Abstract
The paper develops the idea of configuration of ownership to distinguish three primary political ideologies: (classical) liberalism, conservatism, and leftism. The liberal configuration is atomistic in its recognition of owners and ownership claims; it conforms closely to Adam Smith’s “commutative justice,” which Smith represented as a sort of social grammar. The conservative configuration also strives for a social grammar, but it counts among the set of owners certain spirit-lords such as God and Patria. The liberal and conservative configurations become isomorphic if and only if the ownership claims of the conservative spirit-lords are reduced to nothing. The left configuration ascribes fundamental ownership of resources to the people, the state, and sees laws as organizational house-rules into which one enters voluntary by choosing to remain within the polity; the type of justice that pertains is parallel to Smith’s “distributive justice,” which Smith associated with aspirational rules for achieving beauty in composition. The scheme illuminates why the left’s conception of liberty consists in civil liberties. The formulation of configurations is used to interpret the semantics of the three primary ideologies. Meanwhile, it is noted that actually existing parties and movements are admixtures of the three primary ideologies. For example, what makes Republicanism “conservative” is that it is relatively conservative; it by no means thoroughly or consistently rejects the precept of collective ownership by the polity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Further Reading
Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined communities. London: Verso.
Carey, G. W. 1998. Freedom and virtue: The conservative/libertarian debate. Wilmington: Intercollegiate Studies Institute.
Chwe, M. S.-Y. 2001. Rational ritual: Culture, coordination, and common knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fichte, J. G. 1968 [1808]. In G. A. Kelly (Ed.), Addresses to the German nation. New York: Harper Torchbook.
Friedman, D. D. 1994. A positive account of property rights. Social Philosophy and Policy, 11(2), 1–16 Summer.
Fuller, L. 1969. The morality of law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hayek, F. A. 1976. The mirage of social justice. Vol. 2 of law, legislation and libert. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. 1978. The atavism of social justice. In New studies in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas (pp. 57–68). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. 1979. The political order of a free people. Vol. 3 of law, legislation and liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. 1988. The fatal conceit: The errors of socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. 1983. The invention of tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, S., & Sunstein, C. R. 1999. The cost of rights. New York: Norton.
Hume, D. 1740. A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1978.
Hume, D. 1751. An inquiry concerning the principles of morals. New York: Bobbs-Merrill 1957.
Kirk, R. 1960. The conservative mind: From Burke to Eliot. Rev. ed. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Klein, D. B. 2005. The people’s romance: Why people love government (as much as they do). Independent Review, 10(1), 5–37.
Klein, D. B., & Barlett, H. 2008. Left out: A critique of Paul Krugman based on a comprehensive account of his New York Times Columns, 1997 through 2006. Econ Journal Watch, 5(1), 109–133.
Klein, D. B., & Clark, M. J. 2008. Direct and overall liberty: Areas and extent of disagreement. Mercatus Center Working Paper 08-38.
Lakoff, G. 2002. Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, F. S. 1996. In W. C. Dennis (Ed.), Defense of freedom and related essays. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund.
Murphy, L., & Nagel, T. 2002. The myth of ownership: Taxes and justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schelling, T. C. 1960. The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Smith, A. 1776. In R. H. Campbell, & A. S. Skinner (Eds.), An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford: Clarendon/Liberty Fund Edition.
Smith, A. 1790. In D. D. Raphael, & A. L. Macfie (Eds.),Theory of moral sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon/Liberty Fund Edition.
Tocqueville, A. de. 1969. In J. P. Mayer (Ed.), Democracy in America. Translated by G. Lawrence. New York: Doubleday
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klein, D.B. Resorting to Statism to Find Meaning. Soc 46, 137–146 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-008-9180-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-008-9180-7