Journal of African American Studies

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 290–307 | Cite as

Marital Well-Being Over Time Among Black and White Americans: The First Seven Years

  • Edna Brown
  • Terri L. Orbuch
  • José A. Bauermeister
  • Brandyn-Dior McKinley
ARTICLES

Abstract

We examined patterns of marital well-being over the first 7 years of marriage and whether factors connected to early marital well-being during year 1 impacted marital well-being over time. Data were collected as part of a longitudinal panel study following 199 Black American and 174 White American during the first 7 years of marriage. Multilevel growth curve modeling revealed that race, income, and premarital child affected husbands’ marital well-being in year 1. Education, wives’ employment status, and divorced parents influenced wives’ marital well-being at year 1. After accounting for differences in these early marital conditions, having a child before marriage was significant in predicting the rates of change over time for husbands. Divorced parents affected the rate of change in marital well-being for wives. The findings suggest that as couples settle into their marriages, risk factors have fewer consequences on marital well-being.

Keywords

Race Black Americans Gender Marriage Longitudinal research Marital well-being 

References

  1. Adelmann, P. K., Chadwick, K., & Baerger, D. R. (1996). Marital quality of Black and White adults over the life course. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 361–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R., & Cheadle, J. (2005). The long reach of divorce: divorce and child well being across three generations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amato, P. R., Johnson, D., Booth, A., & Rogers, S. J. (2003). Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks, R. (2011). Is marriage for white people?: How the African American marriage decline affects everyone. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  5. Bengston, V. L., & Allen, K. R. (1993). The life course perspective applied to families over time. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: a contextual approach. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  6. Bramlett, M. D., & Mosher, W. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States (Vital and Health Statistics, series 23, No. 22). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  7. Broman, C. L. (2005). Marital quality in Black and White marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, E., Orbuch, T., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2008). Religiosity and marital stability among Black American couples and White American couples. Family Relations, 57, 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bulanda, J. R. (2011). Gender, marital power, and marital quality in later life. Journal of Women & Aging, 23, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corra, M., Carter, S. K., Carter, J. S., & Knox, D. (2009). Trends in martial happiness by gender and race, 1973–2006. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1379–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Burton, L. (1996). Rethinking family development: critical conceptual issues in the study of diverse groups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dush, C. M., Cohan, C. L., & Amato, P. R. (2003). The relationship between cohabitation and marital quality and stability: change across cohorts? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furdyna, H., Tucker, B., & James, A. D. (2008). Relative spousal earnings and martial happiness among African American and White women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 332–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodwin, P. (2003). African American and European American women’s marital well being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heaton, T. B. (2002). Factors contributing to increasing marital stability in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 23(3), 392–409.Google Scholar
  16. Huston, T. L., Caughlin, J. P., Houts, R. M., Smith, S. E., & George, L. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1075–1092. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kreider, R., & Ellis, R. (2011). Number, timing and duration of marriages and divorce: 2009. Current Population Reports (pp. 70–125). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  20. Larson, J., & Holman, T. (1994). Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 43, 228–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lincoln, K. D., & Chae, D. H. (2010). Stress, marital satisfaction, and psychological distress among African Americans. Journal of Family Issues, 31(8), 1081–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orbuch, T. L., House, J. S., Mero, R. P., & Webster, P. S. (1996). Marital quality over the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J., Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will divorce? A 14-year longitudinal study of Black couples and White couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Payne, K. K., & Gibbs, L. (2011). Marital duration at divorce (FP-11-13). National Center for Family & Marriage Research. Retrieved from http://ncfmr.bgsu.edu/pdf/family_profiles/file104359.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2011.
  25. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Ruggles, S. (1997). The rise of divorce and separation in the United States, 1880–1990. Demography, 34, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SSI (Scientific Software International). (2005). Hierarchical linear models (version 6.01). Chicago: SSI Inc.Google Scholar
  28. Sweeney, M. M., & Phillips, J. A. (2006). Premarital cohabitation and marital disruption among White, Black, and Mexican American women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 296–314.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, R. J., Jackson, J. S., & Chatters, L. M. (1997). Family life in Black America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. U.S. Census Bureau National Center for Health Statistics (2007). Births, marriages, divorces, and deaths: provisional data for 2006, 55, 20, Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2009/cats/births_deaths_marriages_divorces.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2011.
  31. Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D., Chen, M. D., & Campbell, A. M. (2005). As good as it gets? A life course perspective on marital quality. Social Forces, 84, 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. VanLaningham, J., Johnson, D. R., & Amato, P. (2001). Marital happiness, marital duration, and the U-shaped curve: evidence from a five-wave panel study. Social Forces, 78, 1313–1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Veroff, J., Young, A., & Coon, H. (1997). The early years of marriage. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: theory, research and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 431–450). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edna Brown
    • 1
  • Terri L. Orbuch
    • 2
    • 3
  • José A. Bauermeister
    • 4
  • Brandyn-Dior McKinley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyOakland UniversityRochesterUSA
  4. 4.Department of Health Behavior and Health EducationUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations