Gender Interacts with Opioid Receptor Polymorphism A118G and Serotonin Receptor Polymorphism −1438 A/G on Speed-Dating Success

Abstract

We examined an understudied but potentially important source of romantic attraction—genetics—using a speed-dating paradigm. The mu opioid receptor (OPRM1) polymorphism A118G (rs1799971) and the serotonin receptor (HTR2A) polymorphism −1438 A/G (rs6311) were studied because they have been implicated in social affiliation. Guided by the social role theory of mate selection and prior genetic evidence, we examined these polymorphisms’ gender-specific associations with speed-dating success (i.e., date offers, mate desirability). A total of 262 single Asian Americans went on speed-dates with members of the opposite gender and completed interaction questionnaires about their partners. Consistent with our prediction, significant gender-by-genotype interactions were found for speed-dating success. Specifically, the minor variant of A118G (G-allele), which has been linked to submissiveness/social sensitivity, predicted greater speed-dating success for women, whereas the minor variant of −1438 A/G (G-allele), which has been linked to leadership/social dominance, predicted greater speed-dating success for men. For both polymorphisms, reverse “dampening” effects of minor variants were found for opposite-gender counterparts. These results support previous research on the importance of the opioid and serotonergic systems in social affiliation, indicating that their influence extends to dating success, with opposite, yet gender-norm consistent, effects for men and women.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Anderson, N. H., & Barrios, A. A. (1961). Primacy effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 346–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barr, C. S., Schwandt, M. L., Lindell, S. G., Higley, J. D., Maestripieri, D., Goldman, D., & Heilig, M. (2008). Variation at the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) influences attachment behavior in infant primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 5277–5281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin, D. J., Cesarini, D., van der Loos, M. J., Dawes, C. T., Koellinger, P. D., Magnusson, P. K., & Visscher, P. M. (2012). The genetic architecture of economic and political preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 8026–8031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Betzig, L. (1993). Sex, succession, and stratification in the first six civilizations: how powerful men reproduced, passed power on to their sons, and used power to defend their wealth, women, and children. In L. Ellis (Ed.), Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality (pp. 37–74). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bond, C., LaForge, K. S., Tian, M., Melia, D., Zhang, S., Borg, L., & Yu, L. (1998). Single-nucleotide polymorphism in the human mu opioid receptor gene alters β-endorphin binding and activity: possible implications for opiate addiction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 9608–9613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bray, N. J., Buckland, P. R., Hall, H., Owen, M. J., & O’Donovan, M. C. (2004). The serotonin-2 A receptor gene locus does not contain common polymorphism affecting mRNA levels in adult brain. Molecular Psychiatry, 9, 109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bunzel, R., Blümcke, I., Cichon, S., Normann, S., Schramm, J., Propping, P., & Nöthen, M. M. (1998). Polymorphic imprinting of the serotonin-2 A (5-HT 2 A) receptor gene in human adult brain. Molecular Brain Research, 59, 90–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burt, S. A. (2008). Genes and popularity: evidence of an evocative gene-environment correlation. Psychological Science, 19, 112–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burt, S. A. (2009). A mechanistic explanation of popularity: genes, rule breaking, and evocative gene–environment correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 783–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., & Yang, K.-S. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cao, J., Liu, X., Han, S., Zhang, C. K., Liu, Z., & Li, D. (2014). Association of the HTR2A gene with alcohol and heroin abuse. Human Genetics, 133, 357–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cashdan, E. (1995). Hormones, sex, and status in women. Hormones and Behavior, 29, 354–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chabris, C. F., Hebert, B. M., Benjamin, D. J., Beauchamp, J., Cesarini, D., van der Loos, M., & Freese, J. (2012). Most reported genetic associations with general intelligence are probably false positives. Psychological Science, 23, 1314–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chabris, C. F., Lee, J. J., Cesarini, D., Benjamin, D. J., & Laibson, D. I. (2015). The Fourth Law of behavior genetics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 304–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Depue, R. A., & Morrone-Strupinsky, J. V. (2005). A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding: implications for conceptualizing a human trait of affiliation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 313–395.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, L., Bouma, E., & Veenstra, R. (2013). The secret ingredient for social success of young males: A functional polymorphism in the 5HT2A serotonin receptor gene. PloS One, 8, e54821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dorus, S., Vallender, E. J., Evans, P. D., Anderson, J. R., Gilbert, S. L., Mahowald, M., & Lahn, B. T. (2004). Accelerated evolution of nervous system genes in the origin of Homo sapiens. Cell, 119, 1027–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ding, Y. C., Chi, H. C., Grady, D. L., Morishima, A., Kidd, J. R., Kidd, K. K., & Zhang, Y. P. (2002). Evidence of positive selection acting at the human dopamine receptor D4 gene locus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 309–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dougherty, T. W., Turban, D. B., & Callender, J. C. (1994). Confirming first impressions in the employment interview: A field study of interviewer behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 659–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Edwards, D. H., & Kravitz, E. A. (1997). Serotonin, social status and aggression. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 812–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Finkel, E. J., & Eastwick, P. W. (2008). Speed-dating. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fisman, R., Iyengar, S. S., Kamenica, E., & Simonson, I. (2008). Racial preferences in dating. The Review of Economic Studies, 75, 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fu, W., & Akey, J. M. (2013). Selection and adaptation in the human genome. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 467–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Geschwind, D. H., & Flint, J. (2015). Genetics and genomics of psychiatric disease. Science, 349, 1489–1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gurung, R. A. R., & Vespia, K. (2007). Looking good, teaching well? Linking liking, looks, and learning. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hastie, B. A., Riley III, J. L., Kaplan, L., Herrera, D. G., Campbell, C. M., Virtusio, K., et al. (2012). Ethnicity interacts with the OPRM1 gene in experimental pain sensitivity. Pain, 153, 1610–1619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hasvik, E., Schistad, E. I., Grøvle, L., Haugen, A. J., Røe, C., & Gjerstad, J. (2014). Subjective health complaints in patients with lumbar radicular pain and disc herniation are associated with a sex - OPRM1 A118G polymorphism interaction: a prospective 1-year observational study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 15, 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hawks, J., Wang, E. T., Cochran, G. M., Harpending, H. C., & Moyzis, R. K. (2007). Recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 20753–20758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015). The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLoS Biology, 13, e1002106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Higley, J. D., Mehlman, P. T., Poland, R. E., Taub, D. M., Vickers, J., Suomi, S. J., & Linnoila, M. (1996). CSF testosterone and 5-HIAA correlate with different types of aggressive behaviors. Biological Psychiatry, 40, 1067–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang, C. J., Liu, H. F., Su, N. Y., Hsu, Y. W., Yang, C. H., Chen, C. C., & Tsai, P. S. (2008). Association between human opioid receptor genes polymorphisms and pressure pain sensitivity in females. Anaesthesia, 63, 1288–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ickes, W. (1993). Traditional gender roles: Do they make, and then break, our relationships? Journal of Social Issues, 49, 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. Chance, 18, 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ioannidis, J. P., & Khoury, M. J. (2011). Improving validation practices in “omics” research. Science, 334, 1230–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Iqbal, S. A., Wallach, J. D., Khoury, M. J., Schully, S. D., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). Reproducible research practices and transparency across the biomedical literature. PLoS Biology, 14, e1002333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., & Vemon, P. A. (1996). Heritability of the Big Five personality dimensions and their facets: A twin study. Journal of Personality, 64, 577–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kamboh, M. I., Demirci, F. Y., Wang, X., Minster, R. L., Carrasquillo, M. M., Pankratz, V. S., & Logue, M. W. (2012). Genome-wide association study of Alzheimer’s disease. Translational psychiatry, 2, e117.

  42. Kato, M. V., Shimizu, T., Nagayoshi, M., Kaneko, A., Sasaki, M. S., & Ikawa, Y. (1996). Genomic imprinting of the human serotonin-receptor (HTR2) gene involved in development of retinoblastoma. American Journal of Human Genetics, 59, 1084–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Zierk, K. L., & Krones, J. M. (1994). Evolution and social cognition: contrast effects as a function of sex, dominance, and physical attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kogan, A., Saslow, L. R., Impett, E. A., Oveis, C., Keltner, D., & Saturn, S. R. (2011). Thin-slicing study of the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene and the evaluation and expression of the prosocial disposition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 19189–19192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lohmueller, K. E., Pearce, C. L., Pike, M., Lander, E. S., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2003). Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease. Nature Genetics, 33, 177–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ludbrook, J., & Dudley, H. (1998). Why permutation tests are superior to t and F tests in biomedical research. American Statistician, 52, 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Luo, S., & Zhang, G. (2009). What leads to romantic attraction: Similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? evidence from a speed-dating study. Journal of Personality, 77, 933–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Machin, A. J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). The brain opioid theory of social attachment: a review of the evidence. Behaviour, 148, 985–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Manolio, T. A., Collins, F. S., Cox, N. J., Goldstein, D. B., Hindorff, L. A., Hunter, D. J., & Visscher, P. M. (2009). Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature, 461, 747–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mehrabian, A. (1994). Evidence bearing on the affiliative tendency (MAFF) and sensitivity to rejection (MSR) scales. Current Psychology, 13, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Menon, S., Lea, R. A., Roy, B., Hanna, M., Wee, S., Haupt, L. M., & Griffiths, L. R. (2012). The human μ-opioid receptor gene polymorphism (A118G) is associated with head pain severity in a clinical cohort of female migraine with aura patients. Journal of Headache and Pain, 13, 513–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Myers, R. L., Airey, D. C., Manier, D. H., Shelton, R. C., & Sanders-Bush, E. (2007). Polymorphisms in the regulatory region of the human serotonin 5-HT 2 A receptor gene (HTR2A) influence gene expression. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Moskowitz, D. S., Pinard, G., Zuroff, D. C., Annable, L., & Young, S. N. (2001). The effect of tryptophan on social interaction in everyday life: A placebo-controlled study. Neuropsychopharmacology, 25, 277–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Neale, B. M., Medland, S. E., Ripke, S., Asherson, P., Franke, B., Lesch, K. P., & Daly, M. (2010). Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 884–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nielsen, D. A., Hamon, S., Yuferov, V., Jackson, C., Ho, A., Ott, J., & Kreek, M. J. (2010). Ethnic diversity of DNA methylation in the OPRM1 promoter region in lymphocytes of heroin addicts. Human Genetics, 127, 639–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., & Wilson, E. O. (2010). The evolution of eusociality. Nature, 466, 1057–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Parsch, J., & Ellegren, H. (2013). The evolutionary causes and consequences of sex-biased gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics, 14, 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334, 1226–1227.

  61. Perilloux, C. (2014). (Mis)reading the signs: Men’s perception of women’s sexual interest. In V. A. Weekes-Shackelford & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 119–133). New York: Springer.

  62. Polderman, T. J. C., Benyamin, B., de Leeuw, C. A., Sullivan, P. F., van Bochoven, A., Visscher, P. M., & Posthuma, D. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47, 702–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Polesskaya, O. O., Aston, C., & Sokolov, B. P. (2006). Allele C-specific methylation of the 5-HT2A receptor gene: evidence for correlation with its expression and expression of DNA methylase DNMT1. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 83, 362–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., & Sham, P. C. (2007). PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 81, 559–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Saccone, S. F., Bierut, L. J., Chesler, E. J., Kalivas, P. W., Lerman, C., Saccone, N. L., & Sherry, S. T. (2009). Supplementing high-density SNP microarrays for additional coverage of disease-related genes: addiction as a paradigm. PloS One, 4, e5225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Santer, B. D., Wigley, T. M. L., & Taylor, K. E. (2011). The reproducibility of observational estimates of surface and atmospheric temperature change. Science, 334, 1232–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Schweiger, D., Stemmler, G., Burgdorf, C., & Wacker, J. (2014). Opioid receptor blockade and warmth-liking: effects on interpersonal trust and frontal asymmetry. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1608–1615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Sia, A. T., Lim, Y., Lim, E. C., Goh, R. W., Law, H. Y., Landau, R., & Tan, E. C. (2009). A118G single nucleotide polymorphism of human μ-opioid receptor gene influences pain perception and patient-controlled intravenous morphine consumption after intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest, 29, 26–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Slavich, G. M., Tartter, M. A., Brennan, P. A., & Hammen, C. (2014). Endogenous opioid system influences depressive reactions to socially painful targeted rejection life events. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 49, 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. The International Consortium for Blood Pressure Genome-Wide Association Studies (2011). Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature, 478, 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Townsend, J. M., & Levy, G. D. (1990). Effects of potential partners’ physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Tracy, J. L., & Beall, A. T. (2011). Happy guys finish last: the impact of emotion expressions on sexual attraction. Emotion, 11, 1379–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Troisi, A., Frazzetto, G., Carola, V., Di Lorenzo, G., Coviello, M., D’Amato, F. R., & Gross, C. (2011). Social hedonic capacity is associated with the A118G polymorphism of the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) in adult healthy volunteers and psychiatric patients. Social Neuroscience, 6, 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Tse, W. S., & Bond, A. J. (2002). Serotonergic intervention affects both social dominance and affiliative behaviour. Psychopharmacology, 161, 324–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Viikki, M., Huuhka, K., Leinonen, E., Illi, A., Setälä-Soikkeli, E., Huuhka, M., & Kampman, O. (2011). Interaction between two HTR2A polymorphisms and gender is associated with treatment response in MDD. Neuroscience Letters, 501, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Wang, E., Ding, Y. C., Flodman, P., Kidd, J. R., Kidd, K. K., Grady, D. L., & Moyzis, R. K. (2004). The genetic architecture of selection at the human dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene locus. American Journal of Human Genetics, 74, 931–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Wang, E. T., Kodama, G., Baldi, P., & Moyzis, R. K. (2006). Global landscape of recent inferred Darwinian selection for Homo sapiens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 135–140.

  83. Way, B. M., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Is there a genetic contribution to cultural differences? Collectivism, individualism and genetic markers of social sensitivity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Way, B. M., Taylor, S. E., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2009). Variation in the μ-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) is associated with dispositional and neural sensitivity to social rejection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15079–15084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Weisstaub, N. V., Zhou, M., Lira, A., Lambe, E., González-Maeso, J., Hornung, J. P., & Ansorge, M. S. (2006). Cortical 5-HT2A receptor signaling modulates anxiety-like behaviors in mice. Science, 313, 536–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhang, Y., Wang, D., Johnson, A. D., Papp, A. C., & Sadée, W. (2005). Allelic expression imbalance of human mu opioid receptor (OPRM1) caused by variant A118G. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 280, 32618–32624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Zuk, O., Hechter, E., Sunyaev, S. R., & Lander, E. S. (2012). The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 1193–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Society of Research on Adolescence and Psi Chi National Honor Society for funding this research and our research assistants for their hard work on this project: Jonathan B. Lim, Stephanie Nguyen, Blaise Lallathin, Paul Phandl, Melody Lim, Ronica Senores, Justin Huft, Gabriel Corpus, Jennifer Lai, and Marissa Tom.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Wu.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 16.8 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, K., Chen, C., Moyzis, R.K. et al. Gender Interacts with Opioid Receptor Polymorphism A118G and Serotonin Receptor Polymorphism −1438 A/G on Speed-Dating Success. Hum Nat 27, 244–260 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-016-9257-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Human mate selection
  • Opioid
  • Serotonin
  • Speed-dating
  • Behavioral genetics