The Review of Black Political Economy

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 25–60 | Cite as

Interracial Marriage, Migration and Loving



The United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Loving v. Virginia in 1967, which forced 16 Southern states to strike down their anti-miscegenation laws, creates a unique opportunity to explore the impact of an exogenous change in a state’s laws regulating interracial marriages. This study investigates the relationship between anti-miscegenation laws, black/white interracial marriage and black Americans’ geographical distribution using three decades of the U.S. census data. The results suggest that the timing and voluntary/involuntary repeal of statutes banning black/white interracial marriages impacted the locational distribution of married black males. The relationship is less clear-cut for black females. However, length of exposure to anti-miscegenation laws is found to be related to the geographical sorting patterns of both black males and females. A few patterns in the data suggest that social norms and local culture may be influential in this relationship and the findings imply that unless a society is ready to change, the government cannot fully offset the negative impact of past bans and punishments.


Interracial marriage Migration Anti-miscegenation laws U.S. Supreme Court 

JEL Classifications

J12 J15 



I am very grateful to Daniel S. Hamermesh, Steve J. Trejo, Gerald S. Oettinger, and Z. Eylem Gevrek for their continued support. I would like to thank Darrick Hamilton, seminar participants at the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Konstanz, and conference participants at the Society of Labor Economists annual meeting and the American Economic Association annual meeting for helpful comments. This is a revised version of the paper circulated under the title “Migration and Loving”. Thanks to Daniel S. Hamermesh and Anne Marie Jennings for their editorial assistance.


  1. Arias E. United States life tables, 2000. National vital statistics reports; vol 51 no 3. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Batson CD, Qian Z, Lichter DT. Interracial and intraracial patterns of mate selection among America’s diverse black populations. J Marriage Fam. 2006;68(3):658–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bontemps A, Conroy J. Anyplace but here. New York: Hill & Wang; 1966.Google Scholar
  4. Browning JR. Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States. Duke Bar J. 1951;1(1):26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charles KK, Luoh MC. Male incarceration, the marriage market and female outcomes. Rev Econ Stat. 2010;92(3):614-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins WJ. When the tide turned: immigration and the delay of the Great Black Migration. J Econ Hist. 1997;57(03):607–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins WJ, Margo RA. Residential segregation and socioeconomic outcomes: when did ghettos go bad? Econ Lett. 2000;69(2):239–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. FindLaw: Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1; 1967.Google Scholar
  9. Fligstein N. Going North: migration of blacks and whites from the South, 1900–1950. New York: Academic; 1981.Google Scholar
  10. Friedberg L. Did unilateral divorce raise divorce rates? Evidence from panel data. Am Econ Rev. 1998;83(3):608–27.Google Scholar
  11. Fryer RG. Guess who’s been coming to dinner? Trends in interracial marriage over the 20th century. J Econ Perspect. 2007;21(2):71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fu VK, Wolfinger NH. Broken boundaries or broken marriages? Racial intermarriage and divorce in the United States. Soc Sci Q. 2011;92(4):1096–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gates JG. How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender? 2011.Google Scholar
  14. Gibson C, Jung K. 2006. Historical census statistics on the foreign born population of the United States: 1850 to 2000. Working Paper Series no. 81: Table 8. 2006. Accessed 14 Aug 2013.
  15. Goodwin EM. 1990. Black migration in America from 1915 to 1960: an uneasy Exodus. E. Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grieco EM. Race and Hispanic origin of the foreign-born population in the United States: 2007. American Community Survey Reports, no. 11: Figure 3. 2010. Accessed 14 Aug 2013.
  17. Grossman JR. Land of hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration. Chicago: University Chicago Press; 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guryan J. Desegregation and black dropout rates. Am Econ Rev. 2004;94(4):919–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamermesh DS. (Jones, M., Producer). The economics of Prop 8. 2011. Available at:
  20. Johnson GN. We’ve heard this before: the legacy of interracial marriage bans and the implications for today’s marriage equality debates. Vermont Law Review. Fall, Vermont Law School Research Paper No. 09-18. 2009.Google Scholar
  21. Kalmijn M. Trends in black/white intermarriage. Soc Forces 1993;72(1):119–46.Google Scholar
  22. Lemann N. The promised land: the Great Migration and how it changed America. New York: Knopf; 1991.Google Scholar
  23. Marks C. Farewell-we’re good and gone: the Great Black Migration. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1989.Google Scholar
  24. Newbeck P. Virginia hasn’t always been for lovers: interracial marriage bans and the case of Richard and Mildred loving. Urbana: Southern Illinois University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  25. Qian Z. Who intermarries? Education, nativity, region, and interracial marriage, 1980 and 1990. Soc Sci Res. 1999;33:225–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Qian Z, Lichter DT. Changing patterns of interracial marriage in a multiracial society. J Marriage Fam. 2011;73(5):1065–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rastogi S, Johnson TD, Hoeffel EM, Drewery MP Jr. 2010. The Black Population: 2010, U.S. Census Bureau, Census Briefs, C2010BR-06, available at
  28. Rosenfeld MJ, Byung-Soo K. The independence of young adults and the rise of interracial and same-sex unions. Am Sociol Rev. 2005;70(4):541–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruggles S, Sobek M, Alexander T, Fitch CA, Goeken R, Hall PK, King M, Ronnander C. Integrated public use microdata series: version 3.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center [producer and distributor]; 2004.Google Scholar
  30. Smith DM, Gates GJ. Gay and lesbian families in the U.S.: same-sex unmarried partner households. The Urban Institute; 2001.Google Scholar
  31. Tolnay SE. The African American great migration and beyond. Annu Rev Sociol. 2003;29:209–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tolnay SE, Beck M. Racial violence and blackmigration in the American South, 1910 to 1930. Am Sociol Rev. 1992;57(1):103–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tolnay SE, Crowder KD, Adelman RM. Race, regional origin, and residence in Northern Cities at the beginning of the great migration. Am Sociol Rev. 2002;67(3):456–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trotter JW. The great migration in historical perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  35. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Table 60. Married couples by race and Hispanic origin of spouses, 15 Dec. 2010. Accessed 14 Aug 2013.
  36. Wallenstein P. Blue laws and black codes: conflict, courts, and change in twentieth-century Virginia. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press; 2004Google Scholar
  37. Witeck B. Over half of all Americans favor national recognition for same-sex marriages. 2011. Available at
  38. Wooldridge J. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  39. Wong LY. Why do only 5.5 % of black men marry white women?. Int Econ Rev. 2003a;44(3):803–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wong LY. Structural estimation of marriage models. J Labor Econ. 2003b;21(3):699–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas A&M University-Corpus ChristiCorpus ChristiUSA
  2. 2.IZA-Institute for the Study of LaborBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations