Skip to main content

Is Liberal Democracy Feasible in Developing Countries?

Abstract

Liberal democracy has been difficult to institute and sustain in developing countries. This has to do both with ideational factors—the absence of a liberal tradition prior to electoral mobilization—and structural conditions—the prevalence of mass mobilization along identity rather than class cleavages. This paper considers the conditions under which liberal democracy emerges and speculates about its future in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. The evidence that democracy leads to higher growth is generally considered to be weak. However, a recent paper by Acemoglu et al. (2014) makes a strong case that it does.

  2. See, for example, Boix (2003), Acemoglu and Robinson (2009), and Ansell and Samuels (2014).

References

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson J. The economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P, Robinson JA. Democracy does cause growth. NBER Working Paper No. 20004, National Bureau of Economic Research, March 2014.

  • Ansell B, Samuels D. Inequality and democratization: an elite-competition approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boix C. Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond L. Facing up to the democratic recession. J Democr. 2015;26(1):141–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett E. Liberalism: the life of an idea. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone RJ. The South African Bill of Rights. Tex Int Law J. 1977;32(3):460–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch G. A non-competitive pattern of conflict management in liberal democracies: the case of Switzerland, Austria and Lebanon. Paper presented at the Seventh World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Brussels, September 18–23, 1967.

  • Marshall TH. Citizenship and social class. In: Jeff Manza J, Sauder M, editors. Inequality and society. 1949. Reprint, New York: W.W. Norton; 2009.

  • Mukand S, Rodrik D. The political economy of liberal democracy. NBER Working Paper 21540, National Bureau of Economic Research, September 2015. http://www.nber.org/papers/w21540.

  • Rodrik D. Institutions for high-quality growth: what they are and how to acquire them. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2000;35(3):3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D. One economics, many recipes: globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. Premature deindustrialization. NBER Working Paper 20935, National Bureau of Economic Research, February 2015. http://www.nber.org/papers/w20935 (also forthcoming, Journal of Economic Growth).

  • Zakaria, F. The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs 1997; November/December:22–43.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was prepared for the 50th Fiftieth Anniversary Conference of Studies in Comparative International Development, Brown University, October 30, 2015. I am grateful to conference participants, especially Peter Evans and Peter Gourevitch for very helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dani Rodrik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodrik, D. Is Liberal Democracy Feasible in Developing Countries?. St Comp Int Dev 51, 50–59 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-016-9218-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-016-9218-6

Keywords

  • Liberal democracy
  • Developing countries