Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The “Only Hope”: China’s One-Child Generation in the Context of Modernization

  • SPECIAL ISSUE: HOPE IN DIFFICULT TIMES
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

China was the first country in the world to explicitly implement a one-child policy by means of its National Administrative Directive. Nourished by Confucianism, Chinese people attach great importance to the continuation of the bloodline and consider “many children and many blessings” as a symbol of a happy family. Due to the rapid modernization of Chinese society after the period of reform and “opening up,” the one-child generation has figured as a central feature of this social acceleration. Children are also commonly characterized as the “only hope” of their parents for continuation of their families. In this article, we use the generation of “only children” in China (born in 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s), as a case study to explore the hopes and emotions of Chinese families in the context of modernization. We focus on the following aspects by comparing theories related to hope, especially Fei Xiaotong’s family theory and Bloch’s theory of concrete utopia: (a) the change in the paradigm of family-centered hope from traditional China to the modern society; (b) the context of modernization in which the Chinese one-child generation grows up and becomes the hope for the future of the Chinese family and society; and (c) the new challenges encountered by the one-child generation, and by the hopes of the family and society, in terms of the continuity of cultural inheritance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Cited from the website of the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China: http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A01/s4561/s4564/s6884/s6885/201210/t20121026_143700.html

References

  • Arendt, H. 1978. The life of the mind. Vol. 2. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbalet, J. 2021. The analysis of Chinese rural society: Fei Xiaotong revisited. Modern China, 47(4), 355-382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. 2013. Liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. 1981. Family size and the quality of children. Demography, 18, 421-442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. 1989. Family size and achievement. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, E. 1986. The principle of hope. The MIT Press. (Original work published 1959).

  • Chen, Y. H. 2010. A Study on the Risks of the One-Child Policy. Population and Development, (4): 19-32. (Chinese).

  • Cheng, B. Q. 2018. Self and Enlightenment: The Modern Transformation of Confucianism. Xuehai, (5), 44-50. (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B. Q. 2021. Self, mediation and society: the Internet as an emotional machine. Fujian Forum (Humanities and Social Sciences), (10), 187-201. (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. 2017. A sensory sociology of the future: Affect, hope and inventive methodologies. The Sociological Review, 65, 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, J., Zheng, X. E. 2010. An overview of research on first-generation urban one-child families and their old-age problems. Population and Development, (5): 95-102. (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 2005. Suicide: A study in sociology. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T. 1984. The single-child family. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fei, X. T. 1992. From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fei, X. T. 1999. Fertility System. The Commercial Press. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fei, X. T. 2004. Reflections on the historical and social nature of culture. Thought Front, 30(2), 1-6. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, X. T. 2020a. The one-child problem in the “post one-child era”. Zhejiang Journal, 05, 64-73. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, X. T. 2020b. An era and the life course of two generations:40 years of one-child studies in China (1980-2019). Journal of Humanities (11), 22-36. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, V. L. 2004. Only hope: Coming of age under China’s one-child policy. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. 2010. The revolution of hope: Toward a humanized technology. American Mental Health Foundation. (1st ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1968).

  • Habermas, J. 1985. The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Beacon press.

  • Hagewen, K. J., & Morgan, S. P. 2005. Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Population and development review, 31(3), 507-527.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, K., & Wang, M. 2009. The one-child group and education reform: A study on the situation of one-child children in China. Primary and Secondary Education, (6), 63-72. (Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 2010. An attempt at a “compositionist manifesto”. New literary history, 41(3), 471-490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, S. M. 1987. Essentials of Chinese Culture. Xue Lin Publishing House. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Linyan, L. I., & Boqing, C. 2023. Hope and Paradox in Contemporary Chinese Society: A Moment for Cultural Transformation?. The American Sociologist, 54(1), 101-122.

  • Liu, Q. 2022. The “sibling gap” and family change in the post-single-child era. Youth Exploration (06), 52-61. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffesoli, M. 1995. The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. The Time of the Tribes, 1–192.

  • Marx, K. 2016. Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. In Social Theory Re-Wired (pp. 152-158). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, P. 2002. Emotion and Reason. China Social Science Press. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki. (Eds.) n.d. The economy of hope (pp. 37–50). University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Negroponte, N., Harrington, R., McKay, S. R., & Christian, W. 1997. Being digital. Computers in Physics, 11(3), 261-262.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Qian M. 1979. Confucius and the Analects of Confucius. Lianjing Publishing House. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian X. Z. 1989. Education of the only child. Chinese Journal of Mental Health, 3(3), 97-99. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. 2017. Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne, Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H. (Ed.). 2010. High-speed society: Social acceleration, power, and modernity. Penn State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribano, A. 2022a. Founding Women, Sociology, and Hope. The American Sociologist, 54(1), 36-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scribano, A. 2022b. Emotions in a Digital World: Social Research 4.0. Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. 2005. Men, sport, spinal cord injury, and narratives of hope. Social Science & Medicine, 61(5), 1095-1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, K., & Spitze, G. 2011. Growing up without siblings and adult sociability behaviors. Journal of Family Issues, 32(9), 1178-1204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vangelisti, A. L., & Perlman, D. (Eds.). 2018. The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1905. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Scribners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, B. 2010. The theory of “state” for ordinary people. Open Times, 10, 117-132. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Y. 2020. “Family” as a method: An attempt of Chinese social theory. Chinese Social Sciences (11), 172-191. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. L. 2019. Traditional Chinese culture with “family” as a paradigm. Journal of Jiangsu Administrative College, (5), 24-30. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. T., & Jia C. 2022. Space, Communities and Networks: Emotional Governance Practices in Shanghai under Public Crisis. Sociétés, 158(4), 81-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., & Zhou, J. P. 2009. A study of one-child risk and its protection. Social Science Research, (1), 90-95. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This article is supported by the Chinese Fund for the Humanities and Social Science, project number 21WXWB002, and the Chenguang Program of Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China

    Zhang Jingting

  2. Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

    Jia Chao

Authors
  1. Zhang Jingting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jia Chao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia Chao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jingting, Z., Chao, J. The “Only Hope”: China’s One-Child Generation in the Context of Modernization. Soc 61, 9–17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00928-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00928-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation