The Review of Black Political Economy

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 165–175 | Cite as

Caste and Religion-Based Wage Discrimination in the Indian Private Sector: Evidence from the Indian Human Development Survey

  • Nikolaus Axmann
  • Kendal Swanson
  • Victor Cuspinera Contreras
Article

Abstract

Using data from the Indian Human Development Survey, we examine evidence of caste and religion-based discrimination in the Indian private and public sector. Both Dalits and Adivasis show significant results of discrimination in the private sector, and benefit disproportionately from working in the public sector. This is strong evidence that at least some of the affirmative action policies in the public sector are proving effective. The policy implications are relevant: should similar affirmative action policies be implemented in the private sector? Further, this research suggests a path for further research to understand why protected castes do not benefit from affirmative action programs to the same extent as Dalits and Adivasis.

Keywords

Caste-based discrimination Religion-based discrimination Indian Human Development Survey Affirmative action Public sector affirmative action 

References

  1. Borooah, VK. Caste, Inequality, and Poverty in India. Review of Development Economics 9.3. 2005;399–414. Print.Google Scholar
  2. Census of India. 2001 Census Data, Scheduled castes and scheduled tribes. Retrieved March 3rd, 2014. 2011. http://censusindia.gov.in/.
  3. Deshpande, A. Affirmative Action in India and the United States World Development Report. 2006.Google Scholar
  4. Ely RJ, Thomas DA. Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group process and outcomes. Adm Sci Q. 2001;46:229–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glinskaya E, Lokshin M. Wage Differentials Between the Public and Private Sector in India. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3574. 2005. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/8987.
  6. Hnatkovska VV, Lahiri A, Sourabh P. Castes and Labor Mobility. 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1669164 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.1669164.
  7. Indian Human Develompent Survey. Retrieved March 3rd, 2014. 2005. http://www.ihds.umd.edu/.
  8. Madheswaran S, Attewell P. Caste Discrimination in the Indian Urban Labour Market: Evidence from the National Sample Survey. Economic and Political Weekly 42.41. 2007;4146–153. JSTOR. Web. 25 Mar. 2014. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/40276549?ref=search-gateway:bf1c7628e301541a1f3544f9812cc075>.
  9. Milliken FJ, Martins LL. Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Acad Manag Rev. 1996;21:402–33.Google Scholar
  10. Prakash D. The impact of employment quotas on the economic lives of disadvantaged minorities in India. Dartmouth College: IZA & CReAM; 2009.Google Scholar
  11. Takahiro Z. Caste discrimination and transaction costs in the labor market: evidence from rural North India. J Dev Econ. 2007;88:292–300.Google Scholar
  12. Thorat S, Aryama, and Prashant N. Reservation and Private Sector: Quest for Equal Opportunity and Growth. Jaipur: Rawat Publications Indian Institute of Dalit Studies, New Delhi. 2005. Print.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolaus Axmann
    • 1
  • Kendal Swanson
    • 1
  • Victor Cuspinera Contreras
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations