Advertisement

Illegal fishing and fisheries crime as a transnational organized crime in Indonesia

  • Ioannis ChapsosEmail author
  • Steve Hamilton
Article

Abstract

Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing is increasingly drawing international attention and coastal states strengthen their efforts to address it as a matter of priority due to its severe implications for food, economic, environmental and social security. As the largest archipelagic country in the world, this is especially problematic for Indonesia. In this already complex geographical and security environment, the authors test the hypothesis that IUU fishing and fisheries crime(s) classify as transnational organized criminal activities. The article argues that IUU fishing is much more than simply a fisheries management issue, since it goes hand in hand with fisheries crime. As a result, although the two concepts are quite distinct, they are so closely interlinked and interrelated throughout the entire value chain of marine fisheries, that they can only be managed effectively collectively by understanding them both within the framework of transnational organized crime. To make this argument, the research utilizes qualitative and quantitative data collected from approximately two thousand trafficked fishers, rescued in 2015 from slavery conditions while stranded in two remote Indonesian locations: Benjina on Aru island and on Ambon island. The article’s findings also unveil new trends relating to the inner workings of the illegal fishing industry, in four different, yet interlinked categories: recruitment patterns and target groups; document forgery; forced labor and abuse; and fisheries violations. The paper concludes by confirming the hypothesis and highlights that IUU fishing provides the ideal (illegal) environment for fisheries crimes and other forms of transnational organized crimes to flourish.

Keywords

Maritime security Illegal fishing Fisheries crime Transnational organized crime Human trafficking Labor exploitation Indonesia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to put on record our thanks to the Editor of ‘Trends in Organized Crime’, the anonymous reviewers and our colleagues Dr Pete Munro, Dr James Malcolm and Ms Laura Payne for their input, feedback and comments on the article, as well as to Jessica Aitken for her professional proofreading services. Collectively they have helped to significantly improve its focus.

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclaimer

The opinions, comments and analyses expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarilyrepresent the views of any of the organizations with which the authors are affiliated.

References

  1. Albanese JS (2012) Deciphering the linkages between organized crime and transnational crime. J Int Aff 66(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antaranews (2016) Minister lauds success in fight against illegal fishing [online]. 22 November 2016 Available from http://wwwantaranewscom/en/news/107945/minister-lauds-success-in-fight-against-illegal-fishing Accessed 11 April 2017
  3. ARF [ASEAN Regional Forum] (2016). Co-chairs’ summary report. ARF Workshop on Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) Fishing, BaliGoogle Scholar
  4. ASEAN (2009) ASEAN political-security community blueprint. Jakarta, ASEAN SecretariatGoogle Scholar
  5. ASEAN news (2017) Illegal fishing costs Indonesia 3 billion dollars a year. Available from http://wwwaseannewsnet/illegal-fishing-costs-indonesia-3-billion-dollars-a-year/ Accessed 11 April 2017
  6. AU [African Union] (2014) 2050 Africa’s Integrated Maritime (AIM) strategy. Available from http://cggrps.org/wp-content/uploads/2050-AIM-Strategy_EN.pdf. Accessed Jan 2018
  7. Bondaroff, P., et al. (2015). The illegal fishing and organised crime nexus: illegal fishing as transnational organised crime. Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime and The Black FishGoogle Scholar
  8. Caballero-Anthony M, Hangzo PKK (2013) Transnational crime. In: Caballero-Anthony M, Cook A (eds) Non-traditional security in Asia: issues, challenges and framework for action. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapsos I (2016) Is maritime security a traditional security challenge? In: Masys AJ (ed) Exploring the security landscape: non-traditional security challenges. Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications. Springer, Cham, pp 59–78Google Scholar
  10. Chapsos I, Malcolm J (2017) Maritime security in Indonesia: towards a comprehensive agenda? Mar Policy 76(2017):178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Coning E (2016) Fisheries crime. In: Elliott, L. and Schaedla W., H. (eds.) Handbook of Transnational Environmental Crime. Edward Elgar publishing, Cheltenham, pp 146–167Google Scholar
  12. De Coning E, Witbooi E (2015) Towards a new ‘fisheries crime’ paradigm: challenges and opportunities with reference to South Africa as an illustrative example. Mar Policy 60:208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EU [European Union] (2014) European union maritime security strategy. Available from http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2011205%202014%20INIT. Accessed Jan 2018
  14. Finckenauer JO (2005) Problems of definition: what is organized crime? Trend Org Crime 8(3):63–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham, E. (2011) Transnational crime in the fishing industry: Asia’s problem? RSIS Commentaries. No. 62/2011. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies: SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  16. Haenlein, C. (2017) Below the surface: how illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing threatens our security. RUSI occasional paper, July 2017. Available from https://rusi.org/sites/default/files/201707_rusi_below_the_surface_haenlein.pdf. Accessed Jan 2018
  17. ILO (2014) Profits and poverty: the economics of forced labour. International Labour Office, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  18. Interpol (2017) Modern Slavery in the Fishing Industry: Interpol ‘project scale’. Interpol Environmental Security, 25 Jan. 2017 [online] available from http://www.seafish.org/media/1675866/seclg_jan2017_projectscale.pdf [accessed 6 Oct 2017]
  19. IOM (2015) ‘Human trafficking in the fishery sector: the Benjina case’, maritime security, June 2015, Issue 7Google Scholar
  20. IOM Indonesia (2015) Ambon’s trafficking-in-person case in relation to IUU fishing report - generated data report. Jakarta, IOM IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  21. IOM, KKP & Coventry University (2016) Report on human trafficking, forced labour and fisheries crime in the Indonesian fishing industry. Jakarta, IOM IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  22. IOM Thailand (2011) Trafficking of fishermen in Thailand. International Organization for Migration, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaiteh VF (2017) The end of shark finning? Impacts of declining catches and fin demand on coastal community livelihoods. Mar Policy 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.03.027
  24. Liddick D (2014) The dimensions of a transnational crime problem: the case of IUU fishing. Trend Org Crime 17(4):290–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malcolm JA (2017) Sustainability as maritime security: a Small Island developing state perspective? Global Policy 8(2):237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malcolm JA, Murday L (2017) Small islands' understanding of maritime security: the cases of Mauritius and Seychelles. J Indian Ocean Reg 13(2):234–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Osterblom H et al (2011) Illegal fishing and the organized crime analogy. Trend Ecol Evol 26(6):261–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parameswaran, P. (2016) ‘Indonesia could sink 57 more vessels in war on illegal fishing’. The Diplomat [online], available from https://thediplomat.com/2016/01/indonesia-could-sink-57-more-vessels-in-war-on-illegal-fishing/ [accessed 06 Oct 2017]
  29. Passas N (1999) Globalization, criminogenic asymmetries and economic crime. Eur J Law Ref 1(4):399–424Google Scholar
  30. Percy S (2016) Maritime crime and naval response. Survival 58(3):155–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pomeroy R et al (2016a) Drivers and impacts of fisheries scarcity, competition, and conflict on maritime security. Mar Policy 67(2016):94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pomeroy R et al (2016b) Improving marine fisheries management in Southeast Asia: results of a regional fisheries stakeholder analysis. Mar Policy 65:2016), 20–2016), 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salim, T. (2015) More trafficking cases uncovered, The Jakarta Post [online]. 15 May 2015. Available from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/05/15/more-trafficking-cases-uncovered.html [accessed 10 Apr. 2017]
  34. Santosa, M.A. (2016) The fight against fisheries and associated crimes in Indonesia: Indonesia’s multi-door approach in combating fisheries crime. Presidential task force to combat illegal fishing (TF115) [online], available from http://fishcrime.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Presentation_Mas-Achmad-Santosa.pdf [accessed 06 Oct 2017]
  35. Seafish (2017) Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing [online] available from http://www.seafish.org/responsible-sourcing/conserving-fish-stocks/illegal-unreported-and-unregulated-fishing [accessed 10 Apr. 2017]
  36. Shelley L (1995) Transnational organized crime: an imminent threat to the nation-state? J Int Aff 48(2):463–489Google Scholar
  37. Shelley L (2011) International trafficking: an important component of transnational crime. In: Okubo S, Shelley L (eds) Human security, transnational crime and human trafficking: Asian and western perspectives. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  38. Tempo (2016) Jokowi to Open International Fisheries Crime Symposium [online]. 10 October 2016. Available from https://en.tempo.co/read/news/2016/10/10/056810927/Jokowi-to-Open-International-Fisheries-Crime-Symposium [Accessed 11 Apr. 2017]
  39. Townsend, M. (2015). ‘Hunt on for slave-crewed Thai trawlers whose catch are UK-bound’, The Guardian [online]. 1 august 2015. Available from www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/01/slave-ships-papua-new-guinea-hunt-burmese-men-trawler [accessed 10 Apr. 2017]
  40. UK [United Kingdom] (2014) The UK National Strategy for Maritime Security, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. UN General Assembly (2008) Report of the Secretary General, Oceans and the law of the Seas. A/63/63Google Scholar
  42. United Nations Centre for International Crime Prevention (2000) Assessing transnational organized crime: results of a pilot survey of 40 selected organized criminal groups in 16 countries. Trend Org Crime 6(2):44–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. UNODC (2004) United Nations convention against transnational organized crime and the protocols thereto. United Nations Office on drugs and crime: Vienna, general assembly resolution 55/25 of 15 November 2000Google Scholar
  44. UNODC (2011) Transnational organized crime in the fishing industry. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  45. UNODC (2013a) Transnational organized crime in East Asia and the Pacific: a threat assessment. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  46. UNODC (2013b) Combatting transnational organized crime committed at sea: issue paper. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  47. UNODC (2016) Fisheries crime. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  48. US NIC [United States National Intelligence Council] (2016) Global Implications of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing. 2016. NIC WP 2016–02Google Scholar
  49. Williams P (1994) Transnational criminal organisations and international security. Survival 36(1):96–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williams P (1995) Transnational criminal organisations: strategic alliances. Wash Q 18(1):57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, P. (2012). How globalization affects transnational crime’ [online] council on foreign relations. Washington D.C., available from www.cfr.org/transnational-crime/globalization-affects-transnational-crime/p28403 [accessed 12 Feb 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Trust, Peace & Social RelationsCoventry UniversityCoventryUK
  2. 2.International Organization for Migration NorwayOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations