Skip to main content
Log in

Apriorism, Introspection, and the Axiom of Action: A Realist Solution

  • Articles
  • Published:
The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1961. Commentary on the Metaphysics of Aristotle. Trans. John P. Rowan. Library of Living Catholic Thought. Vol. 1. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1964a. Existence and Nature of God. Vol. 2 of Summa Theologiae. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1964b. Knowledge in God. Vol. 4 of Summa Theologiae. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, Raymond. [1938] 1987. La philosophie critique de l’histoire. Ed. Sylvie Mesure. Paris: Julliard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bréhier, Emile. [1964] 1994. Histoire de la philosophie. III/XIX–XX siècle. Coll. Quadridge. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daujat, Jean. 1974. Y a-t-il une vérité ? Les grandes réponses de la philosophie. Paris: Tequi.

  • Gadamer, Hans-Goerg. [1963] 1987. “Die phänomenologische Bewegung.” In Gesammelte Werke. Vol. 3, Neuere Philosophie I: Hegel-Husserl-Heidegger. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

  • Garrison, Roger. 1986. “From Lachmann to Lucas: On Institutions, Expectations and Equilibrating Tendencies.” In Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding: Essays in Honor of Ludwig M. Lachmann on his Eightieth Birthday. Ed. I. Kirzner. New York: New York University Press. Pp. 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. 1994. La présomption fatale. Les erreurs du socialisme. Trad. Raoul Audouin and Guy Millière. Coll. Libre échange. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1995. Economic Science and the Austrian Method. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. 1991. “Austrian Rationalism in the Age of the Decline of Positivism.” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 2 (2/3): 243–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isambert, F-A. 1989. “Alfred Schütz, entre Weber et Husserl.:” Revue Française de Sociologie 30 (2): 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanrond, Werner G. 1995. Introduction à l’herméneutique théologique. Développement et signification. Trans. Pierre-Loup Lesaffre. Collection Cogitato fidei. Paris: Les Editions du cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, Israel. 1992. The Meaning of Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, Israel. 1976. “On the Method of Austrian Economics.” In The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Ed. Edwin G. Dolan. Kansas City, Mo.: Sheed and Ward. Pp. 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, Roger. 1994a. “Ideal Type Methodology in Economics.” In The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Ed. Peter J. Boettke. Aldershot, U.K.; Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, Roger. 1994b. “Lachmann on Schütz and Shackle.” In Advances in Austrian Economics. Vol 1. Ed. Peter J. Boettke, Israel M. Kirzner, and Mario J. Rizzo. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press. Pp. 289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter. 2001. “On Rationality, Ideal Types and Economics: Alfred Schütz and the Austrian School.” Review of Austrian Economics 14 (2/3): 119–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, Ludwig. 1982. “Ludwig von Mises and the Extension of Subjectivism.” In Method, Process and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises. Ed. Israel M. Kirzner. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books. Pp. 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, Ludwig. 1978. “An Austrian Stocktaking Unsettled Questions and Tentative Answers.” In New Directions in Austrian Economics. Ed. Louis M. Spadaro. Kansas City, Mo.: Sheed Andrews and McMeel. Pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, Ludwig. 1976. “On the Central Concept of Austrian Economics: Market Process.” In The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Ed. Edwin G. Dolan. Kansas City, Mo.: Sheed and Ward. Pp. 126–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, Ludwig. 1971. The Legacy of Karl Weber. Berkeley, Calif.: Glendessary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, Don. 1994. “The Interpretive Turn.” In The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Ed. Peter J. Boettke. Aldershot, U.K.: Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, Don, ed. 1990. Economics and Hermeneutics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, Don. 1986. “Euclideanism versus Hermeneutics: A Reinterpretation of Misesian Apriorism.” In Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding. Ed. Israel M. Kirzner. London: Macmillan. Pp. 192–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäki, Uskali. 1997. “Universals and the Methodenstreit: A Reexamination of Carl Menger’s Conception of Economics as an Exact Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 28 (3): 475–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäki, Uskali. 1990. “Mengerian Economics in Realist Perspective.” In Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics. Ed. Bruce Caldwell. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy 20: 289–310.

  • Maritain, Jacques 1924. Réflexions sur l’intelligence et sur sa vie propre. Paris: Nouvelle Librairie Nationale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1962. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, Joseph. 1976. De la connaissance selon S. Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Beauchesne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippe, D. 1991. Lettre à un ami. Itinéraire philosophique. Paris: Éditions Universitaires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippe, M.D. 1990. Lettre à un ami: Itinéraire philosophique. Paris: Editions Universitaires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund. 1968. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson. French translation by Nicole Thyssen-Rutten and Philippe Devaux. La logique de la découverte scientifique Paris: Payot édition, 1985.

  • Prendergast, Christopher. 1986. “Alfred Schütz and the Austrian School of Economics.” American Journal of Sociology 92 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prychitko, David L. 1994. “Ludwig von Lachmann and the Interpretative Turn in Economics: A Critical Inquiry into the Hermeneutics of the Plan.” In Advances in Austrian Economics. Vol 1. Ed. Peter J. Boettke, Israel M. Kirzner, and Mario J. Rizzo. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press. Pp. 303–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynaud, Philippe. [1987] 1996. Max Weber et les dilemmes de la raison moderne. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rector, R.A. 1990. “The Economics of Rationality and the Rationality of Economics.” In Economics and Hermeneutics. Ed. D. Lavoie. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, Murray N. 1957. “In Defense of ‘Extreme A priorism’.” Southern Economic Journal 23(3): 314–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston Ill.: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, Alfred, and T. Luckman. 1973. The Structures of the Life World. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selgin, George A. 1987. “Praxeology and Understanding: An Analysis of the Controversy in Austrian Economics.” Review of Austrian Economics 2: 19–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Yves. 1944. Prévoir et savoir: études sur l’idée de la nécessité dans la pensée scientifique et en philosophie. Montréal: Editions de l’Arbre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux, Roger. 1959. Epistémologie générale ou critique de la connaissance. Paris: Beauchesne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. [1949] 1968. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Ed. and trans. by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. New York: New York Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1992. Essais sur la théorie de la science. Trad. Julien Freund. Collection Agora 116. Paris: Presses Pocket. First published 1965 by Plon.

  • Witt, Ulrich. 1990. “Le subjectivisme en sciences économiques, proposition de réorientation.” Journal des économistes et des études humaines 1 (2): 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Facchini.

Additional information

François Facchini is an associate researcher at the University of Paris 1, CES-MATISSE (France).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Facchini, F. Apriorism, Introspection, and the Axiom of Action: A Realist Solution. Quart J Austrian Econ 10, 234–249 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-007-9022-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-007-9022-2

Keywords

Navigation