Rituals of Status Transformation. University of Georgia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

  • Montemurro, B. (2001b). Strippers and Screamers The Emergence of Social Control in a Non-Institutionalized Setting. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 30 (3).

  • Montemurro, B. (2002). You Go ‘Cause You Have To: The Bridal Shower as an Obligatory Ritual. Symbolic Interaction 25 (1).

  • Montemurro, B. (2003). Ladies Night Out: A Typology of Patrons of a Male Strip Club.” Deviant Behavior 24 (4).

  • Padavic, I. & Reskin, B. (2002). Women and Men at Work, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. (1997). Tried and Trousseau: The Bride Guide. New York: Fireside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. (1990). Erotic Wars: What Happened to the Sexual Revolution? New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J., Polonko, K., Teachman, J. & Thompson, L. (1989). The Sexual Bond: Rethinking Families and Close Relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J. (1995). Getting Off on Feminism. Pp. 107–126 in To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism, edited by R. Walker. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. & Rutter, V. (1998). The Gender of Sexuality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1967). Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1974). Dramas, Fields and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye, D. & Powers, A.M. (1998). Gender, Resistance and Play: Bachelorette Parties in Atlantic Canada. Women’s Studies International Forum 21 (5): 551–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montemurro, B. Sex symbols: The bachelorette party as a window to change in women’s sexual expression. Sex Cult 7, 3–29 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-003-1010-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-003-1010-x

Keywords

Navigation