Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fragmented Discourses: The Indian Digital Public Sphere in a Post-truth Era

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper explores the fragmented discourses in the Indian digital public sphere in a post-truth world. The normative concept of the public sphere by Jürgen Habermas has been brought under critical scrutiny in the era of emotional communication online. The digital world opened democratic and inclusive spaces that are desirable for a picture-perfect public sphere as imagined by Habermas. The low entry barriers and inclusivity of the digital public sphere changed the patterns of political communication worldwide. However, such a change is not an isolated event and must be located within the historical context of a changing political environment. Contemporary society has entered the post-truth era where opinionated, emotional outbursts downplay objective reality. The paper explores explicitly the public comments recorded under an infotainment video on the YouTube platform of a private channel in Kerala, the southernmost state of India. A case study method was adopted to analyze the theme, subtext, and visible structure of the discourse in the digital public sphere, which is a subset of the larger public sphere. Disconcertingly, the findings revealed fragmented discourses in a public sphere, characterized by unidimensional historical narratives, fallacious arguments, political apathy, and emotional or romanticized appeals, all of which are classic symptoms of a post-truth era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availability

The data set used for the study is registered comments under the YouTube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJefDxlRthM).

References

  • Adorno, T. W., & Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1969). The Authoritarian Personality. Norton. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=HYq2wwEACAAJ

  • Ali, A. (2001). Evolution of the public sphere in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 2419–2425.

  • Anderson, P. (2013). The Indian Ideology. Verso Books. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=OD9gDwAAQBAJ

  • Arendt, H. (1967). Truth and politics. Truth: Engagements across Philosophical Traditions, 295.

  • BBC. (2022, October 13). Kerala’s TJ Joseph: The Indian teacher whose hand was cut off for an exam paper.

  • Bernholz, L., Cordelli, C., & Reich, R. (2013). The Emergence of Digital Civil Society. In Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society (Issue September).

  • Bilgin, P. (2017). Resisting post‐truth politics, a primer: Or, how not to think about human mobility and the global environment. Global Policy, 8, 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (2008). The transformation of the public sphere: Political authority, communicative freedom, and internet publics. In Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498725.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A., & Highfield, T. (2015). Is Habermas on twitter? Social media and the public sphere. In The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butter, M., & Knight, P. (2020). Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=8DjSDwAAQBAJ

  • Calhoun, C., Gerteis, J., Moody, J., Pfaff, S., & Virk, I. (2022). Contemporary Sociological Theory. Wiley. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=A8Z6EAAAQBAJ

  • Castells, M. (2009). The Rise of the Network Society, with a New Preface: The Information Age - Economy, Society and Culture. In Information Age Ser.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New Media and Society, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089414

  • D’Ancona, M. (2017). Post Truth: The New War on Truth and how to Fight Back. Ebury Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Z7ZWMQAACAAJ

  • Dahlberg, L. (2007). Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: from consensus to contestation. New Media & Society, 9(5), 827–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2002). Publicity’s Secret: How Technoculture Capitalizes on Democracy. Cornell University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=vPPAAYt4xlgC

  • Dey, S. (2020). Let There Be Clamor: Exploring the Emergence of a New Public Sphere in India and Use of Social Media as an Instrument of Activism. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859919827319

  • Diamond, J. M. (1998). Guns, Germs and Steel: A Short History of Everybody for the Last 13,000 Years. Vintage. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=OwVrSMQPPowC

  • Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261

  • Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media and Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002003

  • Guha, R. (2017). India After Gandhi: The History of the World’s Largest Democracy. Pan Macmillan. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=AW4sDwAAQBAJ

  • Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (First). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere. Theory, Culture and Society, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341

  • Habermas, J., Lennox, S., & Lennox, F. (1974). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). New German Critique, 3, 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. Penguin Books Limited. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=y9-GG5gPzgwC

  • Haksar, N., & Vaishnav, K. (2022). The BJP’s use of online Authoritarian populism to advance an Ethnoreligious Nationalist agenda in the 2019 General Election poses a threat to Indian Democracy. Al-Qantara, 8(3).

  • Harambam, J., Grusauskaite, K., & de Wildt, L. (2022). Poly-truth, or the limits of pluralism: Popular debates on conspiracy theories in a post-truth era. Public Understanding of Science, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221092145

  • Harsin, J. (2017). Trump l’Œil: Is Trump’s Post-Truth Communication Translatable? Contemporary French and Francophone Studies, 21(5), 512–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heble, A. (2002). Re-ethicizing the classroom: Pedagogy, the public sphere, and the postcolonial condition. College Literature, 29(1).

  • Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2011). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=18IWX4hxHNUC

  • Lawless, B., & Chen, Y.-W. (2019). Developing a method of critical thematic analysis for qualitative communication inquiry. Howard Journal of Communications, 30(1), 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S. (2017). Post-truth politics and the social sciences. Environmental Sociology, 3(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, D. (2021). Post-Truth Society? An Eliasian Sociological Analysis of Knowledge in the 21st Century. Sociology, 55(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038521994039

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=sdbtAAAAMAAJ

  • Negt, O., Kluge, A., & Labanyi, P. (1988). “ The Public Sphere and Experience”: Selections. October, 46, 60–82.

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=mX_woAEACAAJ

  • Rajagopal, A. (2001). Politics After Television: Hindu Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Public in India. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=PbgW2jTESKEC

  • Rao, M. (2011). Love Jihad and demographic fears. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 18(3), 425–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringel, S., & Davidson, R. (2022). Proactive ephemerality: How journalists use automated and manual tweet deletion to minimize risk and its consequences for social media as a public archive. New Media and Society, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820972389

  • Schudson, M. (1999). The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=aawMAQAAMAAJ

  • Seeliger, M., & Villa Braslavsky, P. I. (2022). Reflections on the Contemporary Public Sphere: An Interview with Judith Butler. Theory, Culture and Society, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764211066260

  • Sircar, N. (2020). The politics of vishwas: Political mobilization in the 2019 national election. Contemporary South Asia, 28(2), 178–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher, 7(2), 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudarmanto, B., & Meliala, A. (2020). Harmful Discourse on Social Media: The Triggering Factors of Persecution Acts in Post-Truth Era. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 14(1).

  • Tandoc Jr, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news” A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, A. K. (2020). New media and the Dalit counter-public sphere. Television & New Media, 21(4), 360–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. (2013). Contemporary Sociological Theory. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=GGZaDwAAQBAJ

  • Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2014). Public/Private. In Critical Terms for the Study of the gender (358–392). University of Chicago Press

  • Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 313–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Social Exclusion and Inclusive Policy, School of Social Science, University of Hyderabad, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India

    Shabin Basheer

  2. Department of Social Work, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India

    Chitra Karunakaran Prasanna

  3. Department of Social Work, Don Bosco College, University of Kerala, Kottiyam, Kollam, Kerala, India

    Fathimath Mahitha. K.

Authors
  1. Shabin Basheer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chitra Karunakaran Prasanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fathimath Mahitha. K.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: S.B.N. and C.K.P. Methodology: S.B.N., F.M.K., and C.K.P. Data analysis: S.B.N. and F.M.K. Writing—original draft preparation: S.B.N. Writing—review and editing: C.K.P. and S.B.N. All authors have agreed to the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shabin Basheer.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basheer, S., Prasanna, C.K. & Mahitha. K., F. Fragmented Discourses: The Indian Digital Public Sphere in a Post-truth Era. Soc 60, 907–921 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00877-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00877-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation