Studies in Comparative International Development

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 432–456 | Cite as

European Reactions to the 2008 Georgian–Russian War: Assessing the Impact of Gas Dependence

Article

Abstract

Western observers and policymakers have voiced anxiety about Europe’s increasing dependence on Russian natural gas fueling Russian imperial ambitions. In 2008, speculation appeared to become reality, as war broke out between Russia and its post-Soviet, but Western-leaning neighbor, Georgia. But did a country’s dependence on Russian natural gas influence its politicians’ responses to the Georgian–Russian war? An analysis of the voting behavior in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe provides insight into conventional claims that a reliance on Russian energy dampens the willingness of European states to publicly criticize Russia.

Keywords

Natural gas Energy politics Council of Europe PACE Russia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Levy Odera and Jon Whooley for their research assistance as well as Tom Remington and the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Alesina A, Dollar D. Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? J Econ Growth. 2000;5:33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison R. Russia resurgent? Moscow’s campaign to ‘coerce Georgia to peace’. Int Aff. 2008;84:1145–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amnesty International Says Khodorkovsky not a ‘prisoner of conscience’. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (May 20) 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Applegren B, Klohn W. Management of water scarcity: a focus on social capacities. Phys Chem Earth. 1999;24:361–73.Google Scholar
  5. Åslund A. Gazprom: challenged giant in need of reform. Russia after the global economic crisis. In: Åslund A, Guriev S, and Kuchins A, editors. Russia after the Global Economic Crisis. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics and Center for Strategic and International Studies; 2010:151–68.Google Scholar
  6. Bahgat G. Europe’s energy security: challenges and opportunities. Int Aff. 2006;82:961–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balmaceda MM. Corruption, intermediary companies, and energy security. Problems of post-communism. 2008; 4(July/August):16–28.Google Scholar
  8. Barbieri K, Keshk O. Correlates of War Project Trade Data Set Codebook, Version 3.0. 2012. At http://correlatesofwar.org. Accessed 8 March 2012.
  9. Barbieri K, Keshk OMG, Pollins B. Trading data: evaluating our assumptions and coding rules. Confl Manag Peace Sci. 2009;26:471–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beauguitte L. ‘Multiscalar approaches of voting behaviour of European countries in the United Nations General Assembly’ (Paper presented at the Fifth European Consortium for Political Research, Potsdam, Germany 2009). August 4, 2011.Google Scholar
  11. Bilgin M. Energy security and Russia’s gas strategy: the symbiotic relationship between the state and firms. Communist Post-Communist Stud. 2011;44:119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bosse G. The EU, geopolitical vision of a European energy space: when ‘Gulliver’ meets ‘white elephants’ and Verdi’s Babylonian King. Geopolitcs. 2011;16:512–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowring B. Russia’s relations with the Council of Europe under increasing strain. EU-Russia Centre; 2007.Google Scholar
  14. Bowring B. Tensions multiply between Russia and Council of Europe: could the malaise be terminal? EU-Russia Rev. 2008;6:4–12.Google Scholar
  15. Casier T. The rise of energy to the top of the EU-Russia agenda: from interdependence to dependence? Geopolitics. 2011;16:536–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Closson S. A comparative analysis on energy subsidies in Soviet and Russian policy. Communist Post-Communist Stud. 2011;44:343–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cornell SE, Star SF, editors. The guns of August 2008: Russia’s war in Georgia. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe; 2009.Google Scholar
  18. Council of Europe. Recommendation 1846 (2008). The consequences of the war between Georgia and Russia. At http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/AdoptedText/ta08/EREC1846.htm. Accessed 8 Nov 2011.
  19. Council of Europe. Verbatim records, fourth part session; 2008.Google Scholar
  20. Council of the European Union. Report filed by Council of the European Union’s Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia (IIFFMCG-CEIIG) headed by Ambassador Heidi Tagliavini.Google Scholar
  21. Crawford G. Foreign aid and political conditionality: issues of effectiveness and consistency. Democratization. 1997;4:69–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crawford, G. Foreign aid and political reform. A comparative analysis of democracy assistance and political conditionality, New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2001.Google Scholar
  23. Daly, J. Ukraine to become shale gas superpower? 2013. Oilprice.com. Accessed 8 March 2013.
  24. Dunning T. Crude democracy: natural resource wealth and political regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  25. Fawn R. Encouraging the incorrigible? Russia’s relations with the west over Chechnya. J Communist Stud Transit Polit. 2002;18:3–20.Google Scholar
  26. Finon D, Locatelli C. Russian and European gas interdependence: could contractual trade channel geopolitics. Energy Policy. 2008;36:423–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldthau A. Rhetoric versus reality: Russian threats to European energy supply. Energy Policy. 2008;36:686–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gonchar M, Martyniuk V, Prystayko O. Gas conflict and its consequences for the European energy security. EU-Russia Energy Relat. 2009;9:30–47.Google Scholar
  29. Green Paper, Towards a European strategy for the security of energy supply. Commission of the European Communities Luxembourg Office for Official Publications; 2001.Google Scholar
  30. Haber S, Menaldo V. Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse. Am Pol Sci Rev. 2011;105:1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill F. Energy Empire: Oil, gas and Russia’s revival. Report for the Foreign Policy Centre; 2004.Google Scholar
  32. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2009. Washington: OECD Publishing; 2009a.Google Scholar
  33. International Energy Agency. Natural gas information 2005. Washington: OECD Publishing; 2006.Google Scholar
  34. International Energy Agency. Natural gas information 2006. Washington: OECD Publishing; 2007.Google Scholar
  35. International Energy Agency. Natural gas information 2007. Washington: OECD Publishing; 2008.Google Scholar
  36. International Energy Agency. Natural gas information 2008. Washington: OECD Publishing; 2009b.Google Scholar
  37. International Energy Agency. Natural gas information 2009. Washington: OECD Publishing; 2010.Google Scholar
  38. International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Database April 2011.Google Scholar
  39. International Trade Center. Trade Map. 2004–2008. At http://www.trademap.org. Accessed 8 March 2012.
  40. Ivanenko V, Schlesinger B. Political economy of shale gas industry in Eastern Europe. Int Assoc Energy Econ. 2012;1:9–13.Google Scholar
  41. Jansen T, van Lier A, van Witteloostuijn A, von Ochssee TB. A modified Cournot model of the natural gas market in the European Union: mixed-motives delegation in a politicized environment. Energy Policy. 2012;41:280–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson D. EU–Russian energy links: a marriage of convenience? Gov Opp. 2005;40:256–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kalyvitis S, Vlachaki I. When does more aid imply less democracy? An empirical examination. Eur J Polit Econ. 2012;28:132–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kazantsev A. The crisis of Gazprom as the crisis of Russia’s ‘energy super-state’ policy towards Europe and the former Soviet Union Caucasian Review of International Affairs. 2010;4(3):271–284.Google Scholar
  45. Knack S. Aid dependence and the quality of governance: cross-country empirical tests. South Econ J. 2001;68(2):310–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kovačovská L. European Union’s energy (in)security: dependence on Russia. Def Strateg. 2007;2:5–21.Google Scholar
  47. Kropatcheva E. Playing both ends against the middle: Russia’s geopolitical energy games with the EU and Ukraine. Geopolitics. 2011;16(3):553–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Larsson R.L. Russia’s energy policy: security dimensions and Russia’s reliability as an energy supplier. Swedish Defence Research Agency; 2006.Google Scholar
  49. Le Coq C, Paltseva E. Measuring the security of external energy supply in the European Union. Energy Policy. 2009;37:4474–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lobjakas A. EU blinks as Russia holds its gaze. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty August 31, 2008.Google Scholar
  51. Mahdavy H. The patterns and problems of economic development in rentier states: the case of Iran. In: Cook MA, editor. Studies in the economic history of the Middle East. London: Oxford University Press; 1970. p. 428–67.Google Scholar
  52. Malfliet K, Parmentier, S. Russia’s membership of the Council of Europe: ten years after. Malfliet K, Parmentier S. eds. Russia and the Council of Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010a:7–29.Google Scholar
  53. Malfliet K, Parmentier S. By Way of Introduction. Malfliet K, Parmentier S. eds. Russia and the Council of Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010b:1–6.Google Scholar
  54. Mares M, Larys M. Oil and natural gas in Russia’s eastern strategy: dream or reality? Energy Policy. 2012;50:436–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McAllister I, White S. ‘It’s the economy, comrade!’ Parties and voters in the 2007 Russian Duma election. Europe-Asia Stud. 2008;60(6):931–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McCalla AF. Prospects for food security in the 21st century: with special emphasis on Africa. Agric Econ. 1999;20(2):95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McFaul M, Stoner-Weiss K. The myth of the authoritarian model. Foreign Affairs. 2008;87:68–84.Google Scholar
  58. McGowan F. Putting energy insecurity into historical context: European responses to the energy crises of the 1970s and 2000s. Geopolitics. 2011;16(3):486–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Merlin A. Gambling, misunderstanding or compromising? The Council of Europe and the war in Chechnya. Malfliet K, Parmentier S. eds. Russia and the Council of Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010:136–64.Google Scholar
  60. Monaghan A. Russian oil and EU energy security. Conflict Studies Research Centre at the Defence Academy of the United Kingdom; 2005.Google Scholar
  61. Nygren B. Putin’s use of natural gas to reintegrate the CIS region. Probl Post-Communism. 2008;55:3–15.Google Scholar
  62. Opinion Poll. Russian Popular Opinion on the Conflict with Gerogia 2004-2009. Levada Center. Russian Analytical Digest 2009;68:13–8.Google Scholar
  63. Orban A. Power, energy, and the new Russian imperialism. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Security International; 2008.Google Scholar
  64. Paarlberg R. The weak link between world food markets and world food security. Food Policy. 2000;25:317–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rogers H. Shale gas—the unfolding story. Oxford Rev Econ Policy. 2011;27(1):117–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Röller LH, Delgado J, Friederiszick HW Energy choices for Europe. Eur School of Man and Tech 2007.Google Scholar
  67. Rose R, Mishler W. How do electors respond to an “unfair” election? The experience of Russians. Post-Soviet Affairs. 2009;25(2):118–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ross M. Does oil hinder democracy? World Polit. 2001;53:325–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. “Russia demands $7 billion from Ukraine for gas.” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty’s Ukrainian Service. (January 28) 2013.Google Scholar
  70. Rutland P. Russia as an energy superpower. New Polit Econ. 2008;13:203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schmidt-Felzmann A. EU member states’ energy relations with Russia: conflicting approaches securing natural gas supplies. Geopolitics. 2011;16:574–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Smith B. The wrong kind of crisis: why oil booms and busts rarely lead to authoritarian breakdown. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2006;40:55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Smith Stegen K. Deconstructing the ‘energy weapon’: Russia’s threat to Europe as case study. Energy Policy. 2011;39:6505–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tirpak M. 2006. Energy supply in Central Europe and the Baltics. IMF Regional Office; 2006.Google Scholar
  75. von Hirschhausen C, Engerer H. Post-Soviet gas sector restructuring in the CIS: a political economy approach. Energy Policy. 1998;26(15):1113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wantchekon L. Why do resource dependent countries have authoritarian governments? J of Afr Finan Econ Dev. 2002;2:57–77.Google Scholar
  77. Winter N. Programs for STATA. Oprobpr Package; August 8, 2011.Google Scholar
  78. Wooldridge JM. Introductory econometrics. A modern approach. Thomson South-Western; 2006.Google Scholar
  79. Yorn SL. Oil, coalitions, and regime durability: the origins and persistence of popular rentierism in Kuwait. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2011;46:217–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations