Pathways from the European Periphery: Lessons from the Political Economy of Development

  • Sebastian Dellepiane-Avellaneda
  • Niamh HardimanEmail author
  • George Pagoulatos
  • Spyros Blavoukos


The European economic crisis need not be considered as a problem that is sui generis. Drawing on literature from the political economy of development that centers on finance and monetary policy, we show that the economic vulnerabilities and policy predicaments facing the European periphery share many similarities with problems encountered by middle-income developing countries. Three main concerns guide our discussion: the politics of credible commitment, the significance of state capacity for stabilizing credibility, and the challenges of maintaining democratic legitimacy during times of financial volatility. Our analysis of the dynamics of hard currency pegs and monetary unions draws on lessons from the classic Gold Standard and on more recent experiences of financial crises in emerging markets. We consider how these may apply to the Eurozone periphery, before drawing out some implications for the problems of core–periphery relationships in European Monetary Union.


European periphery Financial crises Emerging markets Credibility of monetary commitments State capacity 


  1. Acena PM, Reis J. Monetary standards in the periphery: paper, silver and gold, 1854–1933. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 1999.Google Scholar
  2. Amsden A. The rise of “the rest”: challenges to the west from late-industrializing economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin R, Giavazzi F. The eurozone crisis: a consensus view of the causes and few possible solutions. eBook,; 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Bardhan P. Scarcity, conflict, and cooperation: essays in the political and institutional economics of development. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  5. Barry F. Economic integration and convergence processes in the EU cohesion countries. J Common Mark Stud. 2003;41:897–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Besley T, Persson T. Pillars of prosperity: the political economics of development clusters. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard O, Rajan R, Rogoff K, Summers LH. Progress and confusion: the state of macroeconomic policy. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  8. Blavoukos S, Pagoulatos G. The limits of EMU conditionality: fiscal adjustment in southern. Eur J Publ Policy. 2008;28:229–53.Google Scholar
  9. Bordo M, Flandreau M. Core, periphery, exchange rate regimes, and globalization. In: Bordo M, Taylor A, Williamson J, editors. Globalization in historical perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2003. p. 417–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyes, R. Iceland’s meltdown: how the global financial crisis bankrupted an entire country. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2010.Google Scholar
  11. Brazys S, Hardiman N. From “Tiger” to “PIIGS”: Ireland and the use of heuristics in comparative political economy. Eur J Polit Res. 2015;54:23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calvo G. Capital flows and capital markets crises: the simple economics of sudden stops. J Appl Econ. 1998;1:35–54.Google Scholar
  13. Calvo G, Reinhart C. Fear of floating. Q J Econ. 2002;117:379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cardoso FH. New paths: globalization in historical perspective. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2009;44:296–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cardoso FH, Faletto E. Dependencia y desarrollo en America Latina. Siglo Veintiuno; 1968/2003.Google Scholar
  16. Chang H-J. Kicking away the ladder: development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem; 2002.Google Scholar
  17. Chang H-J. Bad Samaritans: the guilty secrets of rich nations and the threat to global prosperity. London: Random House Business Books; 2008.Google Scholar
  18. Cingolani L. The state of state capacity: a review of concepts, evidence and measures, MERIT working paper no. 53. Maastricht: United Nations University; 2013.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen B. The geography of money. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  20. Darling A. Back from the brink: 1,000 days at number 11. London: Atlantic Books; 2011.Google Scholar
  21. De Grauwe P. Design failures of the Eurozone. In: Baldwin R, Giavazzi F, editors. The Eurozone crisis: a consensus view of the causes and a few possible remedies. London: CEPR/ VOX; 2015. p. 99–108. Scholar
  22. Della Paolera G, Taylor A. Straining at the anchor: the argentine currency board and the search for macroeconomic stability, 1880–1935. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dellepiane-Avellaneda S. Institutional credible commitments: the political economy of Argentina’s convertibility law, 1991–2001. PhD Dissertation. Colchester, University of Essex; 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Dellepiane-Avellaneda S. Gordon unbound: the heresthetic of central bank independence in Britain. Br J Polit Sci. 2013;43:263–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dellepiane-Avellaneda S. Credibility dilemmas during financial crisis: Greece in the argentine mirror. In: Karyotis G, Gerodimos R, editors. The politics of extreme austerity: Greece in the Eurozone crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2015. p. 198–221.Google Scholar
  26. Dosman E. The life and times of Raul Prebisch, 1901–1986. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  27. Dyson K. States, debt & power: “saints” and “sinners” in European history & integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dyson K, Featherstone K. The road to Maastricht: negotiating economic and monetary union. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eichengreen B. The European economy since 1945: coordinated capitalism and beyond. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  30. Eichengreen B. Globalizing capital: a history of the international monetary system (2nd edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  31. Eichengreen B, Hausmann R. Exchange rates and financial fragility. Washington DC: NBER Working Paper No 7418; 1999.Google Scholar
  32. Etchemendy S. Models of economic liberalization: business, workers, and compensation in Latin America, Spain, and Portugal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Evans P. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  34. Fabbrini S. New institutional dynamics in the European Union. In: Caporaso JA, Rhodes M, editors. The political and economic dynamics of the Eurozone crisis. Oxford University Press: Oxford; 2016. p. 258–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Featherstone K. Conditionality, democracy and institutional weakness: the euro-crisis trilemma. JCMS: J Common Mark Stud. 2016;54(Suppl S1):48–64.Google Scholar
  36. Franco F., editor. Challenges ahead for the Portuguese economy. Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciencias Sociais; 1998.Google Scholar
  37. Geithner T. Stress test: reflections on financial crises. New York: Crown; 2014.Google Scholar
  38. Gourevitch P. The role of politics in economic development. Annu Rev Pol Sci. 2008;11:137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haggard S. Pathways from the periphery: the politics of growth in the newly industrializing countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  40. Hale T, Koenig-Archibugi M. Are Europeans ready for a more democratic European Union? New evidence on preference heterogeneity, polarisation and crosscuttingness. Eur J Polit Res. 2016;55(2):225–45.Google Scholar
  41. Hallerberg M, Strauch R, von Hagen J. Fiscal governance in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hardiman N, Dellepiane-Avellaneda S, Blavoukos S, Pagoulatos G. Austerity in the European periphery: the Irish experience. In: Heffernan E, McHale J, Moore-cherry N, editors. Debating austerity in Ireland. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy; 2017. p. 78–95.Google Scholar
  43. Hausmann R, Panizza U. On the determinants of original sin: an empirical investigation. J Int Money Financ. 2003;22:957–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hirschman A. The essential Hirschman. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  45. IMF Independent Evaluation Office. The IMF and the crises in Greece, Ireland, and Portugal: an evaluation by the independent evaluation office. Washington DC: IMF,; 2016.Google Scholar
  46. Johnston A, Regan A. Global finance, labor politics, and the political economy of housing prices. Polit Soc. 2017;45(3):327–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jones E, Kelemen RD, Meunier S. Failing forward? The euro crisis and the incomplete nature of European integration. Comp Pol Stud. 2016;49(7):1010–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kindleberger C. Comparative political economy: a retrospective. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  49. Krugman P. What’s new about the new economic geography? Oxf Rev Econ Policy. 1998;14:7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lains P. Catching-up to the European core: Portuguese economic growth, 1910–1990. Explor Econ Hist. 2003;40:369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maddison A. The world economy: a millennial perspective. Paris: OECD; 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mahoney J, Thelen K. Introduction: a theory of graduate institutional change. In: Thelen K, editor. Mahoney J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 1–37.Google Scholar
  53. Mair, P. Smaghi versus the parties: representative government and institutional constraints. In: Schaefer A, Streeck W, editors. Politics in the age of austerity, 143-68. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2013: p.143-68.Google Scholar
  54. Mair, P. Ruling the void: the hollowing-out of western democracy. London: Verso; 2014.Google Scholar
  55. Marsh D. The euro: the battle for the new global currency (2nd ed). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  56. Mauro P, editor. Chipping away at public debt: sources of failure and key to success in fiscal adjustment. London: Wiley; 2011.Google Scholar
  57. Mazzucato M. The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs private sector myths. New York: Anthem Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  58. McKay D. The political sustainability of European monetary union. Br J Polit Sci. 1999;29:463–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Merler S, Pisany-Ferry J. Sudden stops in the Euro area. Bruegel Policy Contribution, Issue 2012/06,; 2012.
  60. Moschella M. The institutional roots of incremental ideational change: the IMF and capital controls after the global financial crisis. Br J Polit Int Relat. 2015;17:442–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. North D, Wallis J, Weingast B. Violence and social orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. O’Rourke, K. H. A tale of two trilemmas. Bretton Woods, NH: Institute for New Economic Thinking,; 2011.
  63. Offe C. Europe entrapped. London: Polity Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  64. Ogren A, Oksendal L. The gold standard peripheries: monetary policy, adjustment and flexibility in a global setting. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Polanyi K. The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press; 1944/2001.Google Scholar
  66. Prebisch R. La periferia latinoamericana en el sistema global del capitalismo. In: Prebisch R, Gurrieri A, Weinberg G, editors. Revista de la CEPAL. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas; 1981. p. 163–72.Google Scholar
  67. Rajan RG. Fault lines: How hidden fractures still threaten the world economy. Princeton NJ: Princeton University press; 2010.Google Scholar
  68. Rapoza, K. 19 Reasons why emerging markets belong in your portfolio. Forbes, 7 August;; 2011.
  69. Reinhart C., Rogoff K. This time is different: eight centuries of financial folly, Princeton University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  70. Reinhart C, Rogoff K, Savastano M. Debt intolerance. Brook Pap Econ Act. 2003;34:1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rodrik D. King Kong meets Godzilla: the World Bank and the East Asian miracle. CEPR discussion paper no. 944. London: Center for Economic and Policy Research; 1994.Google Scholar
  72. Rodrik D. Promises, Promises: credible policy reform via signaling. Washington DC: NBER Working Paper No. 2600; 1998a.Google Scholar
  73. Rodrik D. Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflict, and growth collapses. NBER Working Paper No. 1998b;6350Google Scholar
  74. Rodrik D. The globalization paradox: why global markets, states, and democracy can’t coexist. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  75. Ross M. The political economy of the resource curse. World Polit. 1999;51:297–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sandbu M. Europe’s orphan: the future of the euro and the politics of debt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sandholtz W. Choosing union: monetary politics and Maastricht. Int Organ. 1993;47:1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Santiso J. The political economy of emerging markets. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sartori G. Concept misformation in comparative politics. Am Polit Sci Rev. 1970;64:1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Scharpf FW. Monetary union, fiscal crisis and the preemption of democracy. Cologne: MPIfG discussion paper 11/11; 2011.Google Scholar
  81. Scharpf FW. Political legitimacy in a non-optimal currency area. In: Cologne: MPIfG discussion paper 13/15; 2013.Google Scholar
  82. Schmidt VA. The unfinished architecture of Europe’s economic union. Governance. 2010;23:555–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schwartz A. Comment on Bordo M, Flandreau M. Core, periphery, exchange rate regimes, and globalization. In: Bordo M, Taylor A, Williamson J, editors. Globalization in historical perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2003. p.468–472.Google Scholar
  84. Sokol M. Central and Eastern Europe a decade after the fall of state-socialism: regional dimensions of transition processes. Reg Stud. 2000;35:645–55.Google Scholar
  85. Stiglitz J. Some lessons from the east Asian miracle. World Bank Res Obs. 1996;1:151–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Taylor M. The possibility of cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  87. Thelen K. Varieties of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wallerstein I. Dependence in an interdependent world: the limited possibilities of transformation within the capitalist world economy. Afr Stud Rev. 1974;17:1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wolf M. The shifts and the shocks: what weLondon have learned—and have still to learn—from the financial crisis: Allen Lane; 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Dellepiane-Avellaneda
    • 1
  • Niamh Hardiman
    • 2
    Email author
  • George Pagoulatos
    • 3
  • Spyros Blavoukos
    • 3
  1. 1.University of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.University College DublinDublin 4Ireland
  3. 3.Athens University of Economics & BusinessAthinaGreece

Personalised recommendations