Black Intimacies Matter: the Role of Family Status, Gender, and Cumulative Risk on Relationship Quality Among Black Parents

Abstract

Studies show that married families report higher levels of relationship quality relative to unmarried families; yet, limited attention has been given to differences in relationship quality between married and unmarried Black families. The authors examined the interplay between family status, gender, and cumulative risk exposure on relationship quality among Black parents. The results suggest that (a) differences between married and unmarried parents only emerged on two measures of relationship quality, (b) married mothers report higher levels of cohesiveness and lower levels of distress compared to married fathers and unmarried parents; (c) cumulative risk exposure was associated with each relationship quality measure; (d) cumulative risk mediated differences in relationship quality between married and unmarried mothers but not for married and unmarried fathers; and (e) cumulative risk exposure moderated the association between family status and gender whereby the effect of cumulative risk on relationship quality was more detrimental for married mothers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Adelmann, P. K., Chadwick, K., & Baerger, D. R. (1996). Marital quality of Black and White adults over the life course. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(3), 361–384.

  2. Benson, M. L., Fox, G. L., DeMaris, A., & Van Wyk, J. (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage, individual economic distress and violence against women in intimate relationships. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(3), 207–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Billingsley, A. (1994). Climbing Jacob’s ladder: the enduring legacies of African-American families. Simon and Schuster.

  4. Booth, A., & Johnson, D. (1988). Premarital cohabitation and marital success. Journal of Family Issues, 9(2), 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Booth, A., Johnson, D., & Edwards, J. N. (1983). Measuring marital stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45(2), 387–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Broman, C. L. (1993). Race differences in marital well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(3), 724–732.

  7. Broman, C. L. (2005). Marital quality in Black and White marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 26(4), 431–441.

  8. Brown, S. L. (2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: the significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 833–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bryant, C. M., Taylor, R. J., Lincoln, K. D., Chatters, L. M., & Jackson, J. S. (2008). Marital satisfaction among African Americans and Black Caribbeans: findings from the National Survey of American Life. Family Relations, 57(2), 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bryant, C. M., Wickrama, K. A. S., Bolland, J., Bryant, B. M., Cutrona, C. E., & Stanik, C. E. (2010). Race matters, even in marriage: identifying factors linked to marital outcomes for African Americans. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(3), 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bulanda, J. R., & Brown, S. L. (2007). Race-ethnic differences in marital quality and divorce. Social Science Research, 36(3), 945–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carlson, Marcia J. and Alicia G. VanOrman. (2017). Trajectories of relationship supportiveness after childbirth: does marriage matter? Social Science Research.

  13. Chaney, C., Mitchell, K. S., & Barker, K. A. (2014). Does engagement matter? Marital intentions and relationship quality among cohabiting African Americans. Marriage & Family Review, 50(7), 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cherlin, A. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: a review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cherlin, A. J. (2005). American marriage in the early twenty-first century. The Future of Children, 15(2), 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Collins, P. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.

  17. Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., & Martin, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 685–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. U Chi Legal F, 139.

  19. Cruz, J. (2013). Marriage: more than a century of change. National Center for Family & Marriage Research.

  20. Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical race theory: an introduction. NYU Press.

  21. DeMaris, A., Benson, M. L., Fox, G. L., Hill, T., & Van Wyk, J. (2003). Distal and proximal factors in domestic violence: a test of an integrated model. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 652–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Franke, K. M. (1999). Becoming a citizen: reconstruction era regulation of African American marriages. Yale JL & Human. 11:251.

  23. Goldberg, J. S., & Carlson, M. J. (2014). Parents’ relationship quality and children’s behavior in stable married and cohabiting families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(4), 762–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hill, S. A. (2006). Marriage among African American women: a gender perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 421–440.

  25. Hunter, T. (2017). Bound in wedlock: slave and free black marriage in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Koball, H. L., Moiduddin, E., Henderson, J., Goesling, B., and Besculides, M. (2010). What do we know about the link between marriage and health? Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.

  28. Lenhardt, R. A. (2014). Marriage as black citizenship. Hastings LJ, 66, 1317.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lichter, D. T., Sassler, S., & Turner, R. N. (2014). Cohabitation, post-conception unions, and the rise in nonmarital fertility. Social Science Research, 47, 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Manning, W. D., & Brown, S. (2006). Children’s economic well-being in married and cohabiting parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(2), 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martinez, G., Daniels, K., & Chandra, A. (2012). Fertility of men and women aged 15-44 years in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010. National Health Statistics Reports, 51(1).

  32. Mathiesen, K. S., & Tambs, K. (1999). The EAS Temperament Questionnaire—factor structure, age trends, reliability, and stability in a Norwegian sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(3), 431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McLanahan, S. S. (2006). Fragile families and the marriage agenda. NY: Springer.

  34. Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rauer, A. J., Karney, B. R., Garvan, C. W., & Hou, W. (2008). Relationship risks in context: a cumulative risk approach to understanding relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(5), 1122–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Reichman, N. E., Teitler, J. O., Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. S. (2001). Fragile families: sample and design. Children and Youth Services Review, 23(4/5), 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rosenfeld, M. J. (2018). Who wants the breakup? Gender and breakup in heterosexual couples. Pp. 221–243 in Social Networks and the Life Course. Springer.

  38. Sanchez, L., Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (1998). Sex-specialized or collaborative mate selection? Union transitions among cohabitors. Social Science Research, 27(3), 280–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Turney, K. (2015). Hopelessly devoted? Relationship quality during and after incarceration. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(2), 480–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Williams, D. T., & Cheadle, J. E. (2016). Economic hardship, parents’ depression, and relationship distress among couples with young children. Society and Mental Health, 6(2), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Williams, D. T., Cheadle, J. E., & Goosby, B. J. (2013). Hard times and heart break linking economic hardship and relationship distress. Journal of Family Issues.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank a consortium of private foundations for their support of the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01HD36916, R01HD39135, and R01HD40421, as well as a consortium of private foundations. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deadric T. Williams.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, D.T., Simon, L. & Cardwell, M. Black Intimacies Matter: the Role of Family Status, Gender, and Cumulative Risk on Relationship Quality Among Black Parents. J Afr Am St 23, 1–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-019-09420-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Black parents
  • Cumulative risk
  • Family status
  • Gender
  • Intersectionality