The Review of Black Political Economy

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 163–180 | Cite as

Hurricane Katrina: Was There a Political Economy of Death?

Article

Abstract

An empirical implication of egalitarianism in the provision of public disaster relief services is that the probability of surviving a natural disaster should not be conditioned on a household’s position in the income distribution, or its racial characteristics. In this paper, we utilize data on deaths attributed to Hurricane Katrina in the City of New Orleans to estimate a political economy model of the public provision of disaster rescue services. Parameter estimates reveal that the probability of dying as a result of Hurricane Katrina, at both the census tract and individual level, increased with respect to being black and poor. Our results suggest that there was a departure from egalitarian principles in the provision of public disaster rescue services during Hurricane Katrina, and are consistent with a political economy of race and class governing decisions about the allocation of public resources to ameliorate population environmental risks.

Keywords

Egalitarianism Political economy Hurricane Katrina 

References

  1. Alesina A, Glaeser E, Sacerdote B. Why doesn’t the United States have a European-style welfare state? Brookings Pap Econ Act. 2001;2:187–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anbarci N, Escaleras M, Register CA. Earthquake fatalities: the interaction of nature and political economy. J Publ Econ. 2005;89:1907–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baugh J. It aint about race: some lingering (linquistic) consequences of the African slave trade and their relevance to your personal historical hardship index. Du Bois Rev. 2006;3:145–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besley T, Burgess R. The political economy of government responsiveness. Rev Econ Stat. 2002;117:1415–52.Google Scholar
  5. Cleves MA, Gould WW, Gutierrez RG. An introduction to survival analysis using STATA. Revised ed. College Station, Texas: Stata Press, STATA Corp; 2004.Google Scholar
  6. Darity W Jr. Stratification economics: the role of intergroup inequality. J Econ Finance. 2005;29:144–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Souza Briggs X. After Katrina: rebuilding lives and places. City Commun. 2006;5:119–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deaton A, Muellbauer J. Economics and consumer behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1980.Google Scholar
  9. Draut T. Testimony before the United States senate commmittee on banking, housing and urban affairs. In: Examining the billing, marketing, and disclosure practices of the credit card industry and their impact on consumers. Hearing. http://banking.senate.gov/_files/draut.pdf. Accessed 25 January 2007.
  10. Famoye F. Restricted generalized poisson regression model. Commun Stat, Theory Methods. 1993;22:1335–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Famoye F, Singh KP. Zero-inflated generalized poisson regression model with an application to domestic violence data. J Data Sci. 2006;4:117–30.Google Scholar
  12. Garrett T, Sobel R. The political economy of FEMA disaster payments. Econ Inq. 2003;41:496–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greene WH. Econometric analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2003.Google Scholar
  14. Horwich G. Disasters and market response. Cato J. 1990;9:531–5.Google Scholar
  15. Horwich G. Economic lessons from the Kobe earthquake. Econ Dev Cult Change. 2000;48:521–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahn ME. The death toll from natural disasters: the role of income, geography, and institutions. Rev Econ Stat. 2005;87:271–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiefer NM. Economic duration data and hazard functions. J Econ Lit. 1988:26:646–79.Google Scholar
  18. Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals. Vital statistics of all bodies at St. Gabriel Morgue. www.dhh.louisiana.gov/reports.asp. Accessed 23 February 2006.
  19. McFadden D. The measurement of urban travel demand. J Public Econ. 1974;3:303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sharkey P. Survival and death in New Orleans: an empirical look at the human impact of Katrina. J Black Stud. 2007;37:482–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Simerman J, Ott D, Melnick T. Assumptions about Katrina victims may be incorrect. Knight Ridder Newspapers; December 29, 2005.Google Scholar
  22. Toya H, Skidmore M. Economic development and the impacts of natural disasters. Econ Lett. 2007;94:20–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. United States Government Printing Office. Hurricane Katrina: a nation still unprepared. Special Report of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (S. Rept. 109–322), United States Senate. origin.www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/ (2006).
  24. Van den Berg JG. Duration models: specification, identification, and multiple durations. In: Heckman JJ, Leamer E, editors. Handbook of econometrics, vol. 5, chapter 55. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland; 2001.Google Scholar
  25. Wienke A. Frailty models. MPIDR Working Paper WP 2003 - 032. Rostock Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research; 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsMorehouse CollegeAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations