Advertisement

Society

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 65–72 | Cite as

Continuity in Change: Leftwing Coalitions in Uruguay and Chile

  • Laura Ymayo TartakoffEmail author
Global Society

Abstract

Coalitions have been critical for the reemergence of democracy and stability in Uruguay and Chile. Where do they come from? Why are they successful? To explore the role of history and ideologies in the formation and successes of two leftwing coalitions, Uruguay’s Frente Amplio (Broad Front) (FA) and Chile’s Concertación por la Demcracia (Concertación), the author traveled to South America. In Montevideo and Santiago, she spoke with professors and politicians, government officials and former Presidents. This essay will introduce the Uruguayan and Chilean political party systems, discuss how they have dealt with crimes committed by the dictatorships (1973–1990), and highlight the significance of the two coalitions. It will use the term “left” to designate parties which favor egalitarianism and statism, and claim to speak for the people, especially the underprivileged; the term “right” for those which favor liberty, individual initiative, equality of opportunity, and limited government.

Keywords

Coalitions Left Right Caudillismo Batllismo Herrerismo Populism Cold War Operation Cóndor Transition Amnesty Runoffs Frente Amplio Concertación por la Democracia Gender Quotas 

Further Reading

  1. Aldunate, A., Flisfisch, A., and Moulian, T. 1985. Estudio Sobre el Sistema de Partidos en Chile. Santiago: FLACSO.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barros, R. 2002. Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bitar, S. 1986. Chile: Experiment in Democracy. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
  5. Bitar, S. 1999. Isla 10 (10th ed.). Santiago: Pehuén Editores.Google Scholar
  6. Boeninger, E. 1997. Latin America’s Multiple Challenges. In L. Diamond, M. Plattner, Y. Chu, and H. Tien (Eds.), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bottinelli, O. 2000. “El ciclo electoral 1999–2000 y el sistema de partidos.” In Elecciones 1999/2000. Montevideo: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.Google Scholar
  8. Cantera Carlomagno, M. 1212. Lorenzo: El mundo íntimo del primer Batlle presidente. Montevideo: Editorial Fin de Siglo.Google Scholar
  9. Castañeda, J., and Morales, M. 2008. Leftovers: Tales of the Latin American Left. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Caula, N., & Silva, A. 2011. Ana, la Guerrillera: Una historia de Lucía Topolansky. Montevideo: Ediciones B.Google Scholar
  11. Cavarozzi, M. 2001. Transitions: Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, and Uruguay. In M. Garretón and E. Newman (Eds.), Democracy in Latin America: (Re)constructing political society. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Di Tella, T. 2004. History of Political Parties in Twentieth-Century Latin America. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Domínguez, F., Lievesley, G., and Ludlam, S. 2011. Right-wing Politics in the New Latin America: Reaction and Revolt. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  14. Fermandois, J. 2005. Mundo y fin de mundo: Chile en la política mundial 1900–2004. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
  15. Flisfisch, A., et al. 1981. El Futuro Democrático de Chile: cuatro visiones políticas. Santiago: Aconcagua.Google Scholar
  16. Fowler, W. (Ed.). 1997. Ideologues and Ideologies in Latin America. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  17. Garretón, M. 2003. Incomplete Democracy: Political Democratization in Chile and Latin America. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  18. Garretón, M., Cavarozzi, M., Cleaves, P., Gereffi, G., and Hartlyn, J. 2003. Latin America in the Twenty-First Century: Toward a New Sociopolitical Matrix. Miami: North–South Center Press at the University of Miami.Google Scholar
  19. Gillespie, C. 1991. Negotiating Democracy: Politicians and Generals in Uruguay. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Holmes, J. 2008. Terrorism and Democratic Stability Revisited (2nd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, N. 2011. 10 Años de la Bancada Bicameral Femenina en el Parlamento del Uruguay. Montevideo: Bancada Bicameral Femenina del Parlamento Uruguayo.Google Scholar
  22. Lanzaro, J. 2007. “The Uruguayan Party System: Transition within Transition.” In K. Lawson and P. Merkl (Eds.), When Parties Prosper: The Uses of Electoral Success. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  23. Lanzaro, J. (Ed.). 2011. Tipos de Presidencialismo y Coaliciones Políticas en América Latina. Buenos Aires: CLACSO (Consejo Latinoamricano de Ciencias Sociales).Google Scholar
  24. Lanzaro, J. 2011. “Uruguay: A Social Democratic Government in Latin America.” In S. Levitsky and K. Roberts (Eds.), Latin America’s Left Turn. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Moulián, T. 2002. El Sistema de Partidos en Chile. In M. Cavarozzi and J. Medina (Eds.), El Asedio de la Política: Los partidos latinoamericanos en la era neoliberal. Rosario: Homo Sapiens Ediciones.Google Scholar
  26. Navia, P. 2008. “The successful Chilean left: Neo-liberal and socialist.” In J. Castañeda and M. Morales (Eds.), Leftovers: Tales of the Latin American Left. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Newman, E. 2001. “Reconciliation.” In M. Garretón & E. Newman (Eds.), Democracy in Latin America: (Re)constructing political society. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Peeler, J. 2009. 3rd ed. Building Democracy in Latin America. Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Porzecanski, A. 1973. Uruguay’s Tupamaros, The Urban Guerrilla. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  30. Posner, P. 2009. “Local Democracy and Popular Participation in Chile and Brazil.” In P. Silva & H. Cleuren (Eds.), Widening Democracy: Citizens and Participatory Schemes in Brazil and Chile. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  31. Reid, M. 2009. Forgotten Continent: The Battle for Latin America’s Soul. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sanguinetti, J. 2010. La Agonía de una Democracia: Proceso de la caída de las instituciones en el Uruguay (1963–1973). Montevideo: Santillana.Google Scholar
  33. Sanguinetti, J. 2012. La Reconquista: Proceso de la restauración democrática en Uruguay (1980–1990). Montevideo: Taurus.Google Scholar
  34. Siavelis, P. 2008. “The End of the Unfinished Transition.” In J. Domínguez & M. Shifter (Eds.), Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Siavelis, P., and Morgenstern, S. (Eds.). 2008. Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Vanden, H. and Prevost, G. 2009. Politics of Latin America: The Power Game. Google Scholar
  37. Vanger, M. 2010. Uruguay’s José Batlle y Ordóñez: The Determined Visionary, 1915–1917. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Velázquez, C. 1968. La Política Internacional en el pensamiento de Luis Alberto de Herrera. Shrewsbury: Wilding and Son Ltd.Google Scholar
  39. Viereck, P. 1995. Tides and Continuities, Last and First Poems, 1995–1938. Fayetteville: The University of Arkansas Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations