Gossip (evaluative talk about others) is ubiquitous. Gossip allows important rules to be clarified and reinforced, and it allows individuals to keep track of their social networks while strengthening their bonds to the group. The purpose of this study is to decipher the nature of gossip and how it relates to friendship connections. To measure how gossip relates to friendship, participants from men’s and women’s collegiate competitive rowing (crew) teams (N = 44) noted their friendship connections and their tendencies to gossip about each of their teammates. Using social network analysis, we found that the crew members’ friend group connectedness significantly correlated with their positive and negative gossip network involvement. Higher connectedness among friends was associated with less involvement in spreading negative gossip and/or being a target of negative gossip. More central connectedness to the friend group was associated with more involvement in spreading positive gossip and/or being a target of positive gossip. These results suggest that the spread of both positive and negative gossip may influence and be influenced by friendship connections in a social network.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
All data and scripts for this study are available at: https://osf.io/95q82/
Barkow, J. H. (1992). Beneath new culture is old psychology: Gossip and social stratification. In The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 627–637).
Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2004). The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(11), 3747–3752. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400087101
Barrett, H. C. (2020). Deciding what to observe: Thoughts for a post-WEIRD generation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.05.006
Baumeister, R. F., Zhang, L., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-26188.8.131.52
Boehm, C. (2012). Moral origins: The evolutions of virtue, altruism, and shame. Basic Books.
Boehm, C. (2014). The moral consequences of social selection. Behaviour, 151(2–3), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003143
Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. The American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182.
Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks, 29(4), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002
Bonacich, P., & Lloyd, P. (2001). Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations. Social Networks, 23(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00038-7
Bringmann, L. F., Elmer, T., Epskamp, S., Krause, R. W., Schoch, D., Wichers, M., Wigman, J. T. W., & Snippe, E. (2019). What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(8), 892–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000446
Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 395–422.
De Backer, C. J. S., Nelissen, M., Vyncke, P., Braeckman, J., & McAndrew, F. T. (2007). Celebrities: From teachers to friends: A test of two hypotheses on the adaptiveness of celebrity gossip. Human Nature, 18(4), 334–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9023-z
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1997). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Harvard University Press.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-26184.108.40.206
Dunbar, R. I. M., Marriott, A., & Duncan, N. D. C. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912493
Ekal, B. (2006). “How a kaynana should behave?” Discussions on the role of mothers-in-law in two gün groups. European Journal of Turkish Studies. https://doi.org/10.4000/ejts.619
Ellwardt, L., Steglich, C., & Wittek, R. (2012). The co-evolution of gossip and friendship in workplace social networks. Social Networks, 34(4), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.07.002
Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Preschoolers affect others’ reputations through prosocial gossip. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12143
Epskamp, S., Cramer, A., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V., & Borsboom, D. (2012). Qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1–18.
Fazio, A. F. (1977). A concurrent validation study of the NCHS general well-being schedule. Vital and Health Statistics Publications, series 2. Data evaluation and methods research, (73), 1–53. Available online at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_073.pdf
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Schultz, M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25(3), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613510184
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Stellar, J., & Keltner, D. (2012). The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1015–1030. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026650
Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-26220.127.116.11
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
Grosser, T. J., Lopez-Kidwell, V., & Labianca, G. (2010). A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group and Organization Management, 35(2), 177–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601109360391
Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2006). Toward a psychological science for a cultural species. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00015.x
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83; discussion 83–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2006a). Psychological adaptations for assessing gossip veracity. Human Nature, 17(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-006-1013-z
Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2006b). Sex differences in indirect aggression: Psychological evidence from young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(3), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.11.001
Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2019). Gossip, reputation, and friendship in within-group competition: An evolutionary perspective. Handbook of Reputation and Gossip, 275–302.
Hruschka, D. J., Medin, D. L., Rogoff, B., & Henrich, J. (2018). Pressing questions in the study of psychological and behavioral diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(45), 11366–11368. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814733115
Jacquet, J., Hauert, C., Traulsen, A., & Milinski, M. (2011). Shame and honour drive cooperation. Biology Letters, 7(6), 899–901. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0367
Jaeger, M. E., Skleder, A. A., Rind, B., & Rosnow, R. L. (1994). Gossip, gossipers, gossipees. In R. F. Goodman & A. Ben-Ze’ev (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 154–168). University Press of Kansas.
Kniffin, K. M., & Palacio, D. (2018). Trash-talking and trolling. Human Nature, 29(3), 353–369. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-018-9317-3
Kniffin, K. M., & Wilson, D. S. (2005). Utilities of gossip across organizational levels: Multilevel selection, free-riders, and teams. Human Nature, 16(3), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-005-1011-6
Kniffin, K. M., & Wilson, D. S. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on workplace gossip: Why and how gossip can serve groups. Group and Organization Management, 35(2), 150–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601109360390
Krems, J. (2016). Verbal derogation among women. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6
Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.187
Martinescu, E., Janssen, O., & Nijstad, B. A. (2019). Gossip as a resource: How and why power relationships shape gossip behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 153(April), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.05.006
McAndrew, F. T., Bell, E. K., & Garcia, C. M. (2007). Who do we tell and whom do we tell on? Gossip as a strategy for status enhancement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(7), 1562–1577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00227.x
McAndrew, F. T., & Milenkovic, M. A. (2002). Of tabloids and family secrets: The evolutionary psychology of gossip. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 1064–1082.
Misch, A., Over, H., & Carpenter, M. (2016). I won’t tell: Young children show loyalty to their group by keeping group secrets. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 142, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.016
Peters, K., Jetten, J., Radova, D., & Austin, K. (2017). Gossiping about deviance: Evidence that deviance spurs the gossip that builds bonds. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1610–1619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617716918
Peters, K., & Kashima, Y. (2007). From social talk to social action: Shaping the social triad with emotion sharing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 780–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1680
Peters, K., & Kashima, Y. (2015). Bad habit or social good? How perceptions of gossiper morality are related to gossip content. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(6), 784–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2123
Piazza, J., & Bering, J. M. (2008). Concerns about reputation via gossip promote generous allocations in an economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(3), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.002
Piazza, J., & Bering, J. M. (2010). The coevolution of secrecy and stigmatization. Human Nature, 21(3), 290–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-010-9090-4
Rand, D. G., & Nowak, M. A. (2013). Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003
Robbins, M. L., & Karan, A. (2019). Who gossips and how in everyday life? Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619837000
Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.
Smith, K. M., & Apicella, C. L. (2020). Partner choice in human evolution: The role of cooperation, foraging ability, and culture in Hadza campmate preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.009
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H. J., Semmann, D., & Milinski, M. (2007). Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(44), 17435–17440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704598104
Tape, C. (2019). Exploring the construction and maintenance of social relationships within an elite female football club using photo interviews and visual concept relationship mapping methods. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bournemouth University.
Vaillancourt, T., & Krems, J. A. (2018). An evolutionary psychological perspective of indirect aggression in girls and women. In Sarah M. Coyne and Jamie M. Ostrov (Eds), The development of relational aggression. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190491826.003.0008
von Rueden, C. R., Redhead, D., O’Gorman, R., Kaplan, H., & Gurven, M. (2019). The dynamics of men’s cooperation and social status in a small-scale society. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1367
von Rueden, C., & van Vugt, M. (2015). Leadership in small-scale societies: Some implications for theory, research, and practice. Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 978–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.004
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
Wilson, D. S., Wilczynski, C., Wells, A., & Weiser, L. (2000). Gossip and other aspects of language as group-level adaptations. In C. Heyes & L. Huber (Eds.), Vienna series in theoretical biology. The evolution of cognition (pp. 347–365). The MIT Press.
Wu, J., Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2016a). Reputation, gossip, and human cooperation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(6), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12255
Wu, J., Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2016b). Reputation management: Why and how gossip enhances generosity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(3), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.11.001
Wyckoff, J. P., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2019). Gossip as an intrasexual competition strategy: Predicting information sharing from potential mate versus competitor mating strategies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.08.006
Yip, J. A., Schweitzer, M. E., & Nurmohamed, S. (2018). Trash-talking: Competitive incivility motivates rivalry, performance, and unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.06.002
Zhu, X., & Smith, R. (2016). Advancing research on the spread of stigmatizing beliefs with insights from rumor transmission. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(11), 1342–1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216657382
We would like to thank all participants; Psi Chi, The International Honor Society in Psychology, for their support to Meltem Yucel; and the Franklin & Marshall College Committee on Grants for funding to Rebecca Glass. We would also like to thank Allan Clifton for his very generous guidance with the study, and Alex Christensen for guidance with statistical analyses.
This work was supported by Psi Chi, The International Honor Society in Psychology and the Franklin & Marshall College Committee on Grants.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Human Research Ethics committee of the Franklin & Marshall College, on 02/07/2017 for the application #R_z8tMp5lSWgH7STL.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for Publication
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Yucel, M., Sjobeck, G.R., Glass, R. et al. Being in the Know. Hum Nat 32, 603–621 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-021-09409-5
- Negative gossip
- Positive gossip
- Social network analysis