Skip to main content

Populism and the Past: Restoring, Retaining, and Redeeming the Nation

Abstract

Populism and nationalism have been described as major threats to democracy. But ambiguities linger over their conceptual boundaries and overlaps. This article develops a typology of nationalist narratives to historically situate the recent global rise of populist nationalism. Specifically, we identify three common types of historical experience with empire that have shaped contemporary expressions of nationalism by populist leaders: imperial power, where a nation’s forerunner was the leading polity in a regional or global empire; imperial subject, where a nation was ruled and dominated by an imperial power, and imperial holdout, where a nation battled off imperial encroachments with relative success. Collective memories of these divergent imperial experiences are associated with three distinct types of nationalist narratives today: restorative nationalism in former imperial powers, redemptive nationalism in former imperial subjects, and retentive nationalism in former imperial holdouts. We illustrate this typology in three major cases of twenty-first-century populism: Turkey under Erdogan, the Philippines under Duterte, and Thailand under Thaksin. We tentatively contend that restorative nationalism is an especially likely conduit for greater political disruptions at home and abroad.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. Obama’s speech is available at https://tinyurl.com/uwt5hbud.

  2. Populism is not unique to democratic politics. China’s anti-corruption campaign is an example of populist politics that punishes the corrupt elites on behalf of the people. Some call contemporary China a “populist authoritarian” regime (Tang 2016).

References

  • Anderson B. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso books; 1983.

  • Applebaum A. Twilight of democracy: the seductive lure of authoritarianism. Signal; 2020.

  • Baker C. Pluto-populism: Thaksin, business, and popular politics in post-crisis Thailand. In: Warr P, editor. Thailand beyond the crisis. New York: Routledge; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger M. Nationalist mobilization and the collapse of the Soviet Union. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bello W. Rodrigo Duterte: A fascist original. TNI; 2017, Jan 19. https://tinyurl.com/3n38a3k5. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • BloombergHT. Erdogan: Turk milleti her zaman oldugu gibi Azerbaycanli kardeslerinin yanindadir. 2020, Sept 22. https://tinyurl.com/f7hmhptx. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Bonikowski B. Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. Br J Sociol 2017;68(1):181–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonikowski B, Halikiopoulou D, Kaufmann E, Rooduijn M. Populism and nationalism in a comparative perspective: a scholarly exchange. Nations Nationalism 2019;25(1):58–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boym S. The future of nostalgia. Basic books; 2008.

  • Brubaker R. Myths and misconceptions in the study of nationalism. In: Hall J, editor. The state of the nation: Ernest Gellner and the theory of nationalism. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 272–306.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker R. The Manichean myth: rethinking the distinction between ‘civic’ and ‘ethnic’ nationalism. In: Kriesi H, Armington K, Siegrist H, Wimmer A, editors. Nation and national identity: The European experience in perspective. Rüegger; 1999. p. 55–71.

  • Brubaker R, Loveman M, Stamatov P. Ethnicity as cognition. Theory Soc 2004;33(1):31–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker R. Why populism? Theory Soc 2017;46(5):357–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker R. Populism and nationalism. Nations Nationalism 2020;26(1):44–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanella E. A diminished nation in search of an empire. Foreign Policy; 2019, Oct 24. https://tinyurl.com/74664sn8. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Çevik SB. Turkish historical television series: public broadcasting of neo-Ottoman illusions. J Southeast Eur Black Sea Stud 2019;19(2):227–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheema S. Here’s why Duterte wants to change “The Philippines” to “Maharlika”. Mashable; 2019.  https://tinyurl.com/7pwtutck. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Chen A. When a populist demagogue takes power. The New Yorker; 2016, Nov 13.  https://tinyurl.com/bbxebm9z. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Cumhuriyet. Erdogan: Karsinizda ne Osmanli'nin hasta adami, ne Cumhuriyet'in comez devleti, ne de 1970'lerin 1990'larin gucsuz ulkesi var. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/b93fn7nm. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Çolak Y. Ottomanism vs. Kemalism: collective memory and cultural pluralism in 1990s Turkey. Middle East Stud 2006;42(4):587–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Botton A. Status anxiety. Vintage; 2004.

  • De Cleen B. Populism and nationalism. In: Rovira Kaltwasser C, Taggart P, Espejo PO, Ostiguy P, editors. The Oxford handbook of populism. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 342–362.

  • Dincsahin S. A symptomatic analysis of the Justice and Development Party’s populism in Turkey, 2007–2010. Gov Oppos 2012;47(4):618–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding I, Hlavac M. Right choice: restorative nationalism and right-wing populism in Central and Eastern Europe. Chi Polit Sci Rev 2017;2(3):427–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergin M, Karakaya Y. Between neo-Ottomanism and Ottomania: navigating state-led and popular cultural representations of the past. New Perspect Turk 2017;56: 33–59.

  • Euronews. Erdogan'dan IMF aciklamasi: Bu can bu tende oldukca onlara esir olmayacagiz. 2019, Feb 12. https://tinyurl.com/mhcbc42d. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Evrensel. Erdogan: New York Times ayni seyi Sultan Abdulhamid'e de yapti. 2015, Jun 3. https://tinyurl.com/vfvcwn8. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Ferrara F. The political development of modern Thailand. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2015.

  • Fukuyama F. Identity: the demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. Straus and Giroux: Farrar; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidron N, Bonikowski B. Varieties of populism: literature review and research agenda. 2013. Working Paper Series, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, No.13–0004. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2459387. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Gidron N, Hall PA. The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right. Br J Sociol 2017;68:57–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz E. Status matters in world politics. Int Stud Rev 2021;23(1):228–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusterson H. From Brexit to Trump: anthropology and the rise of nationalist populism. Am Ethnol. 2017;44(2):209–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacaoglu S. Sultan who raged at the West becomes a hero in Erdogan’s Turkey. Bloomberg; 2018, Mar 19. https://tinyurl.com/sayvbwba. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Halikiopoulou D, Mock S, Vasilopoulou S. The civic zeitgeist: nationalism and liberal values in the European radical right. Nations Nationalism 2013;19(1):107–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haseman JB. The Thai resistance movement during World War II. Bangkok: Silkworm Books; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins K, Selway J. Thaksin the populist? Chi Polit Sci Rev. 2017;2:372–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heydarian R. How America’s return of the Balangiga bells paves the way for Rodrigo Duterte to visit the White House. South China Morning Post; 2018, Dec 23. https://tinyurl.com/re5ef62k. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Hobsbawm E. The age of empire: 1875–1914. New York: Vintage; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurriyet Daily News. Turkish ruling party deputy says “the Ottomans are back”, but “janissaries” protest AKP. 2015, Jan 15. https://tinyurl.com/uv7tp8ds. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Ileto R. Pasyon and revolution: popular movements in the Philippines, 1840–1910. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins G. Erdogan’s generals: from military tutelage to a politicized military. Middle East Institute; 2018.  https://tinyurl.com/8knpedr. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Johnson K. Newly aggressive Turkey forges alliance with Libya. Foreign Policy 2019, Dec 23. https://tinyurl.com/3av2yb55. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Karakaya Y. The conquest of hearts: the central role of Ottoman nostalgia within contemporary Turkish populism. Am J Cult Sociol 2018;8(125):157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyman E, Gumuscu S. Democracy, identity, and foreign policy in Turkey. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014.

  • Laclau E. On populist reason. London: Verso; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson T. Land and loyalty: Security and the development of property rights in Thailand. Singapore: NUS Press; 2013.

  • Lister T. No longer the obedient NATO ally, Erdogan floats nuclear option. CNN; 2019, Oct 21. https://tinyurl.com/y5hhbmbs. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • McCargo D, Ukrist P. The Thaksinization of Thailand. Copenhagen: NIAS; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer J. The great delusion: liberal dreams and international realities. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde C. The populist zeitgeist. Gov Oppos 2004;39(4):541–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde C, Rovira Kaltwasser C. Populism: a very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder N. ‘This God-forsaken country’: Filipino images of the nation. In: Tonnesson S, Antlov H, editors. Asian forms of the nation. London: Curzon; 1998.

  • Müller JW. What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2016.

  • Ngui C. Revisiting Taksin and Thaksin: unceremonious exits and the making of nostalgia in Thai history. Jebat. 2016;43(2):143–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell G. Notes on nationalism. 1945. https://tinyurl.com/wd8at57p/. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Osterhammel J. The transformation of the world: a global history of the 19th century. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özpek BB, Yaşar NT. Populism and foreign policy in Turkey under the AKP rule. Turk Stud 2018;19(2):198–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasuk P, Baker C. Thailand’s crisis. Bangkok: Silkworm; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavin C. Temple of doom: hysteria about the Preah Vihear temple in the Thai nationalist discourse. In: Askew M, editor. Legitimacy crisis in Thailand. Bangkok: Silkworm; 2010.

  • Perry EJ. The populist dream of Chinese democracy. J Asian Stud 2015;74(4):903–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabasa A, Larrabee F. The rise of political Islam in Turkey. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2008.

  • Riker WH. Liberalism against populism: a confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovira Kaltwasser C. The ambivalence of populism: threat and corrective for democracy. Democratization. 2012;19(2):184–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin O. How populists securitize elections to win them: the 2015 double elections in Turkey. New Perspect Turk 2021;64:1–24.

  • Sartori G. Concept misformation in comparative politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 1970;64(4):1033–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher J. Revolutionary clergy: the Filipino clergy and the nationalist movement, 1850–1903. Manila: Ateneo de Manila Press; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sputnik News. Erdogan: Haçlı artıkları, Bizans heveslileri, Neo-Nazi bozuntuları bizi alıkoyamaz. 2019, Mar 19.  https://tinyurl.com/4wv95w7u. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Streckfuss D. Truth on trial in Thailand: defamation, treason, and lese-majeste. New York: Routledge; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart PA. Populism. Philadelphia: Open University Press; 2000.

  • Talabong R. Balangiga bells back in the Philippines. Rappler; 2018, Dec 11. https://tinyurl.com/532fd8ee. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Tang W. Populist authoritarianism: Chinese political culture and regime sustainability. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.

  • Taşpınar O. Turkey: the New Model?. Brookings; 2012, Apr 25. https://www.brookings.edu/research/turkey-the-new-model/. Accessed April 1, 2021.. Accessed April 1, 2021.

  • Teehankee J. Duterte’s resurgent nationalism in the Philippines: a discursive institutionalist analysis. J Curr Southeast Asian Aff 2016;35(3):69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thak C. Thailand: the politics of despotic paternalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiglao G. Duterte’s greatest gift to the nation: the revival of nationalism. Manila Bulletin; 2018.  https://tinyurl.com/vx52d6w8. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Tiglao R. Digong, Catriona electrify our nationalism. Manila Times; 2018.  https://tinyurl.com/y6wtjzz8. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Tombuş HE, Aygenç B. (Post-) Kemalist secularism in Turkey. J Balkan Near Eastern Stud 2017;19(1):70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TRTHaber. Cumhurbaskani Erdogan: Birileri diyor ya 'Suriyeliler gitsin'. 2019, Nov 8. https://tinyurl.com/srweuktf. Accessed 1 April 2021

  • Wimmer A. Waves of war: nationalism, state formation, and ethnic exclusion in the modern world. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyrtzen J. Making Morocco: colonial intervention and the politics of identity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz, MH. Nostalgia for the empire: the politics of neo-Ottomanism. New York: Oxford University Press; 2020.

  • Yıldızalp M. Artik gelecege kilitlenme zamanidir. Anadolu Agency; 2015, Oct 11.  https://tinyurl.com/rea3rjhk. Accessed 1 April 2021.

  • Zakaria, F. The future of freedom: illiberal democracy at home and abroad (Revised Edition). WW Norton & Company; 2007.

  • Zengin H, Korkmaz A. Determinants of Turkey’s foreign aid behavior. New Perspect Turk 2019;60:109–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zengin H, Ongur HÖ. How sovereign is a populist? The nexus between populism and the political economy of the AKP. Turk Stud 2020;21(4):578–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Previous versions of this manuscript were presented at the annual conferences of the American Political Science Association and Social Science History Association, as well as workshops at UCLA, the University of Maryland, and the University of Michigan. For helpful feedback, the authors thank Rogers Brubaker, Ernesto Calvo, Cristian Capotescu, Andrew Chalfoun, Kainan Gao, Marco Garrido, Sima Ghaddar, Kevan Harris, Allen Hicken, Isaac Jilbert, Calvert Jones, Evan Jones, Stathis Kalyvas, Connor Kopchick, John McCauley, Lachlan McNamee, Autumn Perkey, Margaret Peterson, Sean Christopher Rao, Bill Roy, Gabriel Locke Suchodolski, Ashutosh Varshney, Gilad Wenig, Andreas Wimmer, and Andrea Zhu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iza Ding.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, I., Slater, D. & Zengin, H. Populism and the Past: Restoring, Retaining, and Redeeming the Nation. St Comp Int Dev 56, 148–169 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09333-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09333-w

Keywords

  • Populism
  • Nationalism
  • Empire
  • Collective memory
  • Asia