Skip to main content

Maternal Competition in Women

Human Nature volume 28, pages 92–116 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

We examined maternal competition, an unexplored form of competition between women. Given women’s high investment in offspring and mothers’ key role in shaping their reproductive, social, and cultural success as adults, we might expect to see maternal competition between women as well as mate competition. Predictions about the effect of maternal characteristics (age, relationship status, educational background, number of children, investment in the mothering role) and child variables (age, sex) were drawn from evolutionary theory and sociological research. Mothers of primary school children (in two samples: N = 210 and 169) completed a series of questionnaires. A novel nine-item measure of maternal competitive behavior (MCQ) and two subscales assessing Covert (MCQ-C) and Face-to-Face (MCQ-FF) forms of competition were developed using confirmatory factor analysis. Competitiveness (MCQ score) was predicted by maternal investment, single motherhood, fewer children, and (marginally) child’s older age. The effect of single motherhood (but not other predictors) was partially mediated by greater maternal investment. In response to a scenario of their child underperforming relative to their peers, a mother’s competitive distress was a positive function of the importance she ascribed to their success and her estimation of her child’s ability. Her competitive distress was highly correlated with the distress she attributed to a female friend, hinting at bidirectional dyadic effects. Qualitative responses indicated that nonspecific bragging and boasting about academic achievements were the most common irritants. Although 40% of women were angered or annoyed by such comments, less than 5% endorsed a direct hostile response. Instead, competitive mothers were conversationally shunned and rejected as friends. We suggest that the interdependence of mothers based on reciprocal childcare has supported a culture of egalitarianism that is violated by explicit competitiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. We are grateful to an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

References

  • Ackerman, J. T., & Eadie, J. M. (2003). Current versus future reproduction: an experimental test of parental investment decisions using nest desertion by mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 264–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: a meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benenson, J. F., & Schinazi, J. (2004). Sex differences in reactions to outperforming same-sex friends. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, B. A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogin, B., Bragg, J., & Kuzawa, C. (2014). Humans are not cooperative breeders but practice biocultural reproduction. Annals of Human Biology, 41(4), 368–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, M. H., & Putnick, D. L. (2007). Chronological age, cognitions, and practices in European American mothers: a multivariate study of parenting. Developmental Psychology, 43, 850–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D., & Dedden, L. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 295–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, A. P., & Fisher, M. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Campbell, A. (2013). The evolutionary psychology of women’s aggression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 368, 20130078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (2015). The evolutionary psychology of women’s competition and aggression. In D. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (second ed., pp. 684–703). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chae, J. (2015). “Am I a better mother than you?” Media and 21st-century motherhood in the context of the social comparison theory. Communication Research, 42(4), 503–525.

  • Closson, L. M. (2009). Status and gender differences in early adolescents’ descriptions of popularity. Social Development, 18, 412–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1984). Reproductive effort and terminal investment in iteroparous animals. The American Naturalist, 123, 212–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2002). Breeding together: kin selection and mutualism in cooperative vertebrates. Science, 296, 69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Huchard, E. (2013). Social competition and selection in males and females. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 368, 20130074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. K., & Karraker, K. H. (2000). Parenting self-efficacy among mothers of school-age children: conceptualisation, measurement and correlates. Family Relations, 49(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (2011). Competitive mothering and delegated care: class relationships in nanny and au pair employment. Studies in the Maternal, 3(2). Retrieved from: www.mamsie.bbk.ac.uk

  • Crittenden, A. N., & Marlowe, F. W. (2008). Allomaternal care among the Hadza of Tanzania. Human Nature, 19, 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, S., Gustavsen, R., & Slagsvold, T. (1996). Risk taking during parental care: a test of three hypotheses applied to the pied flycatcher. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: the discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lacey, M. (2012). Temper tantrums, sleepless nights, bullying and sibling rivalry: Mothers reveal the 50 most challenging aspects of parenthood. Daily Mail (August 29). Retrieved from: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2195310/Mothers-reveal-challenging-aspects-parenthood-DryNites-survey.html#ixzz3p7ReEz8R.

  • Digby, L. (2000). Infanticide by female mammals: implications for the evolution of social systems. In C. P. van Schaik & C. H. Janson (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 423–446). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S. J., & Michaels, M. W. (2004). The mommy myth: The idealization of motherhood and how it has undermined all women. New York: Free Press.

  • Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Redden, J. P., & White, A. E. (2015). Spending on daughters versus sons in economic recessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(3), 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: a meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2000). Gender and emotions in different cultures. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: social psychological perspectives (pp. 71–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M., & Cox, A. (2011). Four strategies used during intrasexual competition for mates. Personal Relationships, 18(1), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D., & Hills, T. T. (2012). The baby effect and young male syndrome: social influences on cooperative risk-taking in women and men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 530–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. L., & Moule, K. R. (2013). A new direction for intrasexual competition research: cooperative versus competitive motherhood. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7(4), 318–325.

  • Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and the proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. (2000). Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206, 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

  • Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Longevity among hunter-gatherers: a cross-cultural examination. Population and Development Review, 33(2), 321–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn-Holbrook, J., Holt-Lunstad, J., Holbrook, C., Coyne, S. M., & Lawson, E. T. (2011). Maternal defense: breast feeding increases aggression by reducing stress. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1288–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzavan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, B. S. (1991). Demography and childcare in preindustrial societies. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hock, E., McBride, S., & Gnezda, M. T. (1989). Maternal separation anxiety: mother-infant separation from the maternal perspective. Child Development, 60(4), 793–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (1976). Care and exploitation of nonhuman primate infants by conspecifics other than the mother. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 6, 101–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother Nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York: Pantheon.

  • Hrdy, S. B. (2011). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. D., & Swanson, D. H. (2006). Constructing the “good mother”: the experience of mothering ideologies by work status. Sex Roles, 54, 509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. H. (2009). The force of selection on the human life cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, M. C., Nesse, R. M., & Hofferth, S. (2001). The Trivers-Willard hypothesis of parental investment: no effect in the contemporary United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 343–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 919–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFontana, K. M., & Cillesen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukas, D., & Clutton-Brock, T. (2012). Cooperative breeding and monogamy in mammalian societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 2151–2156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R. (2013). Cooperation and conflict between women in the family. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22(5), 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R., & Sear, R. (2014). Are humans cooperative breeders? In E. Voland, A. Chasiotis, & W. Schiefenhovel (Eds.), Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life (pp. 143–159). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

  • Mah, B. L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Smith, R. (2015). Oxytocin promotes protective behaviour in depressed mothers: a pilot study with the enthusiastic stranger paradigm. Depression and Anxiety, 32, 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragozin, A. S., Basham, R. B., Crnic, K. A., Greenberg, M. T., & Robinson, N. M. (1982). Effects of maternal age on parenting role. Developmental Psychology, 18, 627–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, D.R., Prum, R., & Levandowsky, M. (2012). Sexual selection, social conflict and the female perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 367 (1600), whole issue.

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2015). Fundamentals of human mating strategies. In D. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (second ed., pp. 294–315). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silk, J. (1993). The evolution of social conflict among female primates. In W. A. Mason & S. P. Mendoza (Eds.), Primate social conflict (pp. 49–84). Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockley, P., & Campbell, A. (2013). Female competition and aggression: interdisciplinary perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 368, 20130073.

  • Strassman, B. I. (2011). Cooperation and competition in a cliff-dwelling people. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108 (Supplement 2), 10894–10901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily Telegraph. (2016). Are you a supermum? Top 40 signs of the ‘perfect mother’ revealed. April 5. Retrieved from: http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/658384/Supermum-top-40-signs-perfect-mother.

  • Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Today (2011). The mom-judging Olympics: A competition nobody meant to enter. The Today Show (NBC), August 11. Retrieved from: http://www.today.com/parents/mom-judging-olympics-competition-nobody-meant-enter-849454.

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, C., & Ball, S. J. (2007). "Making up” the middle-class child: families, activities and class dispositions. Sociology, 41(6), 1061–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasser, S. K., & Barash, D. P. (1981). The selfish “allomother”: a comment on Scollay and DeBold (1980). Ethology and Sociobiology, 2, 91–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1996). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK

    Catherine Linney, Laurel Korologou-Linden & Anne Campbell

Authors
  1. Catherine Linney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laurel Korologou-Linden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anne Campbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Campbell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linney, C., Korologou-Linden, L. & Campbell, A. Maternal Competition in Women. Hum Nat 28, 92–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-016-9279-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-016-9279-2

Keywords

  • Mothers
  • Maternal competition
  • Women
  • Reproductive success
  • Reproductive investment