Partisan Activism and Access to Welfare in Lebanon

Article

Abstract

How do welfare regimes function when state institutions are weak and ethnic or sectarian groups control access to basic services? This paper explores how people gain access to basic services in Lebanon, where sectarian political parties from all major religious communities are key providers of social assistance and services. Based on analyses of an original national survey (n = 1,911) as well as in-depth interviews with providers and other elites (n = 175) and beneficiaries of social programs (n = 135), I make two main empirical claims in the paper. First, political activism and a demonstrated commitment to a party are associated with access to social assistance; and second, higher levels of political activism may facilitate access to higher levels or quantities of aid, including food baskets and financial assistance for medical and educational costs. These arguments highlight how politics can mediate access to social assistance in direct ways and add new dimensions to scholarly debates about clientelism by focusing on contexts with politicized religious identities and by problematizing the actual goods and services exchanged.

Keywords

Social welfare Non-state welfare Political behavior Sectarianism Lebanon 

References

  1. Alesina A, Baqir R, Easterly W. Public goods and ethnic divisions. Q J Econ. 1999;114(4):1243–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ammar W. Health system and reform in Lebanon. WHO Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office: Beirut; 2003.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson B. Imagined communities. London: Verso; 1991.Google Scholar
  4. Auyero J. Poor people’s politics: Peronist survival networks & the legacy of Evita. Duke University Press: Durham, NC; 2001.Google Scholar
  5. Brinckerhoff D. Exploring state–civil society collaboration. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 1999;28:59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown LD. Creating social capital: nongovernment development organizations and intersectoral problem solving. In: Powell WW, Clemens ES, editors. Private action and public goods. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1998. p. 228–44.Google Scholar
  7. Calvo E, Murillo MV. Who delivers? Partisan clients in the Argentine electoral market. Am J Poli Sci. 2004;48(4):742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cammett M. Everyday sectarianism: welfare and politics in plural societies. Unpublished manuscript. Brown University: Department of Political Science 2010.Google Scholar
  9. Central Intelligence Agency. Lebanon. CIA World Factbook; 2008.Google Scholar
  10. Corm G. Liban: Hégémonie Milicienne Et Problème De Rétablissement De L'etat. Maghreb Machrek. 1991;131:13–25.Google Scholar
  11. Corstange D. Diversity and development or fragmentation and failure? Government institutions and development in multiethnic societies. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Pol Sci, University of Michigan; 2007.Google Scholar
  12. Costa D, Kahn M. Civic engagement and community heterogeneity, an economist’s perspective. Perspectives on politics. 2003;1(1):103–11.Google Scholar
  13. Diaz-Cayeros A, Estevez F, Magaloni B. Strategies of vote-buying: poverty, democracy, and social transfers in Mexico. In: Dept of Pol Sci, Stanford University. Stanford, CA; 2007.Google Scholar
  14. Dixit A, Londregan J. The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics. J Polit. 1996;58(4):1132–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doumato EA, Starrett G, editors. Teaching Islam: textbooks and religion in the Middle East. Boulder: Lynne Rienner; 2006.Google Scholar
  16. Easterly W, Levine R. Africa's growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. Q J Econ. 1997;112:1203–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EU. Parliamentary elections in Lebanon. Election Observation Mission. Beirut, Lebanon; 2005.Google Scholar
  18. Fawaz LT. An occasion for war: Mount Lebanon and Damascus in 1860. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  19. Freedman SW, Corkalo D, Levy N, Abazovic D, Leebaw B, Ajdukovic D, et al. Public education and social reconstruction in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. In: Stover E, Weinstein HM, editors. My neighbor, my enemy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  20. Gates CL. The merchant Republic of Lebanon: rise of an open economy. London: I.B. Tauris; 1998.Google Scholar
  21. Habyarimana J, Humphreys M, Posner D, Weintein J. Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision. Am Poli Sci Rev. 2007;101(4):709–25.Google Scholar
  22. Haggard S, Kaufman RR. Development, democracy, and welfare states: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Hamzeh AN. In the path of Hizbullah. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  24. Hanf T. Coexistence in Wartime Lebanon: decline of a state and rise of a nation. London: London Centre for Lebanese Studies in association with I.B. Tauris & Co.; 1993.Google Scholar
  25. Hanssen J. Fin De Siecle Beirut: the making of an Ottoman provincial capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  26. Harik JP. The public and social services of the Lebanese militias. Oxford: Center for Lebanese Studies, Oxford University; 1994. p. 1–54.Google Scholar
  27. International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES). The Lebanese Electoral System. IFES Lebanon Briefing Paper; March 2009.Google Scholar
  28. Kaplan S. The pedagogical state: education and the politics of national culture in post-1980 Turkey. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  29. Mainwaring S. Introduction: democratic accountability in Latin America. In: Mainwaring S, Welna C, editors. Democratic accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 1–33.Google Scholar
  30. Makdisi U. The culture of sectarianism: community, history, and violence in nineteenth century Ottoman Lebanon. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  31. MacLean LM. Informal institutions and citizenship in Rural Africa: risk and reciprocity in Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire. Cambridge: New York; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nichter S. Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. Am Poli Sci Rev. 2008;102(1):19–31.Google Scholar
  33. Podeh E. History and memory in the Israeli educational system: the portrayal of the Arab–Israeli conflict in history textbooks (1948–2000). Hist Mem. 2000;12:1.Google Scholar
  34. Posner D. Measuring ethnic fractionalization in Africa. Am Poli Sci Rev. 2004;48(4):849–863.Google Scholar
  35. Republic of Lebanon/UNDP. Map of living conditions in Lebanon, 1996. Ministry of Social Affairs and UNDP: Beirut; 1998.Google Scholar
  36. Republic of Lebanon/UNDP. Map of living conditions in Lebanon, 2004. Ministry of Social Affairs and UNDP: Beirut; 2006.Google Scholar
  37. Salamon LM. Partners in public service: government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  38. Stokes SC. Perverse accountability: a formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. Am Poli Sci Rev. 2005;99(3):315–25.Google Scholar
  39. Stokes SC. Political clientelism. In: Boix C, Stokes SC, editors. Oxford handbook of comparative politics. Oxford: Oxford University; 2007. p. 604–27.Google Scholar
  40. Tabbarah R. The health sector in Lebanon. 2000. MADMA: Beirut.Google Scholar
  41. Traboulsi F. A history of modern Lebanon. London: Pluto; 2007.Google Scholar
  42. US Dept. of State. Lebanon: international religious freedom in the world 2008. Available at http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108487.htm. Accessed 3 Jan 2011.
  43. Weitz-Shapiro R. Partisanship and protest: the politics of workfare distribution in Argentina. Latin Am Res Rev. 2006;41(3):122–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Widner J. Political reform in Anglophone and Francophone African Countries. In: Widner J, editor. Economic change and political liberalization in Sub-Saharan Africa. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1994. p. 49–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations