Democracy, Governance, and Emigration Intentions in Latin America and the Caribbean

  • Jonathan HiskeyEmail author
  • Jorge Daniel Montalvo
  • Diana Orcés


It is now clear that the global shift toward democracy in recent decades has resulted in a highly uneven democratic landscape in which the quality and performance of democracies around the world vary greatly. In an era characterized by increasingly open borders to goods, services, information, and, at times, labor, we argue that poorly performing, uneven democracies have become an important, yet underexplored, component in one’s emigration calculus. We test this argument through analysis of survey data across 22 Latin American countries and find strong and consistent evidence that both the quality of a democratic system and its ability to fulfill basic governance responsibilities influence the degree to which an individual considers emigration as a viable life strategy. These findings in turn have implications for the subsequent impact emigration may have on the democratic development of high migration communities.


Democracy Governance Latin America Migration 



The authors would like to thank Javier Aparicio and Covadonga Meseguer for organizing and inviting us to be a part of the “Politics and Migration in Out-Migration Countries” workshop from which we received tremendous feedback on this work from all of the participants. We would also like to thank Katrina Burgess and Covadonga Meseguer for their tireless work as editors of this collection of works, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.


  1. Afolayan AA. Issues and challenges of emigration dynamics in developing countries. Int Migr. 2001;39(4).Google Scholar
  2. Armony AC, Schamis HE. Babel in democratization studies. J Democr. 2005;16(14):114–28.Google Scholar
  3. Borjas GJ. Economic theory and international migration. Int Migr Rev. 1989;23:457–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, Ximena, Timothy J. Hatton, and Jeffery G. Williamson. 2003. What explains cross-border migration in Latin America? Discussion Paper 2012, Harvard Institute of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  5. Diamond LJ. Consolidating democracy in the Americas. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci. 1997;550:12–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diamond LJ. Developing democracy: toward consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Durand J, Massey DS, Charvet F. The changing geography of Mexican immigration to the United States: 1910–1996. Soc Sci Q. 2000;81:1–15.Google Scholar
  8. Fleck, Robert K. and Andrew F. Hanssen. 2005. “How bad can a government be? Neighborhood constraints and the quality of national governments.” Accessed 18 Dec 2007.
  9. Gersony R. Why Somalis flee: a synthesis of conflict experience in northern Somalia by Somali refugees, displaced person and others. Int J Refug Law. 1990;2(1):4–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gervasoni C. A rentier theory of subnational regimes: fiscal federalism, democracy, and authoritarianism in the Argentine provinces. World Polit. 2010;62(2):302–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibney MJ. The ethics and politics of asylum: liberal democracy and the response to refugees. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson EL. Boundary control: subnational authoritarianism in democratic countries. World Polit. 2005;58(1):101–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodman G, Hiskey J. Exit without leaving: political disengagement in high migration municipalities in Mexico. Comp Polit. 2008;40(2):169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton N, Chinchilla NS. Central American migration: a framework for analysis. Lat Am Res Rev. 1991;26(1).Google Scholar
  15. Helton AC. The price of indifference: refugees and humanitarian action in the new century. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herbst J. Migration, the politics of protest, and state consolidation in Africa. Afr Aff. 1990;89(355):183–203.Google Scholar
  17. Hirschman AO. Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1970.Google Scholar
  18. Hirschman A. Exit, voice and the state. World Polit. 1978;31(no. 1):17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirschman AO. Exit, voice, and the fate of the German democratic republic: an essay in conceptual history. World Polit. 1993;45(2):173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hiskey JT. Demand-based development and local electoral environments in Mexico. Comp Polit. 2005;36(1):41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffman, Bert. 2005. Emigration and regime stability: explaining the persistence of Cuban socialism. Working Papers Global and Area Studies, No. 2. Hamburg: German Overseas Institute, Institute for Ibero-American Studies.Google Scholar
  22. Huber E, Rueschemeyer D, Stephens JD. The paradoxes of contemporary democracy: formal, participatory, and social dimensions. Comp Polit. 1997;29(3):323–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson GB, Crisp BF. Mandates, powers, and policies. Am J Polit Sci. 2003;47(1):128–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kapur D. Diaspora, development, and democracy: the domestic impact of international migration from India. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  25. Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Pablo Zoido-Lobatón. 1999. Governance matters. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. No. 2196: 1–61.Google Scholar
  26. Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. 2005. Governance matters IV: governance indicators for 1996–2004. World Bank Policy Research Paper, No. 3630: 1–60.Google Scholar
  27. Kurtz MJ. The dilemmas of democracy in the open economy: lessons from Latin America. World Polit. 2004;56(1):262–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawson C. Mexico’s unfinished transition: democratization and authoritarian enclaves in Mexico. Mex Stud/Estud Mex. 2000;16(2):267–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levitsky, Steven and Lucan A. Way. The rise of competitive authoritarianism. J. Democ. 2002;13(2):51–65.Google Scholar
  30. Lundquist JH, Massey DS. Politics or economics? International migration during the Nicaraguan Contra war. J Lat Am Stud. 2005;37:29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lustig, Nora. 2000. Crises and the poor: socially responsible macroeconomics. Sustainable Development Department Technical Papers Series, POV 108. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development BankGoogle Scholar
  32. Massey D. Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Popul Index. 1990;56:3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Massey DS, Goldring LP, Durand J. Continuities in transnational migration: an analysis of nineteen communities. Am J Sociol. 1994;102:939–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Massey D, Arango J, Hugo G, Kouacouci A, Pellegrino A, Edward Taylor J. Worlds in motion: understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Oxford: Clarendon; 1998.Google Scholar
  35. Massey DS, Durand J, Malone NJ. Beyond smoke and mirrors: Mexican immigration in an era of economic integration. New York: Russell Sage; 2003.Google Scholar
  36. McFaul M. The fourth wave of democracy and dictatorship: noncooperative transitions in the postcommunist world. World Polit. 2002;54(1):212–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mishler W, Rose R. Political support for incomplete democracies: realist vs. idealist theories and measures. Int Polit Sci Rev. 2001;22(4):303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Donnell G. Why the rule of law matters. J Democr. 2004;15(4):32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pérez-Liñán A. Presidential impeachment and the new political instability in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pfaff S, Kim H. Exit-voice dynamics in collective action: an analysis of emigration and protest in the East German revolution. Am J Sociol. 2003;109(2):401–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Portes A, Hoffman K. Latin american class structures: their composition and change during the neoliberal era. Lat Am Res Rev. 2003;39.Google Scholar
  42. Rodrik D. Participatory politics, social cooperation, and economic stability. Am Econ Rev. 2000;90(2):140–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schedler A. “What is democratic consolidation? J Democr. 1998;9(2):91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seligson MA. The measurement and impact of corruption victimization: survey evidence from Latin America. World Dev. 2006;34(2):381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stanley WD. Economic migrants or refugees from violence? A time-series analysis of Salvadoran migration to the United States. Lat Am Res Rev. 1987;22(1):132–54.Google Scholar
  46. Stark O. The migration of labor. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell; 1991.Google Scholar
  47. Taylor JE. Undocumented Mexico–US migration and the returns to households in rural Mexico. Am J Agric Econ. 1987;69:626–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tiebout CM. A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ. 1956;64(5):416–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wood CH, Gibson CL, Ribeiro L, Hamsho-Diaz P. Crime victimization in Latin America and intentions to migrate to the United States. Am J Sociol. 2010;102:939–99.Google Scholar
  50. World Bank. Global economic prospects: crisis, finance, and growth 2010. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Hiskey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jorge Daniel Montalvo
    • 2
  • Diana Orcés
    • 1
  1. 1.Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Universidad de San Francisco de QuitoQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations