Skip to main content
Log in

Literary study and evolutionary theory

A review essay

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several recent books have claimed to integrate literary study with evolutionary biology. All of the books here considered, except Robert Storey’s, adopt conceptions of evolutionary theory that are in some way marginal to the Darwinian adaptationist program. All the works attempt to connect evolutionary study with various other disciplines or methodologies: for example, with cultural anthropology, cognitive psychology, the psychology of emotion, neurobiology, chaos theory, or structuralist linguistics. No empirical paradigm has yet been established for this field, but important steps have been taken, especially by Storey, in formulating basic principles, identifying appropriate disciplinary connections, and marking out lines of inquiry. Reciprocal efforts are needed from biologists and social scientists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beer, G. 1983 Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot, and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, Bert 1996 The Descent of Love: Darwin and the Theory of Sexual Selection in American Fiction, 1871–1926. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Donald E. 1991 Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles 1952 Journal of Researches into the Geology and Natural History of the Various Countries Visited by H. M. S. Beagle, Under the Command of Captain Fitzroy, R. N., from 1832 to 1836. New York: Hafner. (originally published in 1839)

    Google Scholar 

  • 1968 The Origin of Species. London: Penguin. (originally published in 1859)

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2 vols, Princeton: Princeton University Press. (originally published in 1871)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dissanayake, Ellen 1988 What Is Art For? Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992 Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Comes From and Why. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, Northrop 1957 Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Paul R., and Norman Levitt 1994 Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, George 1988 Darwin and the Novelists: Patterns of Science in Victorian Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Lionel 1932 Darwin among the Poets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taine, Hippolyte 1879 History of English Literature, Henry van Laun, trans. New York: Henry Holt. (originally published in two volumes in 1863–1867)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. 1996 In Search of Nature. Washington, D. C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Carroll.

Additional information

For making criticisms that led to revisions in this review, I would like to thank Brett Cooke and Francis Steen. For the stimulation of ongoing conversations on these topics, I would like to acknowledge Ellen Dissanayake and Bob Storey.

Joseph Carroll is a professor of English at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. He has published books on Matthew Arnold and Wallace Stevens. In his most recent book, Evolution and LIterary Theory (1995), he integrates traditional literary concepts with a Darwinian conception of human nature, and he presents this synthesis as an alternative to poststructuralist theories of literature.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carroll, J. Literary study and evolutionary theory. Hum Nat 9, 273–292 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-998-1006-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-998-1006-1

Key words

Navigation