Society

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 18–22 | Cite as

Economics of Sex: Cost-Benefit Analysis

Symposium: Sex and Controversy

Abstract

The article presents an application of the cost-benefit analysis to human sexual behavior. We suggest that an event or occasion which lowers the costs of sex – such as increasing free time, decreasing health risks of sexually transmitted diseases or lowering the probability of parenthood (or costs connected with parenthood) – usually leads to an increase in sexual activity. Although the reviewed studies concerning these effects confirm our predictions, findings are not robust, e.g. a vaccination against STDs does not always lead to an increase in sexual activity. In the conclusion, we make several socioeconomic recommendations resulting from the application of the economics of sex.

Keywords

Cost-benefit analysis Sexual behavior Opportunity costs STDs Natural disasters Contraception Abortion Homosexuality 

Further Reading

  1. Bednarczyk, R. A., Davis, R., Ault, K., Orenstein, W., & Omer, S. B. 2012. Sexual activity–related outcomes after human papillomavirus vaccination of 11- to 12-year-olds. Pediatrics, 130(5), 798–805. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brewer, G., & Hendrie, C. A. 2011. Evidence to suggest that copulatory vocalizations in women are not a reflexive consequence of orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(3), 559–564. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9632-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burlando, A. 2014. Power outages, power externalities, and baby booms. Demography, 51(4), 1477–1500. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0316-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chesson, H. W. 2012. Sexonomics: a commentary and review of selected sexually transmitted disease studies in the economics literature. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 39(3), 161–166. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182389a11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dee, T. S. 2008. Forsaking all others? The effects of same-sex partnership laws on risky sex. The Economic Journal, 118(530), 1055–1078. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02160.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Durrance, C. P. 2013. The effects of increased access to emergency contraception on sexually transmitted disease and abortion rates. Economic Inquiry, 51(3), 1682–1695. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00498.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans, R., Hu, Y., & Zhao, Z. 2010. The fertility effect of catastrophe: U.S. hurricane births. Journal of Population Economics, 23(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1007/s00148-008-0219-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fetzer, T., Pardo, O., & Shanghavi, A. 2014. More than an Urban Legend: The long-term socio-economic Effects of Unplanned Fertility Shocks. unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  9. Francis, A. M. 2008. The economics of sexuality: the effect of HIV/AIDS on homosexual behavior in the United States. Journal of Health Economics, 27(3), 675–689. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Francis, A. M. 2013. The wages of sin: how the discovery of penicillin reshaped modern sexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(1), 5–13. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0018-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Francis, A. M., Mialon, H. M., & Peng, H. 2012. In sickness and in health: same-sex marriage laws and sexually transmitted infections. Social Science & Medicine, 75(8), 1329–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klick, J., Neelsen, S., & Stratmann, T. 2012. The relationship between abortion liberalization and sexual behavior: international evidence. American Law and Economics Review, 14(2), 457–487. doi: 10.1093/aler/ahs012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lakdawalla, D., Sood, N., & Goldman, D. 2006. HIV breakthroughs and risky sexual behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(3), 1063–1102. doi: 10.1162/qjec.121.3.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayhew, A., Kowalczyk Mullins, T. L., Ding, L., Rosenthal, S. L., Zimet, G. D., Morrow, C., & Kahn, J. A. 2014. Risk perceptions and subsequent sexual behaviors after HPV vaccination in adolescents. Pediatrics, 133(3), 404–411. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mialon, H. M. 2012. The economics of faking ecstasy. Economic Inquiry, 50(1), 277–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00379.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Posner, R. A. 1994. Sex and reason. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ressler, R. W., Waters, M. S., Hill, R. C., & Watson, J. K. 2005. Welfare payments and the spread of HIV in the United States. Contemporary Economic Policy, 23(1), 40–49. doi: 10.1093/cep/byi004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ressler, R. W., Waters, M. S., & Watson, J. K. 2006. Contributing factors to the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 65(4), 943–961. doi: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2006.00483.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tucker, J. D. 2013. The social and policy context of curing syphilis: commentary on Francis (2013). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(8), 1381–1381. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0163-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Udry, J. R. 1970. The effect of the great blackout of 1965 on births in New York City. Demography, 7(3), 325–327. doi: 10.2307/2060151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business AdministrationUniversity of Economics in PraguePragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Social and Economic StudiesJ. E. Purkyně University in Ústí nad LabemÚstí nad LabemCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations