Social Movements and Social Policy: the Bolivian Renta Dignidad

Abstract

The impact of popular mobilization and social movements against the advance of neoliberal policies has been well documented and theorized. Their concrete impact on the process of social policy reform in the post-neoliberal era is still under debate, however. This article theorizes about the conditions linking disparate new movements to each other and to old, class-based social movements in the defense of a concrete policy reform, Bolivia’s non-contributory pension, the Renta Dignidad. Using a case study research design built on content analysis of newspaper coverage, we identify the necessary, though not sufficient, conditions facilitating alignment of interests and coordinated mobilization—a context of adversity (as confronting a highly mobilized opposition) and the universalistic characteristics of the policy. Under those conditions, social movements allied with Bolivia’s governing Movement Towards Socialism (MAS) were critical in the passage of Renta Dignidad by counterbalancing the pressure from a highly mobilized opposition backed by strong economic elites.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    New movements also make material demands. Old movements, in turn, cannot be reduced to solely material dimensions; for example, they combine class struggles with cross-class aspects of identity. See Eckstein and Wickham-Crowley (2002).

  2. 2.

    Neoliberal reforms, moreover, were resisted by popular sector movements, such as indigenous movements in Bolivia, landless rural workers in Brazil, rural social movements in Costa Rica and Peru, the unemployed in Argentina, and women’s organizations (as the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo in Argentina and the Bartolina Sisa women farmers’ organization in Bolivia), among many others (Ondetti 2008; Edelman 1999; Arce 2008; Garay 2010; Silva 2009).

  3. 3.

    See Niedzwiecki (2015) for an exception.

  4. 4.

    Tenorio (2014) and Niedzwiecki (2015) are partial exceptions by analyzing the effect of organized labor on aggregate social spending in Latin America.

  5. 5.

    We would expect El Deber to under-report pro-government mobilizations. That newspaper is known for its strong connections to economic elites and business interests in the Santa Cruz region, its alignment with regionalist parties and autonomy movements, and its antagonistic position against the central government.

  6. 6.

    We do not include the number of participants in each mobilization because this information is not systematic across the newspapers. However, we do include the number of people who participated in the event in the text if that information is available.

  7. 7.

    Our focus is neither on the process through which the issue enters the legislative agenda nor on the position of individual legislators. We focus on the dynamics of social mobilization in the streets, which affected the design, passing, and implementation of the policy.

  8. 8.

    For a description of indigenous territories in Bolivia, see Hooghe et al. (forthcoming).

References

  1. Amenta E, Caren N, Chiarello E, Su Y. The political consequences of social movements. Annu Rev Sociol. 2010;36(June):287–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amenta E, Carruthers B, Zylan Y. A hero for the aged? The Townsend Movement, the political mediation model, and US old-age policy, 1934-1950. Am J Sociol. 1992;98(2):308–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews K. Social movements and policy implementation: the Mississippi civil rights movement and the war on poverty, 1965 to 1971. Am Sociol Rev. 2001;66:71–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anria S. Bolivia’s MAS: between party and movement. In: Cameron MA, Hershberg E, editors. Latin America’s left turns: politics, policies, and trajectories of change. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2010. p. 101–26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anria S. Social movements, party organization, and populism: insights from the Bolivian MAS. Lat Am Polit Soc. 2013;55(3):19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anria S. Social movements, parties, and the left in Latin America: the Bolivian MAS in comparative perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Political Science. UNC Chapel Hill; 2015.

  7. Arce M. The repoliticization of collective action after neoliberalism in Peru. Lat Am Polit Soc. 2008;50(3):37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arce M, Bellinger P. Low-intensity democracy revisited: the effects of economic liberalization on political activity in Latin America. World Polit. 2007;60(1):97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arza C. Towards a rights-based policy? The expansions of old-age pensions in Latin America? Paper presented at RC19, ISA, Buenos Aires, 1-4 August; 2012.

  10. Brooks SM. Social protection and the market in Latin America: the transformation of social security institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cameron M, Hershberg E. Latin America’s left turns: politics, policies, and trajectories of change. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crabtree, John. 2011. Electoral validation for Morales and the MAS. In: Evo Morales and the Movimiento Al Socialismo in Bolivia: the first term in context, 117–142. Ed. Adrian Pearce. London: Institute for the Study of the Americas

  13. Diani M. Organizational fields and social movement dynamics. In: van Stekelenburg J, Roggeband C, Klandermans B, editors. The future of social movement research. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2012. p. 145–68.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eaton K. Backlash in Bolivia: regional autonomy as a reaction against indigenous mobilization. Polit Soc. 2007;35(1):71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eckstein S, Wickham-Crowley TP, editors. Struggles for social rights in Latin America. New York: Routledge; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edelman M. Peasants against globalization: rural social movements in Costa Rica. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Escobar A. The making of social movements in Latin America: identity, strategy, and democracy. Sonia Alvarez. Boulder: Westview Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fairfield T. Private wealth and public revenue in Latin America: business power and tax politics. Cambridge University Press; 2015.

  20. Foweraker J. Theorizing social movements. Pluto Press; 1995.

  21. Gamson WA. The strategy of social protest. Belmont: Wasdworth; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ganz M. Why David sometimes wins: leadership, organization, and strategy in the California farm worker movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garay C. Including outsiders. social policy expansion in Latin America. PhD Dissertation: University of California, Berkeley; 2010.

  24. García Linera Á. Bolivia’s vice-president. Author interview. La Paz, 4 May; 2013.

  25. von Gersdorff H. Pension reform in Bolivia: innovative solutions to common problems. World Bank (July); 1997.

  26. Goertz G, Mahoney J. A tale of two cultures. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Haggard S, Kaufman R. Development, democracy, and welfare states: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hooghe L, Marks G, Chapman Osterkatz S, Niedzwiecki S, Schakel A, Shair-Rosenfield S. Measuring regional authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Huber E, Niedzwiecki S. Emerging welfare states in Latin America and East Asia. In: Leibfried S, Nullmeier F, Huber E, Lange M, Levy J, Stephens JD, editors. The oxford handbook of transformations of the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 796–812.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Huber E, Stephens J. Development and crisis of the welfare state. Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2001.

  31. Huber E, Stephens J. Democracy and the left. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jenkins C, Klandermans B. The politics of social protest : comparative perspectives on states and social movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kaufman R, Nelson J. Introduction: the political challenges of social sector reform. In: Kaufman R, Nelson J, editors. Crucial needs, weak incentives: social sector reform, democratization, and globalization in Latin America. D.C: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kurtz M. Free market democracy and the Chilean and Mexican countryside. Cambridge University Press; 2004.

  35. Levitsky S, Roberts K. Introduction: Latin America’s ‘left turn’: a framework for analysis. In: Levitsky S, Roberts K, editors. The resurgence of the Latin American left. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2011. p. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Madrid R. Retiring the state: the politics of pension privatization in Latin America and beyond. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Madrid R. Bolivia: origins and policies of the Movimiento al Socialismo. In: Levitsky S, Roberts K, editors. The resurgence of the Latin American left. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2011. p. 239–59.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mesa-Lago C. Social security in Latin America: pressure groups, stratification, and inequality. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Meyer D, Tarrow S. A movement society: contentious politics for a new century. In: Meyer D, Tarrow S, editors. The social movement society: contentious politics for a new century. Lahnham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 1998. p. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Müller K. Contested universalism: from bonosol to renta dignidad in Bolivia. Int J Soc Welf. 2009;18(2):163–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Niedzwiecki S. The effect of unions and organized civil society on social policy. Pension and health reforms in Argentina and Brazil (1988-2008). Lat Am Polit Soc. 2014;56(4):22–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Niedzwiecki S. Social policy commitment in South America: the effect of organized labor on social spending from 1980 to 2010. J Polit Lat Am. 2015;7(2):3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Niedzwiecki S. Social policies, attribution of responsibility, and political alignments. A subnational analysis of Argentina and Brazil. In Comparative Political Studies Online First; 2015. doi:10.1177/0010414015612392.

  44. Ondetti G. Land, protest, and politics: the landless movement and the struggle for agrarian reform in Brazil. Penn State Press; 2008.

  45. Oxhorn P. Review: from human rights to citizenship rights? Recent trends in the study of Latin American social movements. Lat Am Res Rev. 2001;36(3):163–82.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pribble J. Welfare and party politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Roberts K. Deepening democracy? The modern left and social movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.

  48. Roberts K. Social inequalities without class cleavages in Latin America’s neoliberal era. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2002;36(4):3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Roberts K. The mobilization of opposition to economic liberalization. Ann Rev Polit Sci. 2008;11(1):327–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sartori G. Parties and party systems. A framework for analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1976.

  51. Silva E. Challenging neoliberalism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tarrow S. Power in movement: social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tenorio BZ. Social spending responses to organized labor and mass protests in Latin America, 1970-2007. Comp Polit Stud. 2014;47(14):1945–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Weyland K, Madrid R, Hunter W. Leftist governments in Latin America: successes and shortcomings. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zegada MT, Torrez Y, Camara G. Movimientos Sociales En Tiempos De Poder: Articulaciones y Campos De Conflicto En El Gobierno Del MAS (2006-2007). La Paz: Plural Editores; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zuazo M. ¿Cómo Nació El MAS? La Ruralización De La Política En Bolivia: Entrevistas a 85 Parlamentarios Del Partido. Fundación Ebert: La Paz; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to especially thank Evelyne Huber for her constant guidance and very helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. John D. Stephens, Camila Arza, and the editors and two anonymous reviewers of SCID also provided excellent feedback. María Florencia Bergez compiled the newspaper articles used in this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Niedzwiecki.

Additional information

Santiago Anria and Sara Niedzwiecki are equal contributors to this article.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 21.3 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anria, S., Niedzwiecki, S. Social Movements and Social Policy: the Bolivian Renta Dignidad. St Comp Int Dev 51, 308–327 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-015-9207-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social policy
  • Social movements
  • Latin America
  • Bolivia