Trade, Politics, and the Poor: Is Sen Right and Bhagwati Wrong?


DOI: 10.1007/s12116-016-9231-9

Cite this article as:
Rudra, N. & Tirone, D.C. St Comp Int Dev (2017) 52: 1. doi:10.1007/s12116-016-9231-9


The current debate between two of the world’s finest economists—Amartya Sen and Jagdish Bhagwati—has not only roiled India but also attracted global attention. Is trade liberalization associated with improved welfare outcomes for the poor, as Bhagwati contends? Or is Sen correct that policymakers in liberalizing economies need to change their governance priorities to focus on redistribution? This analysis draws on existing literature to develop testable hypotheses that attempt to resolve the Sen–Bhagwati divide. Using fixed effect panel regressions and simultaneous equation models, we find that although there is empirical support for both arguments, the results on balance favor Sen: The positive relationship between trade and improved poverty is conditional upon more equitable distributions of income. In effect, Bhagwati’s predictions about the beneficial impacts of openness on social welfare occur only in a subset of developing nations, findings which have very different implications for the poor in developing countries.


Income inequality Health Trade International political economy 

Supplementary material

12116_2016_9231_MOESM1_ESM.docx (29 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 29 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GovernmentGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations