Skip to main content
Log in

Charisma Research, Knowledge Growth and Disciplinary Shifts: a Holistic View

  • Social Science and Public Policy
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In everyday language, charisma has been used to refer to a broad spectrum of human relations, from romantic love to admiration for certain extraordinary abilities of public figures. Historically, the term has been used to describe “a gift of divine grace,” an attribute of magical magnetism and the power of a religious or secular leader as seen by that person’s followers. Over time, the term became detached from its religious origin although the importance of this source is still acknowledged in present-day research on the term. The present, structural analysis observes the knowledge growth in charisma research, as well as disciplinary shifts that the term charisma has undergone over time. The results of the analyses show that the focus of charisma studies has shifted from the emotional (religious) to the socio-political arena and from there to the management domain. As the amount of knowledge on charisma grew, research on this subject evolved into a mixture of emotional (psychology) and rational (business and management) research issues. In the new millennium, though, charisma studies have been characterized mostly by the management/business domain. It is evident from this study that although charisma is a contextual phenomenon, it still permits multidisciplinary treatment. In addition to bibliometric data on the current state of research on the subject, several indicators of future research directions and interest are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • American Heritage Dictionary. 1981. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Company.

  • Apter, D. E. 1968. Nkrumah, Charisma and Coup. Daedalus, 97(3), 757–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. 1985. Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. 1968 [1838–1843]. Collected Works. London: University of London, Athlone Press.

  • Beyer, J. M. 1999. Taming and Promoting Charisma to Change Organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandarkan, M.A. 2002. Charisma: A Component Architecture for Parallel Programming. Ph.D. dissertation, Computer Science, Graduate School, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

  • Camic, C. 1980. Charisma: Its Varieties, Preconditions and Consequences. Journal of Sociological Inquiry, 50, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, D. 1995. Give Me Some Skin–The Charisma of the Aztec Warrior. History of Religion, 35(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. 1989. The Charismatic Leader. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. 1988. Charismatic Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daryn, G. 1998. Weeping in the Taiwanese Buddhist Charismatic Movement. Ethnology, 37(4), 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1965 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: Free Press.

  • Eatwell, R. 2002. The Rebirth of Charisma? Concepts and Theories and the Problem of Operationalisation. Available online at: www.ceri-sciences-po.org.

  • Eatwell, R. 2006. The Concept and Theory of Charismatic Leadership. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 7(2), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia Britannica. 1981. Vol. 2, 753, Chicago: Benton Publishers.

  • Feldman, S. P. 1986. Culture, Charisma and the CEO–An Essay on the Meaning of High Office. Human Relations, 39(3), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. P., & Shepsle, K. A. 1989. Formal Theories of Leadership: Agents, Agenda, Agenda Setting and Entrepreneurs. In B. D. Jones (Ed.), Leadership and Politics. Lawrence: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1959 [1921]. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. New York: Norton.

  • Gardner, W. L., & Avolio, B. J. 1998. The Charismatic Relationship: A Dramaturgical Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 7(2), 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, R., & Swatos, W. (Eds.). 1986. Charisma, History, and Social Structure. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer, E. 1951. The True Believer (pp. 129–151). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Spangler, W. D., & Woycke, J. 1991. Personality and Charisma in the United States Presidency–A Psychological Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 364–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. 1978 [1800]. A Treatise of Human Nature (ed. L. Selby- Bigge). London: Oxford University Press.

  • Journal Citation Report. 2006. ISI Web of Knowledge. Available online at: http://portal.isiKnowledge.com/jcr/portal.cgi/jcr.

  • Keren, M. 1983. Ben Gurion and the Intellectuals: Power, Knowledge, and Charisma. Dekalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon, G. 1952 [1896]. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. London: Ernest Benn.

  • Lindholm, C. 1990. Charisma. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, J. (Ed.). 2003. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, A. J. 1998. Communicating Research. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. 1975 [1859]. On Liberty. New York: Norton.

  • Nietzsche, F. 1977 [1888]. The Twilight of the Idols and the Anti-Christ. Harmondsworth, Eng.: Penguin.

  • Oakes, L. 1977. Prophetic Charisma: The Psychology of Revolutionary Religious Personalities. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. 2006. In B. Simon (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Oxford Dictionary of Science. 2003. In J. Daintith (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Rieff, P. 2007. Charisma. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J. 1974. Beauty and Charisma: A Comment on A. Schweitzer’s Theory and Political Charisma. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(2), 182–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, A. 1974. Theory and Political Charisma. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(2), 150–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Science Citation Index. 2006. ISI Web of Knowledge. Available online at: http://portal.isiknowledge.com.

  • Shamir, B. 1991. The Charismatic Relationship: Alternative Explanations and Predictions. Leadership Quarterly, 2(2), 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shils, E. 1965. Charisma, Order and Status. American Sociological Review, 30(2), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 2004 [1776–1759]. Selected Philosophical Writings. Exeter, Eng.: Imprint Academic.

  • Sohm, R. 1962 [1895]. Outlines of Church History. Boston: Beacon.

  • Sullivan, L.J. 2006. In-Focus Clopidogral and Aspirin vs. Aspirin Alone for the Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events (CHRISMA trial). National Electronic Library for Medicine (NHS). Available online at: http://www.nelm.nhs.uk/search/search.aspx.

  • Tarde, G. 1903. The Laws of Imitation. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, M. 1981. The Theory of the Two Charismas. Blue Ridge Summit: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1947 [1900]. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.

  • Weber, M. 1954 [1900]. Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. In M. Reinstein (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Wegener, B. 1992. Concepts and Measurement of Prestige. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 253–280.

  • Winer, J., Jobe, T., & Ferono, C. 1984. Toward a Psychoanalytic Theory of the Charismatic Relationship. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 12–13, 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. 1998. Leadership in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avishag Gordon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tal, D., Gordon, A. Charisma Research, Knowledge Growth and Disciplinary Shifts: a Holistic View. Soc 52, 351–359 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-015-9911-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-015-9911-5

Keywords

Navigation