Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Narcophobia: drugs prohibition and the generation of human rights abuses

  • Published:
Trends in Organized Crime Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the negative aspects of global drugs prohibition. The paper argues that prohibition, which is driven by moralism rather than empirical research, creates a black market that is regulated by violent entrepreneurs, and particular in developing countries where there is a lack of economic opportunities for the poor, offers the only feasible employment options. The paper suggests that the results of experimental legislation should be taken seriously. The militarisation of prohibition enforcement has hindered the advancement of democracy and led to violence and increases in human rights abuses. In conclusion it is argued that the current system of global prohibition creates more problems than it solves, and that issues of drug production and trade need to be dealt with by regulation from within a development perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Coincidence or not, it is interesting to note that in China, according to Dikotter (2003), “the commodity that most benefited from prohibition was the ready-made cigarette”, a market dominated by the US and the UK.

  2. A/RES/S-20/2, "Political Declaration", General Assembly 20th Special Session, 9th Plenary Meeting. June 10 1998.

  3. Brazil has the larger population of opioid (635,000) and cocaine users (890,000) in South America as well as the third highest rate of amphetamines’ consumption in the world, according to the 2009 World Drug Report (UNODC 2009).

  4. Analysis of data from National Household Survey (PNAD, 1999 cited by Paes de Barros et al. 2001).

  5. Reports from Human Rights Watch (1996) and Amnesty International (2005) have well documented evidence of police practices such as torture and extrajudicial executions in areas of social exclusion.

  6. Official data from the National System of Toxic Pharmacology Information (Ministry of Health)

References

  • Adorno S (1990) Violencia urbana, justica criminal e organização social do crime, (urban violence, criminal justice and crime social organization). Núcleo de Estudos da Violência (USP), São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno S, Pazinato W (2009) Estudo da impunidade penal no município de São Paulo, 1991–1997 (Study on legal impunity in São Paulo 1991–1997). São Paulo University (USP), São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft A (2009) Drugs, intoxication and society. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett D, Nowak M (2009) The United Nations and drug policy: towards a human rights-based approach. In: Constantinides A, Zaikos N (eds) The diversity of international law: essay in honour of professor Kalliopi Koufa, Martinus Nijhoff, pp 449–477

  • Beato C, Assuncao R (2000) Homicide clusters and drug traffic in Belo Horizonte from 1995 to 1999. Anais da 24 Reuniao da ANPOCS, Sao Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett W (1991) The plea to legalize drugs is a siren call to surrender. In: Lyman M, Potter G (eds) Drugs in society. Anderson, Cincinatti

    Google Scholar 

  • Best J (1989) Images of issues: typifying contemporary social issues. De Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley-Taylor D (1999) The United States and International Drug Control, 1909–1997, London

  • Bewley-Taylor D (2003) Challenging the UN drug control concentions: Problems and possibilities. Int J Drug Pol 14:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewley-Taylor D (2005) Emerging policy contradictions between the United Nations drug control system and the core values of the United Nations. Int J Drug Pol 16:423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullington B (1993) All about eve: the many faces of United States drug policy. In: Pearce F, Woodiwiss M (eds) Global crime connections. University of Toronto, Toronto, pp 32–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee SK (1981) Legal aspects of international drug control. Nijhoff, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinkin C (1998) International law and human rights. In: Evans T (ed) Human rights 50 years on: a reppraisal. Manchester University, Manchester, pp 105–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S (2001) States of denial: knowing about atrocities and suffering. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen P, Reinarman C, Kaal H (2004) The limited relevance of drug policy: cannabis in Amsterdam and in San Francisco. Am J Public Health 94(5):836–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikotter F (2003) Patient zero’: China and the myth of the opium plague. School of oriental and African studies (SOAS), http://web.mac.com/dikotter

  • Dowdney L (2003) Children of the drug trade: a case study of children in organised armed violence in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: 7 Letras

  • Elwood W (1994) Rhetoric in the war on drugs: the triumphs and tragedies of public relations. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1989) An open letter to Bill Bennett. Wall Street Journal, September 7

  • Friman H (1991) The United States, Japan, and the international drug trade: troubled partnership. Asian Surv 31(9):875–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald G (2009) Drug decriminalization in Portugal: lessons for creating fair and successful drug policies. Cato, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanes WF, Sanello F (2002) Opium wars: the addiction of one empire and the corruption of another. Sourcebooks, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawdon J (2001) The role of presidential rhetoric in the creation of a moral panic: Reagan, Bush and the war on drugs. Deviant Behav 22:419–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs D (forthcoming) Populating the underworld. Polity, Cambridge

  • Huntington S (1991) The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma, Norman

    Google Scholar 

  • Iulianelli JAS (2004) Rural Brazil: cannabis and violence. Drugs and Conflict No. 11

  • Johns CJ (1992) Power, ideology and the war on drugs: nothing succeeds like failure. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledebur K (2005) Bolivia: clear consequences. In: Youngers CA, Rosin E (eds) Drugs and democracy in Latin America: the impact of US policy. Rienner, Boulder, pp 143–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine HG (2003) Global drug prohibition: its uses and crises. Int J Drug Pol 14:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcallister W (2000) Drug diplomacy in the twentieth century: an international history. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mena F (2009) From commodities to evildoers: moral discourses towards drugs trade, prohibition and war. LSE. Department of Sociology, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron JA (2004) Drug war crime. Independent, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Musto DF (1987) The American disease: origins of narcotic control. Oxford University, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelmann E (1990) Global prohibition regimes: the evolution of norms in international society. Int Organ 44(4):479–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paes de Barros R, Henrique R, Mendonça R (2001) A estabilidade inaceitável: desigualdade e pobreza no Brasil. Texto para Discussão, n. 800. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA

  • Picketing M (2001) Stereotyping and politics of representation. Macmillan, Houndmills

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos S (2009) Meninos do Rio: Jovens, violência armada e polícia nas favelas cariocas. UNICEF

  • Reinarman C (1979) Moral entrepreneurs and political economy: historical and ethnographic notes on the construction of the cocaine menace. Contemp Crises 3:225–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said E (1978) Orientalism. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone R (2006) Media and morality: on the rise of the Mediapolis. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares LE, Se JTS, Rodrigues JAS, Piquet Carneiro L (1996) Violência e política no Rio de Janeiro (violence and politics in Rio de Janeiro). Relume Dumara, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweig J (2002) What kind of war for Colombia? Foreign Aff 81:122–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AH (1969) American diplomacy and the narcotics traffic, 1900–1939: a study in international humanitarian reform. Duke University, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby W (1976) Opium as an international problem. John Hopkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JQ (1990) Against the legalization of drugs. Commentary 89(2):21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodiwiss M (1988) Crime, crusades and corruption: prohibitions in the United States, 1900–1987. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodiwiss M (1993) Crime’s global reach. In: Pearce F, Woodiwiss M (eds) Global crime connections. University of Toronto, Toronto, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodiwiss M, Bewley-Taylor D (2005) The global fix: the construction of a global enforcement regime. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute, available at http://www.tni.org/detail_pub.phtml?&know_id=68.

  • Woodiwiss M, Hobbs D (2009) Organized evil and the atlantic alliance. Br J Criminol 49(1):106–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngers CA, Rosin E (2005) Drugs and democracy in Latin America: the impact of US policy. Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaluar A (2001) Violence in Rio de Janeiro: styles of leisure, drug use and trafficking. Int Soc Sci J 63(169):369–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

UN documents, NGO/civil society organization’s reports and newspaper articles

  • AI (Amnesty International) (2005) They come in shooting: policing socially excluded communities’, available online at: http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/AMR19/025/2005

  • AI (Amnesty International) (2008) Amnesty international report 2008, available at: http://archive.amnesty.org/air2008/eng/Homepage.html

  • Annan K (2005) In larger freedom: toward development, security and human rights for all. United Nations, New York Report of the Secretary-General, document A/59/2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme (2008) Recalibrating the regime: the need for a human rights based approach to international drug policy. Report No. 13, available online at: http://www.beckleyfoundation.org/pdf/report_13.pdf

  • Brazilian Information Centre for Psychotropic Use (2005) II home survey on the use of psychotropic use in Brazil 2005. Federal University of Sao Paolo, Sao Paolo

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971) 32 U.S.T. 543, T.I.A.S. 9725, 1019 U.N.T.S. 17

  • Convention Against the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (1988) U.N. Doc. E/CONF.82/15

  • Favela Watch (Observatorio de Favelas) (2006) The journey of children, teenagers and young adults in retail drug trafficking in Rio de Janeiro: 2004–2006. Available online at: http://www.observatoriodefavelas.org.br

  • Human Rights Watch (1996) Fighting violence with violence: human rights abuses and criminality in Rio de Janeiro. Hum Rights Watch/Am 8(2):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch (2009) World report 2009. Human Rights Watch, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • ICESC (International Covenant for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) (1966) General assembly resolution A/RES/21/2200 A

  • Latin American Commission on Drugs and Democracy (2009) Towards a paradigm shift, available online at: http://www.drogasedemocracia.org/Arquivos/declaracao_ingles_site.pdf

  • Nowak M (2008) Report of the special rapporteur on torture and other cruel. Inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’, UN Doc. No. A/HRC/7/3/Add.7, 10 March 2008

  • OHCHR (2004) The global compact and human rights: understanding the sphere of influence and complicity. OHCHR briefing paper. December 2004, available online at: http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/human_rights/Resources/OHCHR_briefing_paper_Dec_04.pdf

  • Phillips T (2007) Blood on the streets as drug gang and police fight for control of Rio favelas. The Guardian, June 27

  • Phillips T (2009) Twelve dead and helicopter downed as Rio de Janeiro drug gangs go to war. The Guardian, October 17

  • Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (1961) March 30, 1961, 520 U.N.T.S. 204

  • The Times (1902) The primate on the opium traffic. October 9th, p. 5

  • The Times (1922) Cocaine. April 25th, p. 13

  • The Times (1922) Cocaine debauchery. May 1st, p. 19

  • Transnational Institute (2008) Rewriting history: a response to the 2008 world drug report. Drug policy briefing No 26, available online at: http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?act_id=18438

  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2008) Global trends 2008. Available online at: http://www.unhcr.org

  • UNODC (2008) Making drug control fit for purpose: building on the UNGASS decade. UN Doc. No. E/CN.7/2008/CRP.17

  • UNODC (2009) World drug report 2009. UNODC, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Waisenlfisz JJ (2008) Mapa da Violência: os Jovens da América Latina 2008. Unesco Brasil

  • Williams EH (1914) Negro cocaine ‘fiends’ are a new southern menace. The New York Times. February 8th

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dick Hobbs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mena, F., Hobbs, D. Narcophobia: drugs prohibition and the generation of human rights abuses. Trends Organ Crim 13, 60–74 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-009-9087-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-009-9087-8

Keywords

Navigation