Advertisement

Journal of African American Studies

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 315–323 | Cite as

Utility of the Beck Anxiety Inventory Among Ghanaians: a Preliminary Study

  • Kofi KrafonaEmail author
ARTICLES
  • 215 Downloads

Abstract

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a well-known clinical tool for screening anxiety. A number of researches has indicated its utility in a wide range of client groups including adolescents and people with intellectual disability. Its use among predominantly black population in a non-western world, however, is not well-documented. The study set out to examine its psychometric properties among undergraduate students in Ghana. There were 133 participants consisting of 86 males and 47 females with a mean age of 23.83 years (SD = 3.21) who volunteered. The results showed that the full scale mean score was 17.65 (SD = 12.72) with no significant difference between the males and females (t (131) = .05, p > .05, two-tailed). The Cronbach coefficient alpha was .93. The four-factor structure was not supported, instead a three-factor structure consisting of autonomic, somatic, and fear/panic elements was revealed. The correlations between the factors were moderate ranging from .51 to .65. In general, the BAI may be potentially useful as a research tool in Ghana. A number of limitations have been pointed out and future work is required to establish its research and clinical utility in Ghana.

Keywords

Anxiety Beck Anxiety Inventory Predominantly black population 

References

  1. Armstrong, K. A., & Khawaja, N. G. (2002). Gender differences in anxiety: an investigation of the symptoms, cognitions, and sensitivity towards anxiety in a nonclinical population. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 30, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1993). Manual for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman, L. K., & Stegger, M. F. (2008). Race and religion: Differential prediction of anxiety symptoms by religious coping in African American and European American young adults. Depression and Anxiety, 1–7.Google Scholar
  5. Chapman, K. L., Williams, S. R., Mast, B. T., & Woodruff-Bordern, J. (2009). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Beck Anxiety Inventory in African-American and European young adults. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Contreras, S., Fernandez, S., Malcarne, V. L., Ingram, R. E., & Vaccarino, V. R. (2004). Reliability and validity of the Beck depression and anxiety inventories in Caucasian Americans and Latinos. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 26(4), 446–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costello, A. B, Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), Available online: http://paronline.net/getyn.aspiv=10&n=7
  8. Creamer, M., Foran, J., & Bell, R. (1995). The Beck Anxiety Inventory in a nonclinical sample. Behavior Research and Therapy, 33(4), 477–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fydrich, T., Dowdall, D., & Chambless, D. L. (1992). Reliability and validity of the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hewitt, P. L., & Norton, G. R. (1993). The Beck Anxiety Inventory: a psychometric analysis. Psychological Assessment, 5(4), 408–412.Google Scholar
  11. Kabacoff, R. I., Segal, D. L., Hersen, M., Hasselt, V., & Vincent, B. (1997). Psychometric properties and diagnostic utility of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory with older adult psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2(1), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar, G., Steer, R. A., & Beck, A. T. (1993). Factor structure of the Beck Anxiety Inventory with adolescent psychiatry inpatients. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 6, 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morin, C. M., Landreville, P., Colecchi, C., McDonald, K., Jackie, S., & William, L. (1999). The Beck Anxiety Inventory: psychometric properties with older adults. J Clin Geropsychol, 5, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Novy, D. M., Stanley, M. A., Averill, P., & Daza, P. (2001). Psychometric comparability of English and Spanish language measures of anxiety and related affective symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 13(3), 347–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Osman, A., Barrios, F. X., Aukes, D., Osman, J. R., & Markway, K. (1993). The Beck Anxiety Inventory: psychometric properties in a community population. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 15, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Osman, A., Kopper, B. A., Barrios, F. X., Osman, J. R., & Wade, T. (1997). The Beck Anxiety Inventory: reexamination of factor structure and psychometric properties. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Osman, A., Hoffman, J., Barrios, F. X., Kopper, B. A., Breitenstein, J. L., & Hahn, S. K. (2002). Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Beck Anxiety Inventory in adolescent psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(4), 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pillay, A. L., Edwards, S. D., Sargent, C., & Dhlomo, R. M. (2001). Anxiety among university students in South Africa. Psychological Reports, 88, 1182–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Steele, G. I., & Edwards, D. J. A. (2008). Development and validation of the Xhosa translations of the Beck Inventories: 2. item analysis, internal consistency, and factor analysis. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18(2), 217–226.Google Scholar
  22. Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Terre Blanche, M., & Durrheim, K. (1999). Research in practice: applied methods for the social sciences. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational FoundationsUniversity of Cape CoastCape CoastGhana

Personalised recommendations