Abstract
Folk stories featuring prosocial content are ubiquitous across cultures. One explanation for the ubiquity of such stories is that stories teach people about the local socioecology, including norms of prosociality, and stories featuring prosocial content may increase generosity in listeners. We tested this hypothesis in a sample of 185 Hadza hunter-gatherers. We read participants a story in which the main character either swims with another person (control story) or rescues him from drowning (prosocial story). After hearing the story, participants played a dictator game with dried meat sticks and then were given a recall test of facts presented in the story. There was moderate evidence for a small effect of the prosocial story: participants who heard the prosocial story gave an estimated 0.22 [90% HDI: −0.12–0.57] more meat sticks than those who heard the control story. However, the association between generosity and sex, marital status, and region of residence was stronger; men gave more than women, unmarried participants gave more than married participants, and participants living in a region with more exposure to markets gave more than participants living further from markets. There was no evidence that the prosocial story was more easily recalled than the control story. These results provide some support for the hypothesis that prosocial stories can increase prosociality in listeners, though the effect of hearing a single story is small.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Materials, data, and code are publicly accessible at https://osf.io/rpbmz/.
References
Algoe, S. B., & Haidt, J. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: the “other-praising” emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802650519.
Apicella, C. L. (2018). High levels of rule-bending in a minimally religious and largely egalitarian forager population. Religion Brain & Behavior, 8(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1267034.
Apicella, C. L., Azevedo, E. M., Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2014). Evolutionary origins of the endowment effect: evidence from hunter-gatherers. American Economic Review, 104(6), 1793–1805. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.6.1793.
Apicella, C. L., & Barrett, H. C. (2016). Cross-cultural evolutionary psychology. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.015.
Apicella, C. L., Marlowe, F. W., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2012). Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature, 481(7382), 497–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10736.
Apicella, C. L., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2020). Beyond WEIRD: a review of the last decade and a look ahead to the global laboratory of the future. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.015.
Barrett, H. C. (2020). Towards a cognitive science of the human: cross-cultural approaches and their urgency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(8), 620–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.007.
Barrett, H. C. (2022). Psychology within and without the state. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-110248.
Bell, R., Schain, C., & Echterhoff, G. (2014). How selfish is memory for cheaters? Evidence for moral and egoistic biases. Cognition, 132(3), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.001.
Berbesque, J. C., Wood, B. M., Crittenden, A. N., Mabulla, A., & Marlowe, F. W. (2016). Eat first, share later: Hadza hunter–gatherer men consume more while foraging than in central places. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(4), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.01.003.
Bicchieri, C., & Chavez, A. (2010). Behaving as expected: public information and fairness norms. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.648.
Bicchieri, C., & Xiao, E. (2009). Do the right thing: but only if others do so. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(2), 191–208.
Blurton Jones, N. (2016). Deomgraphy and evolutionary ecology of Hadza hunter-gatherers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bolyanatz, A. H. (2010). Does the use of money affect results in experimental games? Comparing cash and betel nut in dictator and ultimatum games on New Ireland. In K. A. McElhanon, & G. Reesink (Eds.), Mosaic of languages and cultures: studies celebrating the career of Karl J. Franklin (pp. 327–350). SIL International.
Boyd, B. (2009). On the origin of stories: evolution, cognition, and fiction. Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 11–32.
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.
Bürkner, P. C. (2017). brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01.
Bürkner, P. C., & Charpentier, E. (2020). Modelling monotonic effects of ordinal predictors in Bayesian regression models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12195., bmsp.12195.
Bürkner, P. C., & Vuorre, M. (2019). Ordinal regression models in psychology: a tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918823199.
Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture-gene coevolution, norm psychology, and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(5), 218–226.
Coe, K., Aiken, N. E., & Palmer, C. T. (2006). Once upon a time: ancestors and the evolutionary significance of stories. Anthropological Forum, 16(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664670600572421.
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31(3), 187–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1.
da Silva, S. G., & Tehrani, J. J. (2016). Comparative phylogenetic analyses uncover the ancient roots of Indo-European folktales. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1), 150645. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150645.
Dodell-Feder, D., & Tamir, D. I. (2018). Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: a meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(11), 1713–1727. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000395.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). How conversations around campfires came to be. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(39), 14013–14014. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416382111
Gabry, J., & Cesnovar, R. (2020). cmdstanr: R interface to “CmdStan.” https://mc-stan.org/cmdstanr
Goerg, S. J., Rand, D., & Walkowitz, G. (2020). Framing effects in the prisoner’s dilemma but not in the dictator game. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-019-00081-1.
Greitemeyer, T. (2009a). Effects of songs with prosocial lyrics on prosocial behavior: further evidence and a mediating mechanism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(11), 1500–1511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209341648.
Greitemeyer, T. (2009b). Effects of songs with prosocial lyrics on prosocial thoughts, affect, and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 186–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.003.
Gurven, M., Zanolini, A., & Schniter, E. (2008). Culture sometimes matters: intra-cultural variation in pro-social behavior among Tsimane Amerindians. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67(3–4), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.09.005.
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., et al. (2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(6), 797–815.
Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., Mcelreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., et al. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 1480, 1480–1484. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182238.
Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The WEIRDest people in the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2), 1–75.
House, B. R., Kanngiesser, P., Barrett, H. C., Broesch, T., Cebioglu, S., Crittenden, A. N., et al. (2020). Universal norm psychology leads to societal diversity in prosocial behaviour and development. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0734-z.
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005.
Kay, M. (2021). tidybayes: Tidy data and geoms for Bayesian models, version 3.0.0. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1308151
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2018a). Bayesian data analysis for newcomers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 155?177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1272-1
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2018b). The Bayesian New Statistics: hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 178–206. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4.
Lamba, S., & Mace, R. (2011). Demography and ecology drive variation in cooperation across human populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(35), 14426–14430.
Lapsley, D. K., & Lasky, B. (2001). Prototypic moral character. Indentity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1(4), 345–363.
Larsen, N. E., Lee, K., & Ganea, P. A. (2018). Do storybooks with anthropomorphized animal characters promote prosocial behavior in young children? Developmental Science, 21, e12590. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12590.
Lee, K., Talwar, V., McCarthy, A., Ross, I., Evans, A., & Arruda, C. (2014). Can classic moral stories promote honesty in children? Psychological Science, 25(8), 1630–1636.
Lesorogol, C. K. (2007). Bringing norms in. Current Anthropology, 48(6), 920–926. https://doi.org/10.1086/523017.
Lew-Levy, S., Lavi, N., Reckin, R., Cristóbal-Azkarate, J., & Ellis-Davies, K. (2018). How do hunter-gatherer children learn social and gender norms? A meta-ethnographic review. Cross-Cultural Research, 52(2), 213–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397117723552.
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x.
Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002.
Marlowe, F. W. (2004a). What explains Hadza food sharing? In M. Alvard (Ed.), Socioeconomic aspects of human behavioral ecology (pp. 69–88). Emerald Group.
Marlowe, F. W. (2004b). Dictators and ultimatums in an egalitarian society of hunter-gatherers: the Hadza of Tanzania. In J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, & H. Gintis (Eds.), Foundations of human sociality: economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies (pp. 168–193). Oxford University Press.
Marlowe, F. W. (2005). Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 14(2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20046.
Marlowe, F. W. (2010). The Hadza: Hunter-gatherers of Tanzania. Berkley: University of California Press.
McElreath, R. (2016). Statistical rethinking. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
Michalopoulos, S., & Xue, M. M. (2021). Folklore. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(4), 1993–2046. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab003.
Narvaez, D., & Gleason, T. (2007). The relation of moral judgment development and education experience to recall of moral narratives and expository texts. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(3), 251–276.
Pollom, T. R., Cross, C. L., Herlosky, K. N., Ford, E., & Crittenden, A. N. (2020). Effects of a mixed-subsistence diet on the growth of Hadza children. American Journal of Human Biology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23455.
Pollom, T. R., Herlosky, K. N., Mabulla, I. A., & Crittenden, A. N. (2020). Changes in juvenile foraging behavior among the Hadza of Tanzania during early transition to a mixed-subsistence economy. Human Nature, 31, 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-020-09364-7.
Pontzer, H., Raichlen, D. A., Wood, B. M., Mabulla, A. Z. P., Racette, S. B., & Marlowe, F. W. (2012). Hunter-gatherer energetics and human obesity. PLoS One, 7(7), e40503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040503.
R CoreTeam (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/.
Rathje, S., Hackel, L., & Zaki, J. (2021). Attending live theatre improves empathy, changes attitudes, and leads to pro-social behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95, 104138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104138.
Ross, R. M., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2016). Folktale transmission in the Arctic provides evidence for high bandwidth social learning among hunter-gatherer groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(1), 47–53.
Ruth, N. (2017). Heal the world”: a field experiment on the effects of music with prosocial lyrics on prosocial behavior. Psychology of Music, 45(2), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735616652226.
Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2001a). Narrative theory and function: why evolution matters. Philosophy and Literature, 25(2), 233–250.
Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2001b). Food, foragers, and folklore: the role of narrative in human subsistence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00063-0.
Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2017). Oral storytelling as evidence of pedagogy in forager societies. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00471. 8.
Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2021). Co-occurrence of ostensive communication and generalizable knowledge in forager storytelling. Human Nature, 32(1), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-021-09385-w.
Schnall, S., & Roper, J. (2012). Elevation puts moral values into action. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611423595.
Schnall, S., Roper, J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2010). Elevation leads to altruistic behavior. Psychological Science, 21(3), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609359882.
Smith, D., Dyble, M., Thompson, J., Major, K., Page, A. E., Chaudhary, N., et al. (2016). Camp stability predicts patterns of hunter-gatherer cooperation. Royal Society Open Science, 3, 160131.
Smith, D., Schlaepfer, P., Major, K., Dyble, M., Page, A. E., Thompson, J., et al. (2017). Cooperation and the evolution of hunter-gatherer storytelling. Nature Communications, 8(1853), 1853.
Smith, K. M., & Apicella, C. L. (2020a). Partner choice in human evolution: the role of cooperation, foraging ability, and culture in Hadza campmate preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.009.
Smith, K. M., & Apicella, C. L. (2020b). Hadza hunter-gatherers disagree on perceptions of moral character. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(5), 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619865051.
Smith, K. M., Larroucau, T., Mabulla, I. A., & Apicella, C. L. (2018). Hunter-gatherers maintain assortativity in cooperation despite high levels of residential change and mixing. Current Biology, 28(19), 3152–3157e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.064.
Smith, K. M., Mabulla, I. A., & Apicella, C. L. (2022). Hadza hunter-gatherers with greater exposure to other cultures share more with generous campmates. Biology Letters, 18(7), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0157.
Sorokowska, A., Marczak, M., Misiak, M., Oleszkiewicz, A., Niemczyk, A., Wróbel, M., & Sorokowski, P. (2021). Humans tend to share food more generously than money and other objects: preliminary evidence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2747.
Sparks, A. M., Fessler, D. M. T., & Holbrook, C. (2019). Elevation, an emotion for prosocial contagion, is experienced more strongly by those with greater expectations of the cooperativeness of others. PLoS One, 14(12), e0226071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226071.
Stagnaro, M. N., Stibbard-Hawkes, D. N. E., & Apicella, C. L. (2022). Do religious and market-based institutions promote cooperation in Hadza hunter-gatherers? Religion. Brain & Behavior, 12(1–2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2021.2006293.
Stan Development Team (2017). RStan: The R interface to Stan. http://mc-stan.org
Stibbard-Hawkes, D. N. E., Smith, K. M., & Apicella, C. L. (2022). Why hunt? Why gather? Why share? Hadza assessments of foraging and food-sharing motive. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.03.001.
Tappan, M. B. (1997). Analyzing stories of moral experience: narrative, voice, and the dialogical self. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1), 379–386.
Vandekerckhove, J., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). Model comparison and the principle of parsimony. In J. R. Busemeyer, Z. Wang, J. T. Townsend, & A. Eidels (Eds.), Oxford handbook of computational and mathematical psychology (pp. 300–319). Oxford University Press.
Wickham, H. (2020). modelr: modelling functions that work with the pipe. https://cran.r-project.org/package=modelr
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., et al. (2019). Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686.
Wiessner, P. (2014). Embers of society: Firelight talk among Ju/’hoansi bushmen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(39), 14027–14035.
Wood, B. M., & Marlowe, F. W. (2013). Household and kin provisioning by Hadza men. Human Nature, 24, 280–317.
Workman, C. I., Smith, K. M., Apicella, C. L., & Chatterjee, A. (2022). Evidence against the “anomalous-is-bad” stereotype in Hadza hunter gatherers. Scientific Reports, 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12440-w.
Acknowledgements
We thank Endeko Endeko, Deus Haraja, and Victoria Maghalli for their assistance in data collection, Momoya Merus for allowing us to stay at his compound during data collection, and Audax Mabulla for his administrative support in Tanzania. We thank Anne Pisor and Duncan Stibbard-Hawkes for providing thoughtful comments on an earlier draft. And we thank the Hadza for their participation in the research.
Funding
This work was supported by a subgrant through the Moral Beacons Project, funded by the Templeton Religion Trust and Wake Forest University, and the University of Pennsylvania’s MindCORE program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KMS designed the study, collected data, conducted the analyses, and drafted the manuscript; IAM collected data and revised the manuscript; CLA designed the study and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing financial or nonfinancial interests to declare.
Ethics Approval
Study protocols were approved by the IRB at the University of Pennsylvania and permission to conduct research in Tanzania was granted by the Tanzanian Commission for Science and Technology.
Consent for Publication
Participants gave verbal consent to participate in the study individually. Permission to work and stay in a camp was granted by each camp as a group.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, K.M., Mabulla, I.A. & Apicella, C.L. Hearing Prosocial Stories Increases Hadza Hunter-Gatherers’ Generosity in an Economic Game. Hum Nat 34, 103–121 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-023-09444-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-023-09444-4