Suggested Further Reading
Margo J. Anderson. The American Census: A Social History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.
Michael L. Balinski and H. Peyton Young. “The Quota Method of Apportionment”. American Mathematics Monthly 82 (1975): 701–30.
Michael L. Balinski and H. Peyton Young. Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.
Sam T. Davis. “Reapportionment: Numerical Politics.” American Demographics (November 1981): 24–29.
Jonathan L. Entin. “Legal Considerations in Census Planning.” In International Union for the Scientific Study of Population. International Population Conference, Montreal 1993, pp. 157–65. Liege, Belgium: IUSSP, 1993.
Christine L. Himes and Clifford C. Clogg. “An Overview of Demographic Analysis as a Method for Evaluating Census Converage in the United States.” Population Index 58 (Winter 1992): 587–607.
Edward V. Huntington. “A New Method of Apportionment of Representatives”. Quarterly Publication of the American Statistical Association 17 (1920): 859–70.
Jeffrey S. Passel. “What Census Adjustment Would Mean.” Population Today (June 1991): 6–8.
Laurence F. Schmeckebier. Congressional Apportionment. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1941.
Walter F. Willcox. “The Apportionment of Representatives.” American Economic Review, Supplement 6 (1916): 1–16.
Walter F. Willcox. “Last Words on the Apportionment Problem.” Law and Contemporary Problems 17 (1952): 290–302.
Additional information
Dudley L. Poston is head of the Department of Sociology and Samuel Rhea Gammon Professor of Liberal Arts at Texas A & M University. He is widely published in professional journals on sociological and demographic subjects.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poston, D.L. The U.S. census and congressional apportionment. Soc 34, 36–44 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-997-1005-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-997-1005-6