Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Longevity Ancient and Modern

  • Symposium: Extending Life Indefinitely
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article examines illustrations from ancient and modern societies to consider the connections between power, social elites and knowledge of techniques to promote longevity. In pre-modern societies, knowledge of practices and substances to promote longevity were cultivated by elites such as the Chinese imperial court. In modern societies, new technologies—cryonics, cloning, stem-cell applications and nanotechnology—will offer exclusive and expensive methods for prolonging life for the rich. However one important difference between the ancient and modern world is that with secularization longevity is no longer connected with a moral life; longevity is not a reward for sanctity. We have democratized the ambition for long life but not necessarily its realization. The modern quest for longevity appears to be connected with the desire of Baby Boomer generations to hold on to their assets, but while modern medicine may help us to survive forever, it cannot tell us how to live forever.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Appleyard, B. 2007. How to Live Forever or Die Trying. On the New Immortality. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. 2008. The Living End. The Future of Death, Aging and Immortality. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. 1927. The Anatomy of Melancholy. London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, T. R. 1992. The Journey of Life. A Cultural History of Aging in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, G. F. 1923. Rejuvenation: How Steinach Makes People Young. New York: Seltzer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drexler, E. 1986. Engines of Creation, The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruman, G. J. 1966. A history of ideas about the prolongation of life: the evolution of prolongevity hypotheses to 1800. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 56(9), 1–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsley, M. 2008. “Mine is longer than yours. The New Yorker. April 7, pp. 38–43.

  • Kurzweil, R. & Grossman, T. 2004. Fantastic Voyage. Live Long Enough to Live for Ever. Rodale.www.rodalestore.com

  • Paravicini-Bagliani, A. 2000. The Pope’s Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veith, I. 1949. The Yellow Emperor’s Classic of Internal Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA, 02481, USA

    Bryan S. Turner

Authors
  1. Bryan S. Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan S. Turner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, B.S. Longevity Ancient and Modern. Soc 46, 255–261 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-009-9193-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-009-9193-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation