Skip to main content
Log in

Chiasmatic Crossings Between Freud’s Clinical Projects and Social Concerns

  • Review Symposium: Howard Kaye’s Freud as a Social and Cultural Theorist
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The culturally informed metapsychology of Freud’s is horizonal (sic) with psychoanalytically informed accounts of social concerns but not interchangeable. There are limits, to be sure, but evocative and informed chiasmatic crossings between them are generative and serve both fields of psychoanalysis and social thought. Psychoanalysis gives us access to the tragic inner life of humans and their capacity to love and betray, create and kill, among other acts of humans. The psychologically-charged world of social concerns is but an external field of reference that resonates with internal world representations. Inside and outside fold into each other to create a spiral circularity of events and psychological configurations that can be resubjectivized in accounts of human nature and the civilizing process in both psychoanalytic work and practices of social theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Agamben, G. 2009. The Signature of all Things: on Method. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apprey, M. 1987. The Unraveling of Incest in a Transgenerational Context. Part 1—“I hate Light Blacks: They are Sneaky”: A Pregnant Adolescents Protest at Father’s Anonymity. In H. F. Stein & M. Apprey (Eds.), From Metaphor to Meaning: Papers in Psychoanalytic Anthropology (pp. 55 –74). Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. 1988. Le pli - Leibniz et le baroque. Trans. The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. London: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1900. The Interpretation of Dreams, S.E. 4.

  • Freud, S. 1912. Totem and Taboo. S.E., 13, 1 –161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1927. The Future of an Illusion. S.E., 21, 1 –56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1930. Civilization and its Discontents. S.E., 21, 57–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1939. Moses and Monotheism. S.E., 23, 7 –137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, K., Haapala, A., Heinamaa, S., Klockars, K., & Rasanen, P. (Eds.). 2018. In Chiasmatic encounters: Art, Ethics, and Politics. London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, J., C. Dare, and A. Holder. 1973. The Patient and the Analyst. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurice Apprey.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This Review Symposium is based on Freud as a Cultural Theorist: On Human Nature and Civilizing Process, by Howard L. Kaye (London and New York: Routledge, 2019).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Apprey, M. Chiasmatic Crossings Between Freud’s Clinical Projects and Social Concerns. Soc 57, 276–280 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-020-00479-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-020-00479-2

Keywords

Navigation