Advertisement

The Review of Black Political Economy

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 21–34 | Cite as

The Spillover Effect of Race on Police Expenditures: An Alternative Test of the Minority Threat Hypothesis

  • Olugbenga Ajilore
Article

Abstract

This paper implements a novel application of spatial econometrics to test the minority threat hypothesis by estimating the relationship and potential spillovers between race and police expenditures. This paper uses a strategic interaction framework to describe the mechanism that may drive expenditure spillovers as well as demographic spillovers. Estimating a Spatial Durbin Model (SDM), the findings of this study show counties with more residential segregation and are more conservative exhibit positive spillovers on neighboring county police expenditures. This paper makes a contribution by showing the effects of greater minority threat is not limited within geographic boundaries.

Keywords

Minority threat Police spending Spatial spillovers 

References

  1. Ajilore O, Smith J. Ethnic fragmentation and police spending. Appl Econ Lett. 2011;18(4):329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina A, Baqir R, Easterly W. Public goods and ethnic divisions. Q J Econ. 1999;114(4):1243–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baicker K. The spillover effects of state spending. J Public Econ. 2005;89(2–3):529–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergstrom T, Goodman R. Private demands for public goods. Am Econ Rev. 1973;63:280–96.Google Scholar
  5. Besley T, Case A. Does electoral accountability affect economic policy choices? Evidence from gubernatorial term limits. Q J Econ. 1995;110(3):769–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borcherding T, Deacon R. The demand for the services of non-federal governments. Am Econ Rev. 1972;62:891–901.Google Scholar
  7. Brueckner JK. Welfare reform and the race to the bottom: theory and evidence. South Econ J. 2000;66(3):505–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brueckner JK, Saavedra LA. Do local governments engage in strategic property tax competition? Natl Tax J. 2001;54(3):231–53.Google Scholar
  9. Case AC, Rosen HS, Hines Jr JR. Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: evidence from the states. J Public Econ. 1993;52(3):285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutler DM, Elmendorf DW, Zeckhauser RJ. Demographic characteristics and the public bundle. NBER Working Paper No. w4283. 1993.Google Scholar
  11. Eitle D, Taylor J. Are Hispanics the new ‘threat’? Minority group threat and fear of crime in Miami-Dade County. Soc Sci Res. 2008;37(4):1102–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elhorst JP, Freret S. Evidence of political yardstick competition in France using a two-regime spatial Durbin model with fixed effects. J Reg Sci. 2009;49(5):931–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hipp J. The role of crime in racial/ethnic transition. Criminology. 2010;48(3):683–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hipp J, Tita GE, Greenbaum RT. Drive-bys and trade-ups: examining the directionality of the crime and residential instability relationship. Social Forces. 2009;87(4):1778–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holmes MD et al. Minority threat, crime control, and police resource allocation in the Southwestern United States. Crime Delinquency. 2008;54(1):128–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson PI Minority group threat, crime, and policing: Social context and social control. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group; 1989.Google Scholar
  17. Kelejian HH, Robinson DP. A suggested method of estimation for spatially interdependent models with autocorrelated errors, and an application to a county expenditure model. Pap Reg Sci. 1993;72(3):297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kent SL, Carmichael JT. Racial residential segregation and social control: a panel study of the variation in police strength across US cities, 1980–2010. Am J Criminal Justice. 2014;39(2):228–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee L-f, Jihai Y. Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. J Econ. 2010;154(2):165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. LeSage JP. What regional scientists need to know about spatial econometrics. Rev Reg Stud. 2014;44(1):13–32.Google Scholar
  21. LeSage JP, Dominguez M. The importance of modeling spatial spillovers in public choice analysis. Public Choice. 2012;150(3–4):525–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lesage J, Pace RK. Introduction to spatial econometrics. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marlow ML, Shiers AF. Do law enforcement expenditures crowd-out public education expenditures? Appl Econ. 1999;31(2):255–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Montalvo J-G, Reynol-Querol M. Polarization, ethnic conflict, and growth. UPF Economics and Business Working Paper No. 660. 2002.Google Scholar
  25. Murdoch JC, Rahmatian M, Thayer MA. A spatially autoregressive median voter model of recreation expenditures. Public Finance Rev. 1993;21(3):334–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pickett JT et al. Reconsidering the relationship between perceived neighborhood racial composition and whites’ perceptions of victimization risk: do racial stereotypes matter? Criminology. 2012;50(1):145–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poterba JM. Demographic structure and the political economy of public education. J Policy Analysis Manag. 1997;16(1):48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Putnam RD. E pluribus unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2007;30(2):137–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reardon SF, Firebaugh G. Measures of multigroup segregation. Sociological Methodology, 2002. 33–67.Google Scholar
  30. Revelli F. Reaction or interaction? Spatial process identification in multi-tiered government structures. J Urban Econ. 2003;53(1):29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rincke J. A commuting based refinement of the contiguity matrix for spatial models, and an application to local police expenditures. Reg Sci Urban Econ. 2010;40:324–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rios M, Romero F, Ramirez R. Race reporting among Hispanics: 2010. Washington: Population Division: U.S. Census Bureau; 2014.Google Scholar
  33. Rothwell JT, Massey DS. Density zoning and class segregation in US metropolitan areas. Soc Sci Q. 2010;91(5):1123–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruddell R, Thomas MO. Minority threat and police strength: an examination of the Golden State. Police Pract Res Int J. 2010;11(3):256–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sever B. The relationship between minority populations and police force strength. Policy Quarterly. 2001;4(1):28–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tiebout C. A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ. 1956;64:416–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tita GE, Greenbaum RT. Crime, neighborhoods, and units of analysis: putting space in its place. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma GJ, editors. Putting crime in its place. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 145–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turnbull GK, Djoundourian SS. The median voter hypothesis: evidence from general purpose local governments. Public Choice. 1994;81(3–4):223–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xie M, McDowall D. The reproduction of racial inequality: how crime affects housing turnover. Criminology. 2010;48(3):865–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ToledoToledoUSA

Personalised recommendations