Advertisement

Studies in Comparative International Development

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 304–330 | Cite as

Democracy and State Capacity: Complements or Substitutes?

  • Jonathan K. Hanson
Article

Abstract

When it comes to social welfare, we do not have clear understanding of whether it is more important to have democracy or a capable state. Specifically, most studies do not consider the possibility that effects of democracy are conditioned or obscured by differences in the capabilities of states to deliver services effectively. This article contends that better developmental outcomes can result from either democracy or state capacity, but the combination of high levels of both democracy and state capacity is not synergistic. Empirical evidence from a time-series-cross-sectional dataset covering up to 162 countries during the 1965–2010 time period supports the conclusion that these factors partially substitute for each other with respect to improving outcomes in school enrollment and infant mortality. These findings provide a more optimistic answer to the query of Ross (Am J Polit Sci 50(4): 860–874, 2006) as to whether democracy is good for the poor. Once accounting for state capacity, we find that democracy leads to better development outcomes.

Keywords

Democracy State capacity Public services Development 

Supplementary material

12116_2014_9173_MOESM1_ESM.ps (1.7 mb)
ESM 1 (PS 1767 kb)

References

  1. Abeyratne S. Economic roots of political conflict: the case of Sri Lanka. World Econ. 2004;27(8):1295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Robinson JA. Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  3. Avelino G, Brown DS, Hunter W. The effects of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980–1999. Am J Polit Sci. 2005;49(3):625–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bäck H, Hadenius A. Democracy and state capacity: exploring a J-shaped relationship. Gov Int J Policy Admin Inst. 2008;21(1):1–24.Google Scholar
  5. Bierschenk T. Democratization without development: Benin 1989–2009. Int J Polit Cult Soc. 2009;22(3):337–57.Google Scholar
  6. Björkman J. Health policy and politics in Sri Lanka: developments in the South Asian welfare state. Asian Surv. 1985;25(5):537–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaydes L, Kayser MA. Counting calories: democracy and distribution in the developing world. Int Stud Q. 2011;55(4):887–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bockstette V, Chanda A, Putterman L. States and markets: the advantage of an early start. J Econ Growth. 2002;7:347–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boix C, Miller M, Rosato S. A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comp Polit Stud. 2013;46(12):1523–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brambor T, Clark WR, Golder M. Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Polit Anal. 2006;14(1):63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bratton M, Chang EC. State building and democratization in sub-Saharan Africa: forwards, backwards, or together? Comp Polit Stud. 2006;39(9):1059–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brehm J, Gates S. Working, shirking and sabotage: bureaucratic response to a democratic public. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Brown DS, Hunter W. Democracy and human capital formation: education spending in Latin America, 1980 to 1997. Comp Polit Stud. 2004;37(7):842–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bueno de Mesquita B, Smith A, Siverson RM, Morrow JD. The logic of political survival. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  15. Caporaso JA. The state’s role in third world economic growth. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci. 1982;459:103–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Centeno M. Limited wars and limited states. In: Davis D, editor. Irregular armed forces and their role in politics and state formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  17. Chanda A, Putterman L. State effectiveness, economic growth, and the age of states. In: Lange M, Rueschemeyer D, editors. States and development: historical antecedents of stagnation and advance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.Google Scholar
  18. Dahl RA. Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1971.Google Scholar
  19. Deaton A. The great escape: health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  20. Diyen H. Reform of secondary education in Morocco: challenges and prospects. Prospects. 2004;34(2):211–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dossou-Yovo N. The experience of Benin. Int J World Peace. 1999;16(3):59–74.Google Scholar
  22. Engel J, Magloire Cossou E, Rose P. Benin’s progress in education: expanding access and narrowing the gender gap. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2011.Google Scholar
  23. Englebert P. Pre-colonial institutions, post-colonial states, and economic development in tropical Africa. Polit Res Q. 2000;53(1):7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franzese RJ. Macroeconomic policies of developed democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frey R, Al-Roumi A. Political democracy and the physical quality of life: the cross-national evidence. Soc Indic Res. 1999;47(1):73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gains F, John P. What do bureaucrats like doing? Bureaucratic preferences in response to institutional reform. Public Adm Rev. 2010;70(3):455–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gandhi J. Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Handy PS. Chad: wading through a domestic political crisis in a turbulent region. Situation Report: Institute for Security Studies; 2007.Google Scholar
  29. Herbst J. States and power in Africa: comparative lessons in authority and control. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  30. Heston A, Summers R, Aten B. Penn world table version 6.3. University of Pennsylvania Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices; 2009.Google Scholar
  31. Hicken A, Simmons JW. The personal vote and the efficacy of education spending. Am J Polit Sci. 2008;52(1):109–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. House F. Freedom in the world country ratings: 1972 to 2007. Washington, DC: Freedom House; 2008.Google Scholar
  33. Joffe G. Morocco: monarchy, legitimacy and succession. Third World Q. 1988;10(1):201–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kagbe R. Education in Chad: in a state of decline. openDemocracy 2012.Google Scholar
  35. Kaufman RR, Segura-Ubiergo A. Globalization, domestic politics and social spending in Latin America: a time-series cross-section analysis, 1973–97. World Polit. 2001;53(4):553–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keefer P. The political economy of growth and diversification in Benin. Unpublished Manuscript. The World Bank: Development Research Group; 2008a.Google Scholar
  37. Keefer P. Political market imperfections, clientelism and the quality of democracy. Working Paper 2008/3. Central European University: Center for the Study of Imperfections in Democracy (DISC); 2008b.Google Scholar
  38. Kelegama S. Development in independent Sri Lanka: what went wrong? Econ Polit Wkly. 2000;35(17):1477–90.Google Scholar
  39. Khaleghian P. Decentralization and public services: the case of immunization. Policy Research Working Paper 2989. The World Bank; 2003.Google Scholar
  40. Lake DA, Baum MA. The invisible hand of democracy: political control and the provision of public services. Comp Polit Stud. 2001;34(6):587–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Linz JJ, Stepan A. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  42. Magnusson BA. Democratization and domestic insecurity: navigating the transition in Benin. Comp Polit. 2001;33(2):211–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mangla A. Bureaucratic norms and state capacity: implementing primary education in India’s Himalayan region. Working Paper 14-099. Harvard Business School; 2014.Google Scholar
  44. Mann M. The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms, and results. Eur J Sociol. 1984;25(2):185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marsh D, Smith MJ, Richards D. Bureaucrats, politicians and reform in Whitehall: analysing the bureau-shaping model. Br J Polit Sci. 2000;30(3):461–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marshall MG, Jaggers K. (2009). Polity IV project: dataset users’ manual. George Mason University: Center for Systemic Peace; 2009.Google Scholar
  47. McGuire JW. Wealth, health, and democracy in East Asia and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moon BE, Dixon WJ. Politics, the state, and basic human needs: a cross-national study. Am J Polit Sci. 1985;29(4):661–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Munck GL, Verkuilen J. Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: evaluating alternative indicies. Comp Polit Stud. 2002;35(1):5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nelson JM. Democratic politics and pro-poor social services: unpacking the concept of “reform”. In: Devarajan S, Widlund I, editors. The politics of service delivery in democracies: better access for the poor. Stockholm: Expert Group on Development Issues, Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Sweden; 2007a.Google Scholar
  51. Nelson JM. Elections, democracy, and social services. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2007b;41(4):79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Niskanen WA. Bureaucracy and representative government. Atherton: Aldine; 1971.Google Scholar
  53. Oberst RC. Federalism and ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka. Publius. 1988;18(3):175–93.Google Scholar
  54. Pemstein D, Meserve SA, Melton J. Democratic compromise: a latent variable analysis of ten measures of regime type. Polit Anal. 2010;18(4):426–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Plümper T, Troeger VE. Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Polit Anal. 2007;15(2):124–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rose R, Shin D. Democratization backwards: the problem of third-wave democracies. Br J Polit Sci. 2001;31(2):331–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ross ML. Is democracy good for the poor? Am J Polit Sci. 2006;50(4):860–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sandbrook R. The state and economic stagnation in tropical Africa. World Dev. 1986;14(3):319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sater JN. Parliamentary elections and authoritarian rule in Morocco. Middle East J. 2009;63(3):381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seely JC. The legacies of transition governments in Africa: the cases of Benin and Togo. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sen A. Development as freedom. New York: Anchor; 1999.Google Scholar
  62. Soifer HD. State power and the economic origins of democracy. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2013;48(1):1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Soifer H, vom Hau M. Unpacking the strength of the state: the utility of state infrastructural power. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2008;43(3/4):219–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stasavage D. Democracy and education spending in Africa. Am J Polit Sci. 2005;49(2):343–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tendler J. Good government in the tropics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  66. The Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. CME Info Dataset. United Nations Children’s Fund; 2010.Google Scholar
  67. Tilly C. Western state-making and theories of political transformation. In: Tilly C, editor. The formation of national states in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1975.Google Scholar
  68. Wilson JW. Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books; 1989.Google Scholar
  69. Wintrobe R. The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. World Bank. Project appraisal document on a proposed credit in the amount of SDR 31 million to the Republic of Chad for a health sector support project. Technical Report No: 20189-CD, The World Bank: Africa Regional Office; 2000.Google Scholar
  71. World Bank. World development report 2004: making services work for poor people. Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  72. World Bank. Kingdom of Morocco. Health policy note towards a more equitable and sustainable health care system: policy challenges and opportunities. Policy Note (P104274). Middle East and North Africa Social and Human Development Group; 2007.Google Scholar
  73. World Bank. World development indicators (WDI Online). Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2010 and 2011.Google Scholar
  74. World Bank. Project appraisal document on a proposed credit in the amount of SDR 10 million to the Republic of Chad for an education sector reform project phase ii. Report No: 77950-TD. International Development Association; 2013.Google Scholar
  75. Ziblatt D. Why some cities provide more public goods than others: a subnational comparison of the provision of public goods in German cities in 1912. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2008;43(3–4):273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Syracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations