Journal of African American Studies

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 61–74 | Cite as

Critical Inquiry into Urban African-American Students’ Perceptions of Engineering

  • Cameron D. Denson
  • Zanj K. Avery
  • John W. Schell
Articles

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to critically examine the perceptions that African-American high school students have towards engineering. A qualitative research design using criterion sampling and snowballing was used to select seven African-American students from urban high schools to participate in the research. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from participants attending urban high schools on the east and west coast. Using Critical Race Theory (CRT) as the theoretical framework, the study was able to produce “emergent themes” from collected data. Findings from this study will help researchers understand how African-American students may perceive the field of engineering.

Keywords

Critical race theory Perceptions Participatory action research Engineering 

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1998). Meeting America’s needs for the scientific and technological challenges of the twenty-first century: A White House roundtable dialogue for President Clinton’s initiative on race proceedings of panel discussion and position papers. Retrieved February 5, 2006 from clinton4.nara.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/racelane.vcs.Google Scholar
  2. Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M., & Nielsen, P. A. (1999). Action research. Communications of the ACM, 42(1), 94–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carter, N. (2005, November). Historical Context of Closing the Achievement Gap. Paper presented at the meeting for Challenges of Closing the Achievement Gap, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  4. Conde-Frazier, E. (2006). Participatory action research: practical theology for social justice. Religious Education, 101(3), 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crenshaw, K. (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York: New.Google Scholar
  6. Cresswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Cresswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspectives in the research process. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. deMarrais, K., & Lapan, S. D. (2004). Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Dixson, A. D., & Rousseau, C. K. (2005). Critical race theory in education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunbar, C., Rodriguez, D., & Parker, L. (2000). Race, subjectivity, and the interview process.Google Scholar
  13. Epstein, T. (2001). Racial identity and young people’s perspectives on social education. Theory into Practice, 40(1), 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher, T. A., & Griggs, M. B. (1995). Factors that influence the career development of African-American and Latino youth. Journal of Vocational Educational Research, 20(2), 57–74.Google Scholar
  15. Flores, R., Oates, J., & Weishew, N. (1996). Achieving student success in inner-city schools is possible, provided . . . Retrieved on February 4, 2006 from www.temple.edu/lss/pdf/publications/pubs97-2.pdf.
  16. Gordon, R. D. (2003). The history and growth of vocational education in America (pp. 45–49). Long Grove: Waveland.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, H. R. (2006). Mentoring young men of color: Meeting the needs of African-American and Latino students. Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  18. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative research in educational settings. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  19. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998). The black-white test score gap: An introduction. The black-white test score gap (pp. 1–51). Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  21. Jenkins, L. T., Om-Ra-Seti, K. K. (1997). Black futurist in the information age: Vision of a twenty-first century technological renaissance. KMT Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, K. V., & Watson, E. (2004). The W. E. B. Dubios and Booker T. Washington Debate: Effects upon African American roles in engineering and engineering education. The Journal of Technology Studies (pp. 65–70) Retrieved March 17, 2006 from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JOTS/v30/v30n4/pdf/johnson.pdf .
  23. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995a). But that’s just good teaching. The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995b). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.Google Scholar
  25. Levit, N. (1999). Critical of race theory: race, merit and civility. Georgetown law journal. Google Scholar
  26. Lipman, P. (1995). Bring out the best in them: the contribution of culturaaly relevant teachers to education reform. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 202–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lofland, J. (1971). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (pp. 90–133). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  28. Lynn, M., & Parker, L. (2006). Critical race studies in education: examining a decade of research on U.S. schools. The Urban Review. Google Scholar
  29. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research (pp. 47–51). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Maton, K. I., & Hrabowski, F. A., III. (2004). Increasing the number of African American PhDs in the sciences and engineering: a strength-based approach. American Psychologist, 59, 547–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matsuda, M., Lawrence, C., Delgado, R., & Crenshaw, K. (1993). Words that wound:critical race theory, assaultive speech and the first amendment. (Eds). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  32. McNiff, J. (2000). Action research in organizations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020. Washington: The National Academy.Google Scholar
  34. National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving the public understanding of engineering. Washington: The National Academies.Google Scholar
  35. National Center for Education Statistics (2001). Educational achievement and black-white inequality. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 28, 2002 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2001061. (pp. 31–43).
  36. O'Brien, R. (2001). An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research] In Roberto Richardson (Ed.), Theory and Practice of Action Research. João Pessoa, Brazil: Universidade Federal da Paraíba. (English version) Available: http://www.web.ca/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html (Accessed 20/1/2002).
  37. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 1–14). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Richards, L., & Morse, M. J. (2002). Read me first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Schell, J. W., & Schell, B. A. (2008). Learning and teaching for expert practice. In B. A. Schell & J. W. Schell (Eds.), Professional and clinical reasoning occupational therapy. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  40. Shujaa, M. J. (1995). Cultural self meets cultural other in the African-American experience: teachers’ responses to a curriculum content reform reform. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Singham, M. (2003). The achievement gap: myths and reality. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(8), 592–595.Google Scholar
  42. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7 (17). Retrieved Dec. 3, 2008 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.
  43. Stovall, D. (2006). Forging community in race and class: critical race theory and the quest for social justice in education. Race ethnicity and Education, 9(3), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Swepson, P. (1995). Action research: understanding its philosophy can improve your practice[On-line]. Availableat http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/philos.html.
  45. Tate, W. F. (1995). Returning to the root: culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wharton, D. E. (1992). A struggle worthy of note: The engineering and technological education of Black Americans. Connecticut: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  47. Wicklein, R. C. (2006). Five good reasons for engineering design as the focus for technology education. The Technology Teacher, 65(7), 25–29.Google Scholar
  48. Woodson, C. G. (1933). The mis-education of the Negro. Chicago: African American Images.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cameron D. Denson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zanj K. Avery
    • 2
  • John W. Schell
    • 3
  1. 1.National Center for Engineering and Technology Education, Department of Engineering and Technology Education, College of EngineeringUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Curriculum and Instruction, Emphasis: Engineering and Technology EducationUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  3. 3.Department of Workforce Education, Leadership & Social FoundationsUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations