Austrian Economics and the Market Test Reexamined

  • Daniel Sutter


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aeppel, Timothy. 2005. “Economists Gain Star Power.” Wall Street Journal (22 February): A2.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, William L. 2000. “Austrian Economics and the ‘Market Test’: A Comment on Laband and Tollison.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (3): 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur, W. Brian. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events.” Economic Journal 99: 116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Block, Walter. 2000. “Austrian Journals: A Critique of Rosen, Yeager, Laband and Tollison, and Vedder and Gallaway.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (2): 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boettke, Peter J., ed. 1994. The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Boettke, Peter J., and David L. Prychitko. 1994. “The Future of Austrian Economics.” In The Market Process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics. Boettke and Prychitko, eds. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar. Pp. 287–93.Google Scholar
  7. Caplan, Bryan. 1999. “The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations.” Southern Economic Journal 65 (4): 823–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cowen, Tyler, and Richard Fink. 1985. “Inconsistent Equilibrium Constructs: The Evenly Rotating Economy of Mises and Rothbard.” American Economic Review 75 (4): 866–69.Google Scholar
  9. David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75: 332–37.Google Scholar
  10. Hayek, Friedrich A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Huber, Peter W. 1991. Galileo’s Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Laband, David N., and Robert D. Tollison. 2000. “On Secondhandism and Scientific Appraisal.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (1): 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liebowitz, Stan J., and Stephen E. Margolis. 1999. Winners, Losers & Microsoft: Competition and Antitrust in High Technology. Oakland, Calif.: The Independent Institute.Google Scholar
  14. ___. 1990. “The Fable of the Keys.” Journal of Law and Economics 33: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosen, Sherwin. 1997. “Austrian and Neoclassical Economics: Any Gains From Trade?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (4): 139–52.Google Scholar
  16. Stigler, George J., and Gary S. Becker. 1977. “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum.” American Economic Review 67 (2): 76–90.Google Scholar
  17. Sykes, Charles J. 1988. Profscam: Professors and the Demise of Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Press.Google Scholar
  18. Vedder, Richard, and Lowell Gallaway. 2000. “The Austrian Market Share in the Marketplace for Ideas, 1871–2025.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (1): 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yeager, Leland B. 2000. “The Tactics of Secondhandism.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (3): 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ___. 1997. “Austrian Economics, Neoclassicism, and the Market Test.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (4): 153–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science & Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Sutter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TexasEdinburgUSA

Personalised recommendations