Skip to main content
Log in

Austrian Economics and the Market Test Reexamined

  • Published:
The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aeppel, Timothy. 2005. “Economists Gain Star Power.” Wall Street Journal (22 February): A2.

  • Anderson, William L. 2000. “Austrian Economics and the ‘Market Test’: A Comment on Laband and Tollison.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (3): 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. Brian. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events.” Economic Journal 99: 116–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, Walter. 2000. “Austrian Journals: A Critique of Rosen, Yeager, Laband and Tollison, and Vedder and Gallaway.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (2): 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, Peter J., ed. 1994. The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, Peter J., and David L. Prychitko. 1994. “The Future of Austrian Economics.” In The Market Process: Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics. Boettke and Prychitko, eds. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar. Pp. 287–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, Bryan. 1999. “The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations.” Southern Economic Journal 65 (4): 823–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, Tyler, and Richard Fink. 1985. “Inconsistent Equilibrium Constructs: The Evenly Rotating Economy of Mises and Rothbard.” American Economic Review 75 (4): 866–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75: 332–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Peter W. 1991. Galileo’s Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laband, David N., and Robert D. Tollison. 2000. “On Secondhandism and Scientific Appraisal.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (1): 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, Stan J., and Stephen E. Margolis. 1999. Winners, Losers & Microsoft: Competition and Antitrust in High Technology. Oakland, Calif.: The Independent Institute.

  • ___. 1990. “The Fable of the Keys.” Journal of Law and Economics 33: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Sherwin. 1997. “Austrian and Neoclassical Economics: Any Gains From Trade?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (4): 139–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J., and Gary S. Becker. 1977. “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum.” American Economic Review 67 (2): 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, Charles J. 1988. Profscam: Professors and the Demise of Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, Richard, and Lowell Gallaway. 2000. “The Austrian Market Share in the Marketplace for Ideas, 1871–2025.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (1): 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, Leland B. 2000. “The Tactics of Secondhandism.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 3 (3): 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ___. 1997. “Austrian Economics, Neoclassicism, and the Market Test.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (4): 153–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Daniel Sutter is associate professor of economics at the University of Texas, Pan American. The author would like to thank Bill Anderson, Tyler Cowen, and two referees for comments on an earlier draft and Jie Shaui for valuable research assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sutter, D. Austrian Economics and the Market Test Reexamined. Quart J Austrian Econ 10, 49–62 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-007-9003-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-007-9003-5

Keywords

Navigation