Abstract
Historically, European economists, compared to their American counterpart, were more involved in public discussions of policy. In this paper it is argued that this has likely changed. The chief reasons seem to involve the European imitation of the academic ethos that is more prevalent in America. Features of this academic ethos include a more formalist orientation in graduate programs and an academic incentive system wherein professional journal publication is paramount and public discourse is relatively devalued. I suggest there is an inescapable ideological dilemma in addressing the costs and benefits of professors’ neglect of public discourse. The ideological character of academics compared with our own political sensibilities affect whether we want academics to influence public discourse or not. I use the history of academics as public intellectuals in Sweden to substantiate the change, and I use new data on Swedish social science academics to see whether those who participate in public discourse tend to have certain political and social views.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Further Reading
Berggren, N., Jordahl, H. & Stern C. 2007. The political opinions of Swedish social scientists. IFN Working Paper no. 77.
Björklund, A. 1996. Nationalekonomerna som syns i debatten och i de vetenskapliga tidskrifterna. In L. Jonung (Ed.), Ekonomerna i debatten – gör de någon nytta? Stockholm: Ekerlids Förlag.
Boschini, A. D., Lindquist, M. J., Pettersson, J., & Roine, J. 2004. Learning to lose a leg: casualties of PhD economics training in Stockholm. Econ Journal Watch, 1(2), 369–379.
Bude, H. 2005. On the trail of a public sociology—a commentary on Michael Buroway by Heinz Bude Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift fur Sozialwissenschaftliche. Forschung und Praxis, 56(4), 375–380.
Burawoy, M. 2005. 2004 American Sociological Association Presidential address: for public sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(2), 260–290.
Calmfors, L. 2007a. Begripligt men förödande att forskare flyr samhällsdebatten. Dagens Nyheter 2007-01-02
Calmfors, L. 2007b.Tendentiöst bruk av forskning vanligt i politiken. Dagens Nyheter 2007-02-06.
Carlsson, B., & Jonung, L. 2006. Knut Wicksell, Gustav Cassell, Eli Heckscher, Bertil Ohlin and Gunnar Myrdal on the role of the economist in public debate. Econ Journal Watch, 3(3), 511–550.
Charlton, B. G., & Andras, P. 2008. ‘Down-shifting’ among top UK scientists?—The decline of ‘revolutionary science’ and the rise of ‘normal science’ in the UK compared with the USA. Medical Hypotheses, in press. Retrieved January 1, 2008, from http://medicalhypotheses.blogspot.com/2008/01/uk-scientists-down-shift-to-second-rate_04.html.
Colander, D., & Klamer, A. 1987. The making of an economist. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(2), 95–111.
Etzioni, A. 2005. Bookmarks for public sociologists. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(23), 373–378.
Frey, B. S. & Eichenberger, R. 1992. Economics and economists: a European perspective. American Economic Review, 82(2), 216–220.
Frey, B. S., & Eichenberger, R. 1993. American and European economics and economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(4), 185–193.
Frey, B. S., Pommerehne, W. W., Schneider, F. & Gilbert, G. 1984. Consensus and dissension among economists: an empirical inquiry. American Economic Review, 74(5), 986–991.
Fuller, S. 2006. France’s last sociologist. Economy and Society, 35(2), 315–323.
Grauerholz, L., & Baker-Sperry, L. 2007. Feminist research in the public domain—risks and recommendations. Gender and Society, 21(2), 272–294.
Gylfason, T. 2006. An interview with Assar Lindbeck. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 10, 101–130.
Hauser, G. A. (Ed.) 2006. Forum: the nature and function of public intellectuals. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 39(2), 125–126.
Holmwood, J. 2007. Sociology as public discourse and professional practice: a critique of Michael Burawoy. Sociological Theory, 25(1), 46–66.
Inglis, C. 2005. Comments Michael Burawoy’s ASA presidential address. British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 383–386.
Johnson, H. G. 1973. National styles of economics research: the United States, The United Kingdom, Canada, and various European countries. Deadalus, 102(2), 65–73.
Klamer, A. 1995. A rhetorical perspective on the difference between European and American economists. Kyklos, 48(2), 231–240.
Krueger, A., et al. 1991. Report of the Commission on Graduate Education in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(September), 1035–1053.
Laberge, Y. 2006. Pierre Bourdieu (1930–2002) A tribute and a portrait. Reviews: sociology in the visual media. International Sociology, 21(3), 493–497.
Lindbeck, A. 2001. Economics in Europe. CESifo Forum, 2(1), 31–32.
Lindberg, H. 2007. The role of economists in liberalizing Swedish agriculture. Econ Journal Watch, 4(2), 213–229.
Lindqvist, T. 2003. Nationalekonomisk forskning i Sverige—publiceringar och rankning av forskare och institutioner, Ekonomisk Debatt, no. 3, pp. 21–32.
Posner, R. A. 2001. Public Intellectuals: a study of decline. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Sandelin, B. 1996. “The dissolution of the Swedish tradition” i A W Coats (red.), The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics. Annual Supplement to Volume 28, History of Political Economy. (Med Ann Veiderpass.)
Sandelin, B. 2000. The post-1945 development of economics and economists in Sweden. In A. W. Coats (Ed.), The development of economics in Western Europe since 1945 (pp. 142–164). London: Routledge.
Sandelin, B. 2001. The de-Germanization of Swedish economics. History of Political Economy, 3, 517–539.
Skedinger, P., & Johansson, D. 2004. In Sweden, anti-globalizationists dominate public discourse, econ profs do little. Econ Journal Watch, 1(1), 175–184.
Stigler, G. J. 1982. The economist as preacher and other essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Swartz, D. L. 2003. From critical sociology to public intellectuals: Pierre Bourdieu and politics. Theory and Society. Special Issue, The sociology of symbolic power: a special issue in memory of Pierre Bourdieu, 32(5/6), 791–823.
Turner, B. S. 2006. British sociology and public intellectuals: consumer society and imperial decline. British Journal of Sociology, 57(2), 169–188.
Wiles, P. 2004. Debate, policy and sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 55(1), 31–34.
Zetterberg, H. 1984. The rational humanitarians. Daedalus, 113, 75–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stern, C. European Professors as Public Intellectuals. Soc 46, 110–118 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-008-9177-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-008-9177-2