Networks and Public Policies in the Global South: The Chilean Case and the Future of the Developmental Network State



Recently, there has been considerable excitement about the economic potential of the “developmental network state”—decentralized government policies that successfully accelerated growth in several high- and medium-income countries. The question remains whether such a strategy could be successful in less-developed nations whose scientific and technological resources were relatively limited. This paper analyzes the trajectory of Chile, a Southern country which, despite adverse conditions, managed to produce something akin to an economic miracle during the last few decades. Our argument is that Chile’s success was based on the developmental network state strategy. Moreover, we highlight the centrality to understanding the Chilean experience of the concept of “network failures”—a common phenomenon that occurs when domestic production would be best served by network forms of organization but for a variety of reasons, these networks either fail to materialize or fail to take hold (Schrank and Whitford 2011). Over and over again, we see that the logic behind the actions of the Chilean state was to provide resources that reduced the likelihood of network failures. We examine three case studies of successful export sectors: salmon; wine; and fruit and vegetables. The paper outlines some of the challenges faced by the Chilean model and assesses its long-term viability.


Developmental state Network forms of organization Industrial upgrading Technology transfer Innovation systems 


  1. Agosin M, Bravo-Ortega C. The emergence of new successful export activities in Latin America: the case of Chile. Research Network Working Paper #R-552. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Agosin M, Larraín C, Grau N. Industrial policy in Chile. Working Paper STD 294. Santiago: University of Chile; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. Arbix G, Martin SB. Beyond the developmental state, beyond neoliberalism: rethinking state capacities in the New Brazil. Paper at the colloquium: the Brazilian State: paths and prospects of dirigisme and liberalization, 9–10 November, New York; 2009.Google Scholar
  4. Barton JR. Environment, sustainability and regulation in commercial aquaculture: the case of Chilean Salmonid production. Geoforum. 1997;28:313–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benavente JM. Wine production in Chile. In: Chandra V, editor. Technology, adaptation, and exports—how some developing countries got it right. Washington: World Bank; 2006. p. 225–42.Google Scholar
  6. Benavente JM, Crespi G. The impact of an associative strategy (the PROFO Program) on Small and Medium Enterprises in Chile. SPRU Electronic Working Paper no. 88. Brighton: University of Sussex; 2003.Google Scholar
  7. Best MH. Cluster dynamics in Malaysian electronics. In: Jomo KS, editor. Malaysian industrial policy. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press; 2007. p. 249–76.Google Scholar
  8. Block F. Swimming against the current: the rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Polit Soc. 2008;36:169–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Block F, Keller MR. Where do innovations come from? Transformations in the US economy, 1970–2006. Soc Econ Rev. 2009;7:459–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Block F, Keller MR, editors. State of innovation: technology policy in the United States. Boulder: Paradigm; 2011.Google Scholar
  11. Breznitz D. Innovation and the state: political choice and strategies for growth in Israel, Taiwan, and Ireland. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  12. Breznitz D. Ideas, structure, state action and economic growth: rethinking the Irish miracle. Rev Int Polit Economy 2010, iFirst.Google Scholar
  13. Central Bank of Chile. Statistics Database. ( Accessed 16 November 2011
  14. Chollett DL. From sugar to blackberries restructuring agro-export production in Michoacán, Mexico. Lat Am Perspect. 2009;36:79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Mello L. Managing Chile’s macroeconomy during and after the copper price boom. OECD Economics Department Working Papers 605. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2008.Google Scholar
  16. Evans P. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  17. Fuentes JR. Managing natural resources revenue: the case of Chile. OxCarre Research paper 40. Oxford: Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies; 2009.Google Scholar
  18. Gallagher K, editor. Putting development first: the importance of policy space in the WTO and IFIs. London: Zed Books; 2005.Google Scholar
  19. Gerschenkron A. Economic backwardness in historical perspective: a book of essays. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1962.Google Scholar
  20. Goldberg M, Palladini E. Chile: a strategy to promote innovative small and medium enterprises. Policy Research Working Paper 4518. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gwynne RN. Governance and the wine commodity chain: upstream and downstream strategies in New Zealand and Chilean wine firms. Asia Pac View. 2006;47:381–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Havro G, Santiso J. Benefiting the resource rich: how can international development policy help tame the resource curse? Working Paper 355. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies; 2011.Google Scholar
  23. Heller P, Rueschemeyer D, Snyder R. Dependency and development in a globalized world: looking back and forward. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2009;44:287–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hernandez-Cuevas C, Valenzuela PDT. Strategies to capture biotechnology opportunities in Chile. Electron J Biotechn. 2004;7:191–207.Google Scholar
  25. Iikzuka M, Katz J. Natural resource industries, ‘Tragedy of the Commons’, and the case of Chilean salmon farming. Working Paper Series No. 61. Maastricht: United Nations University; 2010.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson C. MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy, 1929–1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1982.Google Scholar
  27. Katz J. Salmon Farming in Chile. In: Chandra V, editor. Technology, adaptation, and exports - how some developing countries got it right. Washington: World Bank; 2006. p. 193–224.Google Scholar
  28. Kharas H, Leipziger D, Maloney W, Thillainathan R, Hesse H. Chilean growth through East Asian eyes. Working Paper no. 31. Washington: Commission on Growth and Development; 2008.Google Scholar
  29. Kim, SY. Transitioning from Fast Follower to Innovator: The Institutional Foundations of the Korean Telecommunications Sector. Rev Int Pol Econ 2010, iFirst: 1–29Google Scholar
  30. Kohli A. States and economic development. Braz J Pol Econ. 2009;29:212–27.Google Scholar
  31. Kurtz MJ. State developmentalism without a developmental state: the public foundations of the “free market miracle” in Chile. Lat Am Polit Soc. 2001;43:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kurtz MJ. The social foundations of institutional order: reconsidering war and the ‘resource curse’ in third world state building. Polit Soc. 2009;37:479–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kurtz MJ, Brooks SM. Embedding neoliberal reform in Latin America. World Polit. 2008;60:231–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lall S. Reinventing industrial strategy: the role of government policy in building industrial competitiveness. G-24 Discussion Paper Series. New York and Geneva: United Nations; 2004.Google Scholar
  35. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin Sci Q. 1967;12:1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maman D, Rosenhek Z. The institutional dynamics of a developmental state: change and continuity in state-economy relations in Israel. Working Paper Series No. 5-2011. Raanana: The Open University of Israel, 2011.Google Scholar
  37. Mathews JA. Electronics in Taiwan—a case of technological learning. In: Chandra V, editor. Technology, adaptation, and exports - how some developing countries got it right. Washington: World Bank; 2006. p. 83–126.Google Scholar
  38. McDermott GA. The politics of institutional renovation and economic upgrading: recombining the vines that bind in Argentina. Polit Soc. 2007;35:103–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nayyar D. Learning to unlearn from development. Oxf Dev Stud. 2008;36:259–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nelson RC. Transnational strategic networks and policymaking in Chile: CORFO’s high technology investment promotion program. Lat Am Polit Soc. 2007;49:149–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ó Riain S. The politics of high-tech growth: developmental network states in the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ó Riain S. From developmental network state to market managerialism in Ireland. In: Block F, Keller MR, editors. State of innovation: technology policy in the United States. Boulder: Paradigm; 2011.Google Scholar
  43. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Demand-side Innovation Policies. OECD Publishing; 2011.Google Scholar
  44. Perez-Aleman P. Learning, adjustment and economic development: transforming firms, the state and associations in Chile. World Dev. 2000;28:41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perez-Aleman P. Cluster formation, institutions and learning: the emergence of clusters and development in Chile. Ind Corp Chang. 2005;14:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pfeffer J, Salancik G. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row; 1979.Google Scholar
  47. Podolny J, Page K. Network forms of organization. Annu Rev Sociol. 1998;24:57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Porter ME. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harv Bus Rev. 1998;76:77–90.Google Scholar
  49. Powell W. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res Organ Behav. 1990;12:295–336.Google Scholar
  50. Raynolds LT. The organic agro-export boom in Dominican Republic: maintaining tradition or fostering transformation? Lat Am Res Rev. 2008;43:161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rodrik D. Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Faculty Research Working Papers Series RWP04-047. Cambridge: Harvard University; 2004.Google Scholar
  52. Rodrik D. Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A review of the World Bank’s ‘Economic growth in the 1990s: learning from a decade of reform’. J Econ Lit. 2006;44:973–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Romani G, Atienza M, Amoros JE. Financing entrepreneurial activity in Chile: scale and scope of public support programs. Ventur Cap. 2009;11:55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rugraff E. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and supplier-oriented upgrading in the Czech motor vehicle industry. Reg Stud. 2009;44:627–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sabel CF. Bootstrapping development: rethinking the role of public intervention in promoting growth. New York: Columbia University; 2005.Google Scholar
  56. Saxenian A. Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  57. Schrank A, Kurtz MJ. Credit where credit is due: open economy industrial policy and export diversification in Latin America and the Caribbean. Polit Soc. 2005;33:671–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schrank A, Whitford J. The anatomy of network failure. Sociol Theory. 2011;29:151–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schurman RA. Chile’s new entrepreneurs and the ‘economic miracle’: the invisible hand or a hand from the state? Stud Comp Int Dev. 1996;31:83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Silva E. From dictatorship to democracy: the business-state Nexus in Chile’s economic transformation, 1975–1994. Comp Polit. 1996;28:299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith-Doerr L, Powell WW. Networks and economic life. In: Smelser N, Swedberg R, editors. The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2005. p. 379–402.Google Scholar
  62. Spencer JW, Gomez C. Can government policies promote entrepreneurship? Evidence from Costa Rica, Uruguay and Chile. Working Paper Series. Washington: George Washington University; 2001.Google Scholar
  63. Tan H. Evaluating SME support programs in Chile using panel firm data. Policy Research Working Paper 5082. Washington: World Bank; 2009.Google Scholar
  64. Viotti EB. National learning systems: a new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technol Forecast Soc. 2002;69:653–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wade RH. Governing the market: economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  66. Wade RH. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’. Rev Int Polit Econ. 2003;10:621–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weiss L. The transformative state: return, renewal, or rediscovery? Paper presented at Conference on New economic Thinking, Teaching and Policy Perspective: A Brazilian Perspective within a Global Dialogue. Rio de Janeiro, November 2011.Google Scholar
  68. Whitford J, Schrank A. The paradox of the weak state revisited: industrial policy, network governance, and political decentralization. In: Block F, Keller MR, editors. State of innovation: technology policy in the United States. Boulder: Paradigm; 2011.Google Scholar
  69. Williamson J. What Washington means by policy reform. In: Williamson J, editor. Latin American adjustment: how much has happened? Washington: Institute for International Economics; 1990.Google Scholar
  70. World Bank. World Development Indicators Database. ( Accessed 13 June 2011

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OaklandUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of California-DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations