Abstract
Despite ample debates over the efficacy of school choice, theorizing has lagged behind and this hinders progress. Milton Friedman, the choice movement founder, never claimed that choice would improve academics; choice was inherently valuable and parents might demand anything. Choice advocates also exaggerate the remedial power of markets and proliferating academic options seldom brings academic diligence. Given free tutoring opportunities, those lagging behind reject them, and costs will usually be too high for most low achievers. Extensive schooling options already exist, so waging political battles to add more is unnecessary. Moreover, today’s supposed “school choice” is not genuine consumer choice no matter how educationally worthwhile; it is imposed from above san consumer input. Even when choice schools shine, it is unclear why. If free to chose, consumes may prefer non-academics. Finally, if choice qua choice is the standard, focusing on academic achievement is misdirected.
Similar content being viewed by others
Further Reading
Caplan, N., Whitmore, J. K., & Choy, M. H. 1992. The boat people and achievement in america: A study of family life, hard work and cultural values. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Chub, J. E., & Moe, T., 1990. Politics markets and american schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Coulson, A. 1999. Market education: The unknown history. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Publishers.
Friedman, M. with the assistance of Rose D. Friedman. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (“The Role of Government in Education” was originally published in 1955 in another volume.)
Steinberg, L. with B. Bradford Brown and Sanford M. Dornbusch. 1996. Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weissberg, R. Correctly Understanding “School Choice”. Soc 46, 324–332 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-009-9217-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-009-9217-6