Assessing the developing knowledge-base of product counterfeiting: a content analysis of four decades of research

  • Brandon A. Sullivan
  • Fiona Chan
  • Roy Fenoff
  • Jeremy M. Wilson
Article

Abstract

Considering the steady and rapid growth of product counterfeiting and the damage it causes to society, it is important for criminology and criminal justice scholars to assist criminal justice officials, industry practitioners, and law makers in understanding the product counterfeiting problem and developing strategies to combat it. However, for researchers to be effective in their advisory role they must first establish what is known about product counterfeiting. As a first step in this process, we investigated relevant published research through a content analysis of 47 articles discussing product counterfeiting published in criminal justice and criminology journals through 2014. We analyzed various characteristics about the articles themselves, their authors, the journals they appeared in, and the nature and extent of their focus on product counterfeiting. We conclude this study with an evaluation of the state of product counterfeiting research and recommendations for future research.

Keywords

Product counterfeiting Content analysis Literature review Criminology Criminal justice Trademark infringement Intellectual property 

References

  1. Albanese JS (2011) Transnational crime and the twenty-first century: criminal enterprise, corruption and opportunity. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Attaran A, Bate R, Kendall M (2011) Why and how to make an International Crime of Medicine Counterfeiting. Journal of International Criminal Justice 9:325–354Google Scholar
  3. BASCAP (2011) Estimating the global economic and social impacts of counterfeiting and piracy. A report commissioned by business action to stop counterfeiting and piracy. Retrieved from: http://www.iccwbo.org/Advocacy-Codes-and-Rules/BASCAP/BASCAP-Research/Economic-impact/Global-Impacts-Study/
  4. Bate R (2008) Making a killing: the deadly implications of the counterfeit drug trade. AEI Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Bate R (2012) Phake: the deadly world of falsified and substandard medicines. AEI Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. Baudrillard J (1988) Consumer society. In: Baudrillard J (ed) Jean Baudrillard: selected writings. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 29–56Google Scholar
  7. Beresford AD, Desilets C, Haantz S, Kane J, Wall A (2005) Intellectual property and white-collar crime: report of issues, trends, and problems for future research. Trends in Organized Crime 8(4):62–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloch PH, Bush RF, Campbell L (1993) Consumer “accomplices” in product counterfeiting: a demand side investigation. J Consum Mark 10(4):27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calderoni F (2014) Mythical numbers and the proceeds of organized crime: estimating mafia proceeds in Italy. Global Crime 15(1–2):138–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaudry P, Zimmerman A (2009) The economics of counterfeit trade: governments, pirates and intellectual property rights. Springer-Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  11. Chow DC (2003) Organized crime, local protectionism, and the trade in counterfeit goods in China. China Econ Rev 14:473–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CIB (1997) Countering counterfeiting: a guide to protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights. Counterfeiting Intelligence Bureau, International Chamber of Commerce, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Copes H, Brown A, Tewksbury R (2011) A content analysis of ethnographic research published in top criminology and criminal justice journals from 2000 to 2009. J Crim Justice Educ 22(3):341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EUROPOL (2013) Serious and organized crime threat assessment (SOCTA). Report prepared by European Police Office (EUROPOL). Retrieved from: https://www.europol.europa.eu/content/eu-serious-and-organised-crime-threat-assessment-socta
  15. Farrell G, Roman J (2006) Crime as pollution: proposal for market-based incentives to reduce crime externalities. In: Moss K, Stephens M (eds) Crime reduction and law. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  16. Fejes ZL, Wilson JM (2013) Cue utilization in the product authentication process: a framework and research agenda for product counterfeit prevention. Int J Comp Appl Crim Justice 37(4):317–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fenoff R, Spink J (2013) Counterfeiting. In: Albanese JS, Schneider JL (eds) Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Wiley-Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  18. Fenoff R, Wilson J (2009) Africa’s counterfeit pharmaceutical epidemic: The road ahead. Center for Anti-Counterfeiting and Product Protection (A-CAPP) Paper Series, Michigan State University. Retrieved from: http://a-capp.msu.edu/sites/default/files/files/AfricaPharmaPaperFINAL.pdf
  19. Fernandez FM, Green MD, Newton PN (2008) Prevalence and detection of counterfeit pharmaceuticals: a mini review. Ind Eng Chem Res 47(3):585–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ganor B, Wernli MH (2013) The infiltration of terrorist organizations into the pharmaceutical industry: Hezbollah as a case study. Stud Conflict & Terrorism 36(9):699–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garfield E (1972) Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178(4060):471–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grossman GM, Shapiro C (1988) Counterfeit-product trade. Am Econ Rev 78(1):59–75Google Scholar
  23. Heinonen JA, Wilson JM (2012) Product counterfeiting at the state level: an empirical examination of Michigan-related incidents. Int J Comp Appl Crim Justice 36(4):273–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heinonen JA, Holt TJ, Wilson JM (2012) Product counterfeits in the online environment: an empirical assessment of victimization and reporting characteristics. Int Crim Justice Rev 22(4):353–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heinonen JA, Spink J, Wilson JM (2014) When crime events defy classification: The case of product counterfeiting. Security Journal. (advance online publication)Google Scholar
  26. Hetzer W (2002) Godfathers and pirates: counterfeiting and organized crime. Eur J Crime, Crim Law Crim Justice 10(4):303–320Google Scholar
  27. Hilton B, Choi CJ, Millar C (2000) Quality, counterfeits, and strategy in the fashion industry. Secur J 13(4):53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hollis ME, Wilson JM (2014) Who are the guardians in product counterfeiting? A theoretical application of routine activities theory. Crime Prevention and Community Saf 16(3):169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hopkins DM, Kontnik LT, Turnage MT (2003) Counterfeiting exposed: protecting your brand and customers. John Wiley & Sons, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  30. Jayasuriya DC (1997) Counterfeit medicines: strategies to deal with a commercial crime. J Financ Crime 5(1):7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jennings JS (1989) Trademark counterfeiting: an unpunished crime. J Crim Law Criminol 80(3):805–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liang BA (2006) Fade to black: importation and counterfeit drugs. Am J Law Med 32:279–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lin JY (2011) Fake stuff: China and the rise of counterfeit goods. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Lowe P (2006) Counterfeiting: links to organised crime and terrorist funding. J Financ Crime 13(2):255–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mace RR (2007) Supply chains, illicit markets, and terrorism: understanding organizations and strategies. In: Durmaz H, Sevinc B, Yayla AS, Ekici S (eds) Understanding and responding to terrorism. IOS Press, Fairfax, pp 236–241Google Scholar
  36. Mackenzie S (2010) Counterfeiting as corporate externality: intellectual property crime and global insecurity. Crime Law Soc Chang 54(1):21–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Magazzino C, Mantovani M (2014) Counterfeiting in Italian regions: an empirical analysis based on new data. J Financ Crime 21(4):400–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCartney S (2005) The fake factor: why we love brands but buy fakes. Cyan Communications Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. McEwan A, Straus L (2009) Counterfeit tobacco in London: local crime requires an international solution. Trends in Organized Crime 12(3):251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murray B (2004) Defending the brand: aggressive strategies for protecting your brand in the online arena. American Management Association, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Naim M (2005) Illicit. First Anchor Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Nasheri H (2005) Addressing the global scope of intellectual property crimes and policy initiatives. Trends in Organized Crime 8(4):79–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nee J (1985) Commercial counterfeiting: an emerging entrepreneurship for international local, and organized crime. J Secur Adm 8(2):31–38Google Scholar
  44. OECD. (2008) The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy. Report, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/sti/38707619.pdf
  45. Phillips T (2005) Knockoff: the deadly trade in counterfeit goods. Kogan Page, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  46. Post RS, Post PN (2007) Global brand integrity management. McGraw Hill Professional, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Reynolds D (2011) Manipulating perceived risk to deter and disrupt counterfeiters. J Financ Crime 18(1):105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Satchwell G (2004) A sick business: counterfeit medicines and organised crime. The Stockholm Network, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Savelsberg JJ, Flood SM (2004) Criminological knowledge: period and cohort effects in scholarship. Criminology 42(4):1009–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shen A, Antonopoulos GA, von Lampe K (2010) “The dragon breathes smoke”: cigarette counterfeiting in the People’s Republic of China. Br J Criminol 50(2):239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spink J, Fejes ZL (2012) A review of the economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy methodologies and assessment of currently utilized estimates. Int J Comp Appl Crim Justice 36(4):249–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spink J, Moyer DC, Park H, Heinonen JA (2013) Defining the types of counterfeiters, counterfeiting, and offender organizations. Crime Science 2(8):1–10Google Scholar
  53. Staake T, Fleisch E (2008) Countering counterfeit trade: illicit market insights, best-practice strategies, and management toolbox. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stinson PM, Huck JL, Spraitz JD (2010) A content analysis of criminal justice policy review, 1986-2008. Crim Justice Policy Rev 21(2):239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sullivan BA, Chermak SM (2012) The media’s portrayal of product counterfeiting and financial crimes. Int J Comp Appl Crim Justice 36(4):305–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sullivan BA, Chermak SM (2013) Product counterfeiting and the media: examining news sources used in the construction of product counterfeiting as a social problem. Int J Comp Appl Crim Justice 37(4):295–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sullivan BA, Chermak SM, Wilson JM, Freilich JD (2014) The nexus between terrorism and product counterfeiting in the United States. Global Crime 15(3–4):357–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tewksbury R, DeMichele MT, Miller JM (2005) Methodological orientations of articles appearing in criminal justice’s top journals: who publishes what and where. J Crim Justice Educ 16(2):265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thomas D (2008) Delux: how luxury lost its lustre. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Thompson Reuters (2015) InCites Journal Citation Reports. Retrieved from: https://jcr.incites.thomsonreuters.com/JCRJournalHomeAction.action
  61. Thomson Reuters (2014) The Thomson Reuters impact factor. Retrieved from: http://wokinfo.com/essays/impact-factor/
  62. Treadwell J (2012) From the car boot to booting it up? eBay, online counterfeit crime and the transformation of the criminal marketplace. Criminol Crim Justice 12(2):175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. U.S. GAO (2010) Intellectual property: observations on efforts to quantify the economic effects of counterfeit and pirated goods, Report to Congressional Requesters. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), Washington D.C. Retrieved from: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10423.pdf
  64. U.S. CBP (2012) Intellectual property rights: fiscal year 2011 seizure statistics. Report prepared by United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Office of International Trade. Retrieved from: http://www.ice.gov/doclib/iprcenter/pdf/ipr-fy-2011-seizure-report.pdf
  65. U.S. DOJ (2008) Overview of the Law Enforcement Strategy to Combat International Organized Crime. Report prepared by U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Washington D.C. Retrieved from: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ag/legacy/2008/04/23/ioc-strategy-public-overview.pdf
  66. U.S. FDA (2009) FDA initiative to combat counterfeit drugs. Report prepared by U.S. Department of Health and Services, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm180899.htm
  67. UNICRI (2007) Counterfeiting: a global spread, a global threat. Report prepared by the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.unicri.it/news/article/0712-3_counterfeiting_crt_foundation
  68. UNODC (2014) The illicit trafficking of counterfeit goods and transnational organized crime. Report prepared by United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Retrieved from: https://www.unodc.org/documents/counterfeit/FocusSheet/Counterfeit_focussheet_EN_HIRES.pdf
  69. Vagg J (1995) The policing of signs: trademark infringement and law enforcement. Eur J Crim Policy Res 3(2):75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vagg J, Harris J (2000) False profits: why product counterfeiting is increasing. Eur J Crim Policy Res 8(1):107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wald J, Holleran J (2007) Counterfeit products and faulty supply chain. Risk Manage 54(4):58–62Google Scholar
  72. Wall DS, Large J (2010) Jailhouse frocks: locating the public interest in policing counterfeit luxury fashion goods. Br J Criminol 50(6):1094–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wang Y, Alocilja EC (2012) Sensor technologies for anti-counterfeiting. Int J Comp Appl Crim Justice 36(4):291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. WCO (2012) Customs and IPR report 2011. Report prepared by the World Customs Organization (WCO). Retrieved from: http://www.wcoomd.org/en/media/newsroom/2012/july/~/media/B5259E0497CA4FDF8CD64EB88F5D6CE7.ashx
  75. Weber S, Barma N, Kroenig M, Ratner E (2007) How globalization went bad. Foreign policy 158:48–54Google Scholar
  76. Wilson JM, Fenoff R (2014) Distinguishing counterfeit from authentic product retailers in the virtual marketplace. Int Crim Justice Rev 24(1):39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wilson JM, Sullivan BA, Hollis ME (2016) Measuring the “unmeasurable”: approaches to assessing the nature and extent of product counterfeiting. Int Crim Justice Rev 26(3):259–276Google Scholar
  78. Yar M (2005) A deadly faith in fakes: trademark theft and the global trade in counterfeit automotive components. Internet J Criminol:1–33Google Scholar
  79. Zhang SX, Pacheco-McEvoy R, Campos R (2012) Sex trafficking in Latin America: dominate discourse, empirical paucity, and promising research. Global Crime 13(1):22–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brandon A. Sullivan
    • 1
  • Fiona Chan
    • 2
  • Roy Fenoff
    • 3
  • Jeremy M. Wilson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Anti-Counterfeiting and Product Protection (A-CAPP)Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.School of Criminal JusticeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Department of Criminal JusticeThe CitadelCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations