Advertisement

Society

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 439–444 | Cite as

Pluralism in the Mind and the Structure of Cognitive Minorities

  • Silke Steets
Symposium: Peter Berger’s “Two Pluralisms” in Europe
  • 104 Downloads

Abstract

In his book The Many Altars of Modernity Peter L. Berger (2014) called for the replacement of secularization theory, which in his view no longer has much relevance today, with a theory of (religious) pluralism. Such a theory must encompass two levels, the level of the mind and the level of society. In this paper I will focus on the level of mind and explain some of the conceptual linkages with the level of society which Berger only touches upon in his book. The paper’s main purpose, however, is to sketch out a framework in which Berger’s ideas on “pluralism in the mind” could be investigated empirically. I will argue to focus on “cognitive minorities”, that is, on groups of people whose understanding of the world differs significantly from that of their social environment. As concrete cases I suggest a comparative study of a religious group (Evangelical Protestants) in a strongly secularized city (Leipzig, Germany) and a group of skeptics and seekers (Unitarians) in a city characterized by evangelical religiosity (Dallas, Texas). With the help of these settings – that is my thesis – it will be possible to investigate what Berger formulated as the central issue in his pluralism theory: How is it possible for people to integrate religious and secular worldviews in their minds, more or less simultaneously?

Keywords

Cognitive minorities Cognitive dissonances Framework conflicts Relevance structures Religious pluralism Peter L. Berger 

Further Reading

  1. Berger, P. L. 1967. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P. L. 1970. A Rumor of Angels: Modern society and the rediscovery of the supernatural. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P. L. 2014. The Many Altars of Modernity: Toward a paradigm for religion in a pluralist age. Boston/Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L.. & Luckmann, T. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  5. Center for the Study of Global Christianity. 2013. Christianity in its Global Context, 1970–2020. http://www.gordonconwell.edu/resources/documents/1ChristianityinitsGlobalContext.pdf. [as of: May 7, 2016].
  6. Eisenstadt, S. N. 2000. Multiple Modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  7. Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford Universeity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gabriel, K. 2013. Bilanz 20 Jahre nach der Wende: Säkularisierung oder multiple Modernen? Soziologische Revue, 36(2), 162–168.Google Scholar
  9. Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  10. Goffman, E. 1986. Frame Analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Knoblauch, H. 2009. Populäre Religion: Auf dem Weg in eine spirituelle Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M./New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  12. Pew Research Center. 2015. Religious Landscape Study 2014. http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study [as of: December 19, 2015].
  13. Pickel, G. & Sammet, K. (Eds.). 2010. Religion und Religiosität im vereinigten Deutschland: Zwanzig Jahre nach dem Umbruch. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Pollack, D. & Müller, O. 2013. Religionsmonitor – Religiosität und Zusammenhalt in Deutschland. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  15. Pollack, D.. & Rosta, G. 2015. Religion in der Moderne: Ein internationaler Vergleich. Frankfurt a.M./New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  16. Schutz, A. & Luckmann, T. 1973. The Structures of the Life-World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Soeffner, H.-G. 1986. Handlung – Szene – Inszenierung. Zur Problematik des "Rahmen"-Konzeptes bei der Analyse von Interaktionsprozessen. In Kallmeyer, W. (Ed.), Kommunikationstypologie: Handlungsmuster, Textsorten, Situationstypen (pp. 73–91). Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
  18. Statistisches Landesamt des Freistaates Sachsen. 2013. Zensus 2011: Bevölkerung im Freistaat Sachsen am 9. Mai 2011 nach demografischen Grundmerkmalen. http://www.statistik.sachsen.de/html/869.htm [as of: December 19, 2015].
  19. Strhan, A. 2015. Aliens and Strangers? The struggle for coherence in the everyday lives of Evangelicals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Wohlrab-Sahr, M. & Burchardt, M. 2012. Multiple Secularities: Toward a Cultural Sociology of Secular Modernities. Comparative Sociology, 11(6), 875–909.Google Scholar
  21. Wohlrab-Sahr, M., Karstein, U. & Schmidt-Lux, T. 2009. Forcierte Säkularität: Religiöser Wandel und Generationendynamik im Osten Deutschlands. Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  22. Wuthnow, R. 2012. The God Problem: Expressing faith and being reasonable. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wuthnow, R. 2014. Rough Country: How Texas became America’s most powerful Bible-belt state. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humanities Centre for Advanced Studies, “Multiple Secularities – Beyond the West, Beyond Modernities”Leipzig UniversityLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations