Advertisement

Society

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 41–52 | Cite as

Cocooned from Crime: The Relationship Between Video Games and Crime

  • Kevin McCaffree
  • K. Ryan Proctor
Social Science and Public Policy

Abstract

The majority of research on the relationship between video game playing behavior and crime has been conducted by psychologists, has focused only on violent videogames, and suffers from two major shortcomings. First, psychologists have adopted correlational or experimental methodologies that do not in fact assess the empirical relationship between video game playing behavior and crime. Instead, they examine the relationship between video game playing behavior and aggression, and then infer research findings have social implications related to crime. Second, when making such inferences, these studies presume that meso and macro level phenomena are nothing more than the aggregated consequences of micro level events. Recent studies, however, have raised questions surrounding these two components of psychological research, as they have identified negative relationships between video game playing behavior and crime at county and national levels. In this study, we propose that these seemingly contradictory results can be explained using routine activities theory (Cohen and Felson 1979). We contend that video game playing behavior, particularly insofar as it occurs within the home, alters the routine activities of individuals in such a way as to decrease the number of criminal opportunities present within a society. We provide an initial test of this hypothesis using UCR, CPS, and Census data. As predicted by routine activities theory, we find that rates of video game playing behavior in the home are negatively associated with both violent and property crime.

Keywords

Routine activities theory Crime Video games Media Community Public Health 

Further Reading

  1. Adachi, P. J. C., & Willoughby, T. 2011. The Effect of Violent Video Games on Aggression: Is it More than Just the Violence? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(1), 55–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2010.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D. 1994. Using Panel Data to Estimate the Effects of Events. Sociological Methods & Research, 23(2), 174–199.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124194023002002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison, P. D. 2009. Fixed Effects Regression Models. Los Angeles:Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. A., Gentile, D. A., & Buckley, K. E. 2007. Violent Video Game Effects on Children and Adolescents: Theory, Research, and Public Policy. Oxford:Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., et al. 2010. Violent Video Game Effects on Aggression, Empathy, and Prosocial Behavior in Eastern and Western Countries: A Meta-analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 151–173.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Applebaum, M., Calvert, S., Dodge, K., Graham, S., Hall, G., Hamby, S., & Hedges, L. 2015. American Psychological Association Taskforce on Violent Media Technical Report on the Review of the Violent Video Game Literature. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2015/08/technical-violent-games.pdf.
  7. Barlett, C. P., Harris, R. J., & Baldassaro, R. 2007. Longer You Play, The More Hostile You Feel: Examination of First Person Shooter Video Games and Aggression During Video Game Play. Aggressive Behavior, 33(6), 486–497.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, R. R. 1991. Routine Activities: A Cross-National Assessment of a Criminological Perspective. Social Forces, 70(1), 147–163.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/70.1.147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breuer, J., Vogelgesang, J., Quandt, T., & Festl, R. 2015. Violent Video Games and Physical Aggression: Evidence for a Selection Effect Among Adolescents. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(4), 305–328.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bureau of Economic Analysis 2014. Personal Consumption Expenditures by State, 1997–2012 (Prototype Estimates) [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/pce/pce_newsrelease.htm.
  11. Bureau of Labor Statistics 2015. American Time Use Survey: Multi-Year Microdata Files. July 9, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/tus/datafiles_0314.htm.
  12. Clodfelter, T. A., Turner, M. G., Hartman, J. L., & Kuhns, J. B. 2010. Sexual Harassment Victimization During Emerging Adulthood: A Test of Routine Activities Theory and a General Theory of Crime. Crime & Delinquency, 56(3), 455–481.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128708324665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, L. E. 1981. Modeling Crime Trends: a Criminal Opportunity Perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18(1), 138–164.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002242788101800109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. 1979. Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, L. E., Felson, M., & Land, K. C. 1980. Property Crime Rates in the United States: A Macrodynamic Analysis, 1947-1977; With Ex Ante Forecasts for the Mid-1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 86(1), 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cornish, D., & Clark, R. [1986] 2014. Introduction. In D. B. Cornish & R. V. Clarke (Eds.), The Reasoning Criminal (pp. 1–16). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. De Hoyos, R. E., & Sarafidis, V. 2006. Testing for Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel-Data Models. Stata Journal, 6(4), 482–496.Google Scholar
  18. Engelhardt, C. R., Bartholow, B. D., Kerr, G. T., & Bushman, B. J. 2011. This Is Your Brain on Violent Video Games: Neural Desensitization to Violence Predicts Increased Aggression Following Violent Video Game Exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 1033–1036.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Entertainment Software Association 2015. More than 150 Million Americans Play Video Games [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.theesa.com/article/150-million-americans-play-video-games/.
  20. Federal Bureau of Investigation 2010. Uniform Crime Reports. Retrieved from http://www.ucrdatatool.gov/Search/Crime/State/OneYearofData.cfm.
  21. Ferguson, C. J., & Dyck, D. 2012. Paradigm Ahange in Aggression Research: The Time Has Come to Retire the General Aggression Model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(3), 220–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flood, S., King, M., Ruggles, S., & Warren, J. R. 2015. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 4.0. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 4.0 https://cps.ipums.org/cps/index.shtml.
  23. Fox, J. G., & Sobol, J. J. 2000. Drinking Patterns, Social Interaction, and Barroom Behavior: A Routine Activities Approach. Deviant Behavior, 21(5), 429–450.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620050085834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greitemeyer, T. 2014. Intense Acts of Violence DuringVideo Game Play Make Daily Life Aggression Appear Innocuous: A New Mechanism Why Violent Video Games Increase Aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 52–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greitemeyer, T., & Mügge, D. O. 2014. Video Games Do Affect Social Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effects of Violent and Prosocial Video Game Play. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213520459.
  26. Hasan, Y., Bègue, L., Scharkow, M., & Bushman, B. J. 2013. The More You Play, the more Aggressive You Become: A Long-term Experimental Study of Cumulative Violent Video Game Effects on Hostile Expectations and Aggressive Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(2), 224–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. 1986. 2002. The Distinction Between Crime and Criminality. In J. H. Laub (Ed.), The Craft of Criminology (pp. 187–201). New Brunswick: Transaction Publisher.Google Scholar
  28. Konijn, E. A., Nije Bijvank, M., & Bushman, B. J. 2007. I Wish I Were a Warrior: The Role of Wishful Identification in the Effects of Violent Video Games on Aggression in Adolescent Boys. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1038–1044.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kringen, J. A., & Felson, M. 2014. Routine Activities Approach. In G. Bruinsma, & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 1ed (pp. 4544–4551). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Markey, P. M., Markey, C. N., & French, J. E. 2015. Violent Video Games and Real-world Violence: Rhetoric Versus Data. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(4), 277–295.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Messner, S. F., & Blau, J. R. 1987. Routine Leisure Activities and Rates of Crime: A Macro-Level Analysis. Social Forces, 65(4), 1035–1052.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/65.4.1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Messner, S. F., & Tardiff, K. 1985. The Social Ecology of Urban Homicide: An Application of the “Routine Activities” Approach. Criminology, 23(2), 241–267.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1985.tb00336.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miethe, T. D., Stafford, M. C., & Long, J. S. 1987. Social Differentiation in Criminal Victimization: A Test of Routine Activities/Lifestyle Theories. American Sociological Review, 52(2), 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. 1998. Predicting Risks of Larceny Theft Victimization: A Routine Activity Analysis Using Refined Lifestyle Measures. Criminology, 36(4), 829–858.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01267.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. 1999. A Routine Activity Theory Explanation for Women's Stalking Victimizations. Violence Against Women, 5(1), 43–62.  https://doi.org/10.1177/10778019922181149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York:Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sampson, R. J., & Wooldredge, J. D. 1987. Linking the Micro- and Macro-Level Dimensions of Lifestyle-Routine Activity and Opportunity Models of Predatory Victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3(4), 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, W. R., Frazee, S. G., & Davison, E. L. 2000. Furthering the Integration of Routine Activity and Social Disorganization Theories: Small Units of Analysis and the Study of Street Robbery as a Diffusion Process. Criminology, 38(2), 489–524.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00897.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. StataCorp 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station:StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  40. United States Census Bureau 2012. Intercensal Estimates. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/popest/data/intercensal/st-co/characteristics.html.
  41. United States Census Bureau 2015. Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/did/www/saipe/data/statecounty/data/index.html.
  42. United States Census Bureau n.d. Population, Housing Units, Area, and Density: 2000. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
  43. Ward, M. R. 2011. Video Games and Crime. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(2), 261–273.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2010.00216.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams, D. 2006. Why Game Studies Now? Gamers Don't Bowl Alone. Games and Culture, 1(1), 13–16.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412005281774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zimring, F. E. 2007. The Great American Crime Decline. Oxford:Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyIndiana-Purdue UniversityFort WayneUSA
  2. 2.Department of Law and Justice StudiesAvila UniversityKansas CityUSA

Personalised recommendations