The advent of public sociology over the past decade represents the end of a string of crisis moments in sociology. Since the 1950s and, especially, the 1960s, sociology was argued to be in a crisis because the discipline was thought to be conservative and contributing to sustain the status quo. As a result, the 1970s witnessed a radicalization of sociology, but the 1980s saw a general decline of sociology. Upon a resurgence during the 1990s, the crisis advocates have come back with a vengeance in the form of a renewed commitment to a heavily politicized sociology under the heading of public sociology, a perspective that is now thoroughly institutionalized and widely embraced. In sociology, the effects of the 1960s thus began to be felt in earnest some 40 years late.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Article II of the ASA constitution reads: “The objectives of the Association shall be to stimulate and improve research, instruction, and discussion, and to encourage cooperative relations among persons engaged in the scientific study of society.” http://www.asanet.org/about/constitution.cfm
After 2004, several sociology departments spontaneously began to self-identify as having a special interest or concentration in public sociology. Examples include departments at George Mason University, Ithaca College, Florida Atlantic University, American University, and UC-Berkeley (Deflem 2005). Based on an online search, the number of departments explicitly espousing a public sociology agenda has in recent years increased manifold and now also includes Missouri State University, Syracuse University, Saint Louis University, the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Salem State University, Humboldt State University, and Baker University, among others (Google search, October 30, 2012).
When my course “Lady Gaga and the Sociology of the Fame” at the University of South Carolina was first announced late October 2010, it became the number-one Lady Gaga news story in the world, with multiple thousands of news reports and commentaries appearing on the internet, in print, and on radio and television. Sadly indicative of the public perception of sociology but ironically also confirming the societal relevance of fame and celebrity, the course objectives were routinely misunderstood, not only by the sensationalist entertainment media, but also by certain conservative outlets, where the course was misinterpreted as part of a non-academic trend in higher education (e.g., Allen 2011) when the exact opposite was true (Deflem 2012). In organized sociology, the situation was even more troublesome. The ASA newsletter Footnotes published two notices about the course (mentioning only three media sources) despite the fact that I was no longer a member of the Association and had not given permission for the notices to be published. Public sociologists even claim what is not theirs.
An article in the American Sociological Review (Volschoa and Kelly 2012) was recently received on a blog to imply that sociologists had declared that Republicans would be bad for America (Science Codex 2012). Even more interestingly, in the comment section, somebody remarked that “anthropologists” should not write such work, especially not just before a national election, to which another commentator remarked: “If only they were anthropologists, then it would just be 90 % non-scientific. Since this was a sociologist and a political scientist this was instead 100 % made up.”
Alexander, J. 2012. Obama’s Downcast Eyes. The Huffington Post, October 4, 2012. Available online: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-c-alexander/obama-debate-performance_b_1938755.html.
Allen, C. 2011. Lady Gaga Makes It to Harvard. Minding the Campus, November 18, 2011. Available online: http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2011/11/lady_gaga_makes_it_to_harvard.html.
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. 2011. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
ASA. 2004. Public Sociologists Broke Records in San Francisco. Footnotes, September/October 2004. Available online: http://www.asanet.org/footnotes/septoct04/indextwo.html.
ASA. 2009. Report of the American Sociological Association’s Committee on the Status of Women in Sociology. Available online: http://www.asanet.org/about/Council_Statements/Rpt%20of%20Cmte%20Status%20Women%20Aug%202009.pdf.
ASA (American Sociological Association). 1999. Public Forum (includes resignation letter by Michael Burawoy, and response by Alejandro Portes, ASA President). Footnotes, July/August 1999. Available online: http://www.asanet.org/footnotes/julaug99/pf.html.
ASA. Website of the American Sociological Association. Available online: http://www.asanet.org/.
Becker, H. S., & Rau, W. C. 2001. Sociology in the 1990s. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s Wrong with Sociology (pp. 121–129). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Burawoy, M. 2002. Personal Statement (for candidacy as President-Elect). Footnotes, March 2002, Available online: http://www.asanet.org/footnotes/mar02/fn11.html.
Cole, S. (Ed.). 2001a. What’s Wrong with Sociology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Cole, S. 2001b. Introduction: The Social Construction of Sociology. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s Wrong with Sociology (pp. 7–36). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Coleman, J. S. 1989. Response to the Sociology of Education Award. Academic Questions, 2(3), 76–78.
D’Antonio, W. V. 1992. Recruiting Sociologists in a Time of Changing Opportunities. In T. Halliday & M. Janowitz (Eds.), Sociology and Its Publics (pp. 99–136). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Dahrendorf, R. 1958. Out of Utopia: Toward a Reorientation of Sociological Analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 115–127.
Deflem, M. 2004a. The War in Iraq and the Peace of San Francisco: Breaking the Code of Public Sociology. Peace, War & Social Conflict, Newsletter of the ASA section, November 2004, pp. 3–5.
Deflem, M. 2004b. Large Mug, Mousepad, Infant Creeper, Bib, Dog T-Shirt: The Professional Group Revisited. Perspectives, the ASA Theory Section Newsletter, 27(4), 15.
Deflem, M. 2005. Public Sociology, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie, and Chevrolet. The Journal of Professional and Public Sociology 1(1), Article 4. Available online: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/jpps/vol1/iss1/4.
Deflem, M. 2012. The Presentation of Fame in Everyday Life: The Case of Lady Gaga. Margin, 1(Spring), 58–68.
Durkheim, E. (1895) 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. 2000. The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.
Fosse, E., & Gross, N. 2012. Why Are Professors Liberal? Theory & Society, 41, 127–168.
Foucault, M. (1975) 1977. Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books.
Gans, H. J. 1989. Sociology in America: The Discipline and the Public. American Sociological Association, 1988 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 54(1), 1–16.
Gans, H. J. 2002. Most of Us Should Become Public Sociologists. Footnotes, July/August, 2002. Available online: http://www.asanet.org/footnotes/julyaugust02/fn10.html.
Gans, H. J. 2011. How to Be a Public Intellectual: An Interview with Herbert Gans. The Public Intellectual, May 31, 2011. Available online: http://thepublicintellectual.org/2011/05/31/how-to-be-a-public-intellectual-an-interview-with-herbert-gans/.
Gouldner, A. W. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.
Hohm, C. F. 2008. Sociology in the Academy: How the Discipline is Viewed by Deans. Sociological Perspectives, 51(2), 235–258.
Horowitz, I. L. 1983. C. Wright Mills: An American Utopian. New York: The Free Press.
Horowitz, I. L. 1993. The Decomposition of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Huber, J. 2001. Institutional Perspectives on Sociology. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s Wrong with Sociology (pp. 293–318). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
ISA (International Sociological Association). Website of the International Sociological Association. Executive Committee 2010–2014. Available online: http://www.isa-sociology.org/cv/cv_michael_burawoy.htm.
Kantrowitz, B. 1992. Sociology’s Lonely Crowd. Newsweek, February 2, 1992. Available online: http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/1992/02/02/sociology-s-lonely-crowd.html.
Lemert, C. (1995) 2004. Sociology After the Crisis. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Lipset, S. M. 2001. The State of American Sociology. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s Wrong with Sociology (pp. 247–270). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Manza, J., & McCarthy, M. A. 2011. The Neo-Marxist Legacy in American Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 155–183.
Mills, C. W. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Parsons, T. 1965. The American Sociologist: Editorial Statement. The American Sociologist, 1(1), 2–3.
Rhoades, L. J. 1981. A History of the American Sociological Association, 1905–1980. Available online: http://www.asanet.org/about/Rhoades_History.cfm.
Rosich, K. J. 2005. A History of the American Sociological Association, 1981–2004. Available online: http://www.asanet.org/about/Centennial_History_Index.cfm.
Scelza, J., Spalter-Roth, R., & Mayorova, O. 2010. A Decade of Change: ASA Membership from 2000–2010. ASA Research Brief. Available online: http://www.asanet.org/images/research/docs/pdf/2010_asa_membership_brief.pdf.
Science Codex. 2012. Sociologist Declares Republicans Bad for America, World. October 1, 2012. Available online: http://www.sciencecodex.com/republican_strength_in_congress_aids_superrich_presidents_affiliation_has_no_effect-99316.
Sica, A., & Turner, S. (Eds.). 2005. The Disobedient Generation: Social Theorists in the Sixties. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Stinchcombe, A. L. 2001. Disintegrated Disciplines and the Future of Sociology. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s Wrong with Sociology (pp. 85–97). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Turner, S. P., & Turner, J. H. 1990. The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park: Sage.
USC Times. 2012. As Gamecocks, Our Stories Have No Limits. USC Times, Fall/Winter 2012. Available online: http://www.sc.edu/usctimes/PDFs/2012/12340_USC_times_Special.pdf.
Volschoa, T. W., & Kelly, N. J. 2012. The Rise of the Super-Rich: Power Resources, Taxes, Financial Markets, and the Dynamics of the Top 1 Percent, 1949 to 2008. American Sociological Review, 77(5), 679–699.
Weber, M. (1904) 1949. Objectivity in Social Science and Social Policy. In E. Shils & H. Finch (Eds.), The Methodology of Social Sciences (pp. 49–112). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Weber, M. (1918) 1958. Science as a Vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 129–156). New York: Oxford University Press.
Wikipedia. American Sociological Association. Available online: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Sociological_Association.
Wrong, D. H. 1961. The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology. American Sociological Review, 26(2), 183–193.
Yale Sociology Department website. Available online: http://www.yale.edu/sociology/.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deflem, M. The Structural Transformation of Sociology. Soc 50, 156–166 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-013-9634-4
- Public sociology
- Sociological profession
- Radical sociology
- Higher education