Skip to main content
Log in

An Economist’s View of Marriage

  • Social Science and Public Policy
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article considers recent developments in the economic analysis of families. The usual economic analysis of families has considered families as household firms that produce goods and services. Recently this model of the household firm been challenged by an economic analysis of families that focuses on shared consumption in households rather than shared production. These challenges rest on the assumption that the basic economic problem for families is now coordination of taste and consumption rather than provision under conditions of scarcity. The article considers these challenges to the usual economic analysis of families and concludes that, in spite of the many changes to family structures in recent decades, the model of the household firm is still the most valid model of the family, especially for families with children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Becker, G. 1981 [1991]. A Treatise on the family. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belkin, L. 2008. When mom and dad share it all. New York Times Magazine, June 15, 2008.

  • Bergmann, B. 1995. Becker’s theory of the family: Preposterous conclusions. Feminist Economics, 1, 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A., & Stevenson, B. 2008. Women’s education and family behavior: Trends in marriage, divorce, and fertility. Research working paper.

  • Pollack, R. 2003. Gary Becker’s contributions to family and household economics. Review of Economics of the Household, 1, 111–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasser, A. C. 2005. Gender differences in physician pay: Tradeoffs between career and family. The Journal of Human Resources, XL(2), 477–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B. 2007. The impact of divorce laws on marriage-specific capital. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. 2006. Bargaining in the shadow of the law: Divorce laws and family distress. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. 2007. Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. 2008a. Marriage and the market. Cato Unbound, January 18, 2008.

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. 2008b. Divorce and children: What do we know? Cato Unbound, January 27.

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. 2008c. (De-)regulating the family. Cato Unbound, January 30, 2008.

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. 2008d. How should we think about the taxpayer consequences of divorce. Council on Contemporary Families, April 15, 2008.

  • Warren, E., & Tyagi, A. W. 2003. The two-income trap: Why middle-class parents are going broke. New York: Basic Books.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline Pfeffer Merrill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merrill, J.P. An Economist’s View of Marriage. Soc 47, 234–239 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9316-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9316-4

Keywords

Navigation