Skip to main content

Technology Acquisition and Innovation in the Developing World: Wind Turbine Development in China and India

Studies in Comparative International Development volume 42, pages 208–232 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Although China and India rely on coal to fuel most of their electricity generation, both countries are also home to burgeoning wind power industries. India currently leads the developing world in manufacturing utility-scale wind turbines, and China is close behind. This study examines the technology development strategies that have been pursued by the companies Suzlon and Goldwind, India and China’s leading wind turbine manufacturers. While the institutional and other barriers present in large, developing countries such as China and India certainly challenge any simplistic notions of energy leapfrogging, an examination of wind turbine development in these countries has shown that substantial technical advances are possible in a relatively short time. While both Suzlon and Goldwind pursued similar licensing arrangements to acquire basic technical knowledge, Goldwind’s technology development model lacks Suzlon’s network of strategically positioned global subsidiaries that contribute to its base of industry knowledge and technical capacity. This examination of how two leading developing-country firms have acquired and assimilated advanced technologies provides crucial insights into facilitating international technology transfers, which will be an important component of any technological leapfrogging strategy to achieve lower greenhouse gas emissions in the developing world.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. Although less common, there is a growing recognition of the potential of “south-south” technology transfer (technology transfer between developing countries.)

  2. In this situation, IPR concerns are less substantial, and foreign companies can continue to sell their technology without risk of local competition. However, the major barrier to technology transfer in such situations is likely to be the technology cost.

  3. Both countries have vast wind resource potential; China has an estimated 1,000,000 MW of total exploitable wind resources, including about 250,000 MW on land and 750,000 MW offshore, although the amount that is technically and economically viable may closer to 300,000 MW overall (SDPC 2000). Estimates of India’s wind resources are less readily available; one estimate puts the range from 20,000 to 45,000 MW (WEC 2001) though this range is likely quite conservative.

  4. Local content is generally calculated according to cost, therefore 70% local content represents domestically produced components totaling 70% of the wind turbine cost.

  5. Models include 350 kW, 950 kW, 1 MW, 1.25 MW, and 2.1 MW turbines.

  6. 10,000 DM was the amount specified in the arrangement; the conversion to Euros is an estimate.

  7. In 1995, U.S. Windpower sued Germany’s Enercon for patent infringement and won, preventing Enercon—a major competitor—from selling its variable speed technology in the U.S. (WPM, May 2003:30). Since purchasing Enron in 2002, GE has filed similar patent infringement suits in Europe and Canada, and recently in China (WPM, May 2003:29).

  8. Despite some indications that the Chinese government would implement a nation-wide feed-in tariff program, it instead based the pricing structure for wind power on a competitive bidding model in the 2006 pricing regulations of the renewable energy law (WPM, February 2006:25). Certain provinces (namely Guangdong) and projects have continued to utilize fixed feed-in tariffs.

  9. An example of this fear has been realized by Vestas, the Danish company that licensed its wind turbine technology to Gamesa, a Spanish company (initially for use only in Spain) and now views them as a major competitor in the global market.

References

  • Amsden A. The rise of the rest: challenges to the west from late-industrializing economies. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi D, Michie J. The globalization of technology: a new taxonomy. Camb J Econ 1995;19:121–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks H. What we know and do not know about technology transfer. From National Research Council Technology and Development Steering Committee (ed). Marshalling technology for development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995.

  • Brown C-A. Commercialising wind power in China: the policy challenge.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Geography and the Environment and the Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford; 2002.

  • BTM Consult ApS. International wind energy development, World Market Update 2006, March; 2007.

  • Composites-Asia. LM Glasfiber gains major wind turbine blade contract in China. (in Chinese). February 15. Available at: http://www.composites-asia.com/marketnewsshow.asp?id = 48 2007.

  • Freeman C. The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective. Camb J Econ 1995;19 1, February.

  • Frondel M, Horbach J, Rennings K. What triggers environmental management and innovation? Empirical evidence for Germany. RWI Discussion Paper No. 15, RWI Essen. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=556945 2004.

  • Gallagher KS. Limits to leapfrogging in energy technologies? Evidence from the Chinese automobile industry. Energy Policy 2006;34(4):383–94. March.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George AL. Case studies and theory development: the method of structured, focused comparison. In: Lauren PG, editor. Diplomacy: new approaches to history, theory and policy. New York: The Free Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gipe P. Wind energy comes of age. New York: Wiley; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldemberg J. Leapfrog energy technologies. Energy Policy 1998;26(10):729–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet D. The uncertain promise: value conflicts in technology transfer. New York: New Horizons; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin TF. Transferring environmental technologies to China recent developments and constraints. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2001;67:55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman AO. Development projects observed. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hua J. China’s Goldwind blows off U.S. IPO, stays at home. Jun 11, 2007. Available at: http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idUKHKG15266620070611?pageNumber=3 2007.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Methodological and technological issues in technology transfer. In: Metz B, Ogunlade R, Davidson JWM, van Rooijen SNM, van Wie McGrory L, editors. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A, Jacobsson S. The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries. In: Metcalfe JS, Cantner U, editors. Change, transformation and development. Springer Press; 2003.

  • Kamp L, Smits R, Andriesse C. Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in The Netherlands and Denmark. Energy Policy 2004;32:1625–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnoe P. Technological innovation and industrial organization in the Danish wind industry. Entrep Reg Dev 1990;2:105–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria V. Technology transfer for GHG reduction: a framework with application to India. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2002;69:405–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinge P. International technology transfer system and technology transfer to India. LLM Thesis, Munich Intellectual Property Law Center; 2005.

  • Kranzberg M. The technical elements in international technology transfer: historical perspectives. In: McIntyre JR, Papp DS, editors. The political economy of international technology transfer. Westport: Greenwood; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Jain PK. Commercialization of new technologies in India: an empirical study of perceptions of technology institutions. Technovation 2003;23:113–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeeMaster T. Wind turbine maker plans US$200 m overseas listing. The Standard, online version (April19); 2006.

  • Lewis JI, Wiser RH. Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: an international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms. Energy Policy 2007;35(3):1844–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung A. China’s goldwind wants US share float. June 20, 2006. Available at: http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2006/06/20/china_wind_power_plant_maker_wants_us_ipo/> 2006.

  • Liu X, White S. Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context. Res Policy 2001;30:1091–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W-Q, Lin G, Zhang X-L. Cost-competitive incentives for wind energy development in China: institutional dynamics and policy changes. Energy Policy 2002;30:753–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall B-A. National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovations and interactive learning. London: Pinter; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E. Intellectual property protection, foreign direct investment, and technology transfer. International Finance Corporation, Discussion Paper 19; 1994.

  • Marcusen JR, Venables AJ. Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development. Eur Econ Rev 1999;43.

  • Metcalfe S. The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In: Stoneman P, editor. Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (US): Blackwell; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miesing P, Kriger M, Slough N. Towards a model of effective knowledge transfer within transnationals: the case of Chinese foreign invested enterprises. Draft paper for the J Technol Trans. Available at: http://www.albany.edu/~pm157/research/JTT.pdf 2003.

  • Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), State Development Planning Commission (SDPC), State Economic and Trade Commission. Evaluation of policies designed to promote the commercialization of wind power technology in China. Energy Foundation China Sustainable Energy Program. May 15. Available at: http://www.efchina.org/documents/WindPowerTech-complete.pdf> 2002.

  • Mitchell C, Bauknecht D, Connor P. Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany. Energy Policy 2006;34:297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC, Oxley JE. Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems. Camb J Econ 1995;19:67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson MW. Intellectual property rights, internalization and technology transfer. US Federal Trade Commission. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/be/workpapers/wp250.pdf> 2000.

  • Norberg-Bohm V. Stimulating ‘green’ technological innovation: an analysis of alternative policy mechanisms. Policy Sci 1999;32:13–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odell JS. Case study methods in international political economy. Int Stud Perspect 2001;2:161–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel P. Localized production of technology for global markets. Camb J Econ 1995;19:141–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins R. Environmental leapfrogging in developing countries: a critical assessment and reconstruction. Natural Resources Forum. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME. America’s green strategy. Sci Am 1991;264:168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajsekhar B, Van Hulle F, Jansen J. Indian wind energy programme: performance and future directions. Energy Policy 1999;27:669–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Red Herring. Prospectus: Suzlon energy limited. September 12, 2005 Available at: http://www.sebi.gov.in/dp/suz.pdf> 2005.

  • Reddy MN, Zhao LM. International technology transfer: a review. Res Policy 1990;19(4):285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N, Frischtak C. International technology transfer: concepts, measures, and comparisons. Praeger: New York; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori G. Comparing and miscomparing. J Theor Polit 1991;3(3):243–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian A. Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijm J. The performance of feed-in Tariffs to promote renewable electricity in European countries. The Energy Centre of The Netherlands, ECN-C-02-083, November; 2002.

  • Soares PF. Suzlon Energy Ltd – China. Presentation to the 4th Annual China Investment Forum, New York, May 31–Jun 01, 2007; 2007a.

  • Soares PF. Chief Representative Officer, Suzlon Energy Ltd, Beijing Representative Office. Conversation at Suzlon’s offices in Beijing, July 12, 2007; 2007b.

  • State Development Planning Commission (SDPC). China new & renewable energy: 1999 white book. Beijing: China Planning Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg PF. Environmental leadership in developing countries: transnational relations and biodiversity policy in Costa Rica and Bolivia. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzlon.com, 2007. Official company website. Accessed June 2007.

  • UNDP Human Development Report. Available at: www.hdr.undp.org/hdr2006> 2006.

  • US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (US OTA). Technology transfer to China. OTA-ISC-340 Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, July; 1987.

  • Van de Vegte H. Environmental leapfrogging in China’s energy sector: a critical assessment of the clean development mechanism and the introduction to a new leapfrogging instrument. Master’s Thesis. Wageningen University and Research Centre and Technical University, Eindhoven, Netherlands. March; 2005.

  • Van Est R. Winds of change: a comparative study of the politics of wind energy innovation in California and Denmark. Utrecht: International Books; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishwasrao S, Busshardt W. Foreign ownership and technology adoption: evidence from Indian firms. J Dev Econ 2001;65:367–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Energy Council (WEC). Survey of energy resources. Chapter 13: Wind energy. Available at: http://www.worldenergy.org/wec-geis/publications/reports/ser/wind/wind.asp> 2001.

  • Wind Concession Synthesis and Policy Research Discussion Group (Fengdian Texu Quanzong he Zhengce Yanjiu Keti Zhu). Wind Concession Policy Framework and Utilization Methodology Research (Fengdian Texuquan Zhengce Kuangjia he Yunzuo Fangshi Yanjiu). (In Chinese). July; 2003.

  • Windpower Monthly (WPM). European interim ruling on patent validity—GE Wind sues Enercon and its agents in Britain and Canada. Denmark: Windpower Monthly News Magazine A/S; May 2003:29.

  • Windpower Monthly (WPM). Patent history with bizarre interludes. Denmark: Windpower Monthly News Magazine A/S; May 2003:30.

  • Windpower Monthly (WPM). New law drives return to market growth—India on fast forward. Denmark: Windpower Monthly News Magazine A/S; March 2004:57.

  • Windpower Monthly (WPM). Denmark picked for global headquarters. Torgny Moller and Gail Rajgor. Denmark: Windpower Monthly News Magazine A/S; October 2004:25.

  • Windpower Monthly (WPM). China changes tack and goes for tender system—premium fixed tariff definitively dropped by government. Denmark: Windpower Monthly News Magazine A/S; February, 2006:25.

  • Windpower Monthly (WPM). New national policy and grid investment—India close to 2012 wind target. Denmark: Windpower Monthly News Magazine A/S; March, 2006:44.

  • Windpower Monthly (WPM). Chinese wind turbine suppliers sweep the board—foreign companies miss out on 1000 MW of contracts; November, 2006:27.

  • Windpower Monthly (WPM). Global wind market status 2007 (special issue). Denmark: Windpower Monthly News Magazine A/S; March, 2007:37–84.

  • Wiser R, Bolinger M. Annual Report on US wind power installation, cost and performance trends: 2006. U.S. Department of Energy; 2007.

  • Yu WM, Wu G. The development of China’s wind turbine manufacturing industry and the strategy of Goldwind Co. Proceedings of the World Wind Energy Congress, Beijing, China, October 31–November 4; 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA, USA

    Joanna I. Lewis

Authors
  1. Joanna I. Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna I. Lewis.

Additional information

This research was supported in part by the Energy Foundation China Sustainable Energy Program and the Center for Resource Solutions. The author would like to thank all who commented on and contributed to earlier versions of this manuscript, including Ryan Wiser, Dan Kammen, Wang Yang, Simone Pulver, and three anonymous reviewers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, J.I. Technology Acquisition and Innovation in the Developing World: Wind Turbine Development in China and India. St Comp Int Dev 42, 208–232 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-007-9012-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-007-9012-6

Keywords

  • Energy leapfrogging
  • Technology transfer
  • Wind power industry