Skip to main content
Log in

Two Cheers for Capitalism?

  • Symposium: Peter Berger’s Achievement in Social Science
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to a popular view that I call “two cheers for capitalism,” capitalism’s effect on development is ambiguous and mixed. This paper empirically investigates that view. I find that it’s wrong. Citizens in countries that became more capitalist over the last quarter century became wealthier, healthier, more educated, and politically freer. Citizens in countries that became significantly less capitalist over this period endured stagnating income, shortening life spans, smaller gains in education, and increasingly oppressive political regimes. The data unequivocally evidence capitalism’s superiority for development. Full-force cheerleading for capitalism is well deserved and three cheers are in order instead of two.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Berger, P. L. 1974. Pyramids of sacrifice: Political ethics and social change. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. 1986. The capitalist revolution: Fifty propositions about prosperity, equality, and liberty. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J., & Lawson, R., with Norton, S. 2008. Economic freedom of the world: 2008 annual report. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute. Data retrieved from www.freetheworld.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T. 2007. Better off stateless: Somalia before and after government collapse. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 689–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T. 2008a. Escaping poverty: Foreign aid, private property, and economic development. Journal of Private Enterprise, 23, 39–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, P. T. 2008b. Media freedom, political knowledge, and participation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. 2009. The age of Milton Friedman. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1904 [1776]. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, E. Cannan (Ed.), (5th ed.). London: Methuen.

  • von Mises, L. 1949. Human action: A treatise on economics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Pete Boettke and Chris Coyne for comments and suggestions. The financial support of the Fund for the Study of Spontaneous Orders and the Mercatus Center at George Mason University is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter T. Leeson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leeson, P.T. Two Cheers for Capitalism?. Soc 47, 227–233 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9305-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9305-7

Keywords

Navigation