Skip to main content
Log in

Freedom, Choice and Public Well-Being: Some Psychological Perspectives

  • Symposium: The Scope and Reach of the Regulatory State
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Optimization of well being with minimal regulations seems like a reasonable goal. The problems (and recent progress) in measuring well being are described. The complex meanings of freedom are discussed, with a contrast between “actual” and perceived freedom. Then, the limitations of humans as decision makers in the current complex world in which decisions may have global impact, are described. For the domain of regulations related to food and public health, it is noted that our current scientific knowledge is limited, and policy is influenced by political as well as scientific factors. The risks of misguided regulations are substantial. Finally, the determinants of decisions are described, with particular emphasis on moralization: the historical conversion of a preference into a moral value, as with cigarette smoking in the United States. The consequences and causes of moralization are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Baron, J. 2008. Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. 2009. Belief overkill in political judgments. (Special issue on Psychological Approaches to Argumentation and Reasoning, edited by L. Rips). Informal Logic, 29, 368{378.

  • Baron, J. 1995. Myside bias in thinking about abortion. Think Reason, 1, 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J., & Spranca, M. 1997. Protected values. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 70, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, L. L., Marlin, D. W., & Rotter, J. 1984. Eating as the “means” activity in a contingency: Effects on young children’s food preference. Child Dev, 55, 431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, A. M. 2007. The cigarette century: The rise, fall, and deadly persistence of the product that defined America New Yori: Basic Books.

  • Brandt, A., & Rozin, P. (Eds.). 1997. Morality and Health. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. 1978. Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? J Pers Soc Psychol, 36, 917–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, H. 1965. The pattern of human concerns (Vol. 4). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. 2001. Association learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychol Bull, 127(6), 853–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. 1985. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess, 49, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Helliwell, J. F., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). 2010. International differences in well-being. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. 1997. Taboo Trade-offs: Reactions to Transactions That Transgress the Spheres of Justice. Political Psychology, 18, 255–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. 1999. Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York: Russell Sage.

  • Haidt, J. 2012. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. 2013. World Happiness report 2013. New York: Earth Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeman, R., Fischler, C., Rozin, P., & Shields, C. 2011. Medical doctors’ attitudes and beliefs about diet and health are more like those of their lay countrymen (France, Germany, Italy, U.K. and U.S.A.) than those of doctors in other Western countries. Appetite, 56, 558–563.

  • Payer, L. 1996. Medicine and Culture. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pliner, P., Rozin, P., Cooper, M., & Woody, G. 1985. Role of specific postingestional effects and medicinal context in the acquisition of liking for tastes. Appetite, 6, 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P. 1991. Family resemblance in food and other domains: The family paradox and the role of parental congruence. Appetite, 16, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., & Singh, L. 1999. The moralization of cigarette smoking in America. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 8, 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P. 1999. The process of moralization Psychological Science, 10, 218–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Hill, J. O., Levitsky, D. A., & Wansink, B (2014) A myth about a myth: The promise of accumulated small environmental changes for reducing obesity and improving the quality of diets. (submitted manuscript).

  • Rozin, P., Kabnick, K., Pete, E., Fischler, C., & Shields, C. 2003. The ecology of eating: Part of the French paradox results from lower food intake in French than Americans, because of smaller portion sizes. Psychol Sci, 14, 450–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. I. 2008. Living well: A self-determination theory perspective of eudaimonia. J Happiness Stud, 9, 139–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholderer, J., & Frewer, L. J. 2003. The biotechnology communication paradox: experimental evidence and the need for a new strategy. Journal of consumer policy, 26(2), 125–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S., Taggart, S., Baron, J., & Rozin, P. 2014. The natural halo effect. (manuscript in preparation).

  • Schwartz, B. 2004. The paradox of choice: Why less is more. New York: Ecco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. 2012. Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being.New York: Free Press

  • Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. 1997. The "big three" of morality: autonomy, community, and divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E, (2003) Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 320-324.

  • Tetlock, P. E. 1986. A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. J Pers Soc Psychol, 50, 819–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. 2008. Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C. R., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. 1997. Jobs, careers and callings: A tripartite categorization of people's relations to their work. J Res Pers, 31, 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. 1968. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J Pers Soc Psychol, 9, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, D. A., Rozin, P., Aron, M., & Kulish, C. 1983. Conditioned enhancement of human's liking for flavors by pairing with sweetness. Learn Motiv, 14, 338–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Rozin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rozin, P. Freedom, Choice and Public Well-Being: Some Psychological Perspectives. Soc 51, 237–246 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9770-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9770-5

Keywords

Navigation